AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE

CORE STATE Navi 48
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2790 MHz
TDP 220 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2500 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
5,424
N/A
geekbench_opencl
109,309
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between these two graphics solutions. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS, which converts to 1.28 TFLOPS. This represents a 26.8x advantage for the AMD part in raw floating-point throughput. The gap is similarly pronounced in texture processing, where the RX 9070 GRE achieves 535.7 GTexel/s against 40.00 GTexel/s for the Intel integrated solution, a 13.4x margin. Pixel throughput shows the AMD card at 267.8 GPixel/s versus 20.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part, a 13.4x difference as well.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test provides a direct measurement for the AMD card, scoring 5424 points. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark score in the database, which limits direct comparison. The AMD card also posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109309. The Intel part carries an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, reflecting the absence of submitted results. The RX 9070 GRE holds an 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the Intel integrated graphics sits at the 50th percentile.

In terms of memory bandwidth, the AMD card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The Intel solution relies on system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, which in practice places it far below dedicated graphics memory in throughput. The AMD card's memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer rate.

The processor configuration further separates these products. The RX 9070 GRE contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, and 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile contains 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 2 ray tracing cores. Each of these counts scales consistently with the performance gap observed in the compute measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE wins in every measurable category within the database. Its 220 W TDP and dual-slot cooler with 2x 8-pin power connectors indicate a discrete add-in board designed for sustained high-load operation. The suggested power supply of 550 W confirms the power delivery expectations for this class of hardware. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile operates at 25 W TDP with no power connectors and an IGP slot width, which places it in the integrated graphics segment.

The RX 9070 GRE targets desktop systems with PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface and display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Intel part uses an IGP bus interface and its display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning the manufacturer of the host device determines connectivity. The production status for both parts reads Active, and both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For use cases involving 3D rendering, video encoding, or any GPU-accelerated compute workload, the database shows the AMD card with decisive advantages. The 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 figure supports heavy compute loads, while the FP16 performance matches FP32 at a 1:1 ratio, also 34.28 TFLOPS. The Intel part delivers 2.560 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, indicating half-rate FP16 execution. The RX 9070 GRE also supports 48 ray tracing cores, which positions it for ray-traced workloads, whereas the Intel part provides only 2 ray tracing cores.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile serves the mobile integrated segment, where the 25 W power envelope and system shared memory are the defining characteristics. Its base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 2500 MHz allow it to scale when thermal headroom permits, but the physical resource limits remain. The database records no benchmark submissions for this Intel part, so its real-world positioning relies on the architectural specifications rather than measured results.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The die contains 53,900 million transistors across 357 mm², yielding a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². This part belongs to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation within the Radeon RX 9000 series, with its predecessor listed as Navi III. The release date in the database is 2025-05-07.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, manufactured on Intel's 3 nm process. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, and no transistor density figure is recorded. This part belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation, with its predecessor listed as HD Graphics-M. The release date in the database is 2026-04-15.

Clock behavior differs substantially between the two. The RX 9070 GRE runs at a 1420 MHz base clock and boosts to 2790 MHz, with a game clock of 2220 MHz. The Intel part runs at a 300 MHz base clock and boosts to 2500 MHz. The lower base clock on the Intel part reflects power management priorities for mobile integration, while the boost clock indicates the ceiling for short-duration workloads.

The memory architecture differences are fundamental. The RX 9070 GRE employs dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, and bandwidth is listed as system dependent. This means the Intel part's memory performance varies with the host platform's memory configuration, whereas the AMD card has fixed, predictable bandwidth.

Both parts support the same API feature set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 9070 GRE uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 connection, providing substantial bandwidth for host communication. The Intel part uses an IGP connection, which integrates it directly into the processor package. The RX 9070 GRE requires a 550 W suggested power supply and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, while the Intel part draws power through the motherboard with no external connectors.

The FP16 implementation differs as well. The RX 9070 GRE achieves FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning full-rate half-precision execution at 34.28 TFLOPS. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile reaches FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, delivering 2.560 TFLOPS, which is half of its FP32 rate. This architectural choice affects workloads that rely on half-precision arithmetic, such as certain machine learning inference tasks. The RX 9070 GRE has no tensor cores listed in the database, and neither does the Intel part.

Process node differences also matter. TSMC's 4 nm process for the AMD chip and Intel's 3 nm process for the Intel chip represent different manufacturing approaches. The AMD chip's transistor density of 151.0M per mm² provides a reference point for the Navi 48 die, while the Intel die remains unspecified in the database. The RX 9070 GRE measures 357 mm², a substantial die for a desktop graphics card, while the Intel part's die size is unknown.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the superior graphics processor across all recorded metrics. The RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 535.7 GTexel/s texture rate, and 267.8 GPixel/s pixel rate, against 1,280.0 GFLOPS, 40.00 GTexel/s, and 20.00 GPixel/s for the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5424 for the AMD card demonstrates concrete DX12 performance, while the Intel part has no recorded 3DMark result.

The nearest rivals in the database for the RX 9070 GRE provide context for its standing. The Intel Arc A580 averages 57756 with a delta of -0.7%, meaning the RX 9070 GRE trails it by 0.7%. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085 with a -1.2% delta. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58239 with a -1.5% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392 with a -1.8% delta. These deltas show the RX 9070 GRE performing within 2% of several established desktop and mobile parts, based on average benchmark scores.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark data. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it at the median of the database, but this ranking derives from the absence of measured results rather than demonstrated performance. The 25 W TDP and IGP form factor position this part for low-power mobile systems where dedicated graphics is not an option.

The RX 9070 GRE carries a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded. The AMD card requires a 550 W suggested PSU and dual-slot cooling, making it suitable for desktop builds with adequate power delivery. The Intel part draws 25 W and requires no additional power connectors, fitting into thin-and-light portable devices.

The release dates place the RX 9070 GRE in the market on 2025-05-07 and the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile on 2026-04-15. Both parts remain in Active production status according to the database. The RX 9070 GRE belongs to the Radeon RX 9000 series with RDNA 4.0 architecture, and the Intel part belongs to the Arc Graphics-M line with Xe3-LPG architecture.

For users seeking maximum graphics throughput, the RX 9070 GRE is the clear selection. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 48 ray tracing cores provide the resources for demanding workloads. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile suits systems where the 25 W power budget and integrated form factor are the primary constraints, accepting the substantial compute and memory bandwidth limitations recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: How do the FP32 compute performances compare between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS. The AMD card provides roughly 26.8 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The RX 9070 GRE uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a 220 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested power supply with 2x 8-pin connectors. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP and uses no external power connectors.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The AMD Navi 48 chip uses TSMC's 4 nm process. The Intel Wildcat Lake chip uses Intel's 3 nm process.

Q: What are the ray tracing core counts?

A: The RX 9070 GRE contains 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile contains 2 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has an average benchmark score of 57367. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, indicating no recorded benchmark submissions.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9070 GRE
Graphics 2 Xe Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,072
256 -91.7%
Shaders
3,072
256 -91.7%
TMUs
192
16 -91.7%
ROPs
96
8 -91.7%
Compute Units
48
—
Execution Units
—
4
Clocks
Base Clock
1420 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
2790 MHz
2500 MHz
Game Clock
2220 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
12 GB
System Shared
VRAM (MB)
12,288
—
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
192 bit
System Shared
Bandwidth
432.0 GB/s
System Dependent
Cache
L1 Cache
—
64 KB (per EU)
L2 Cache
8 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
48 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
267.8 GPixel/s
20.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
535.7 GTexel/s
40.00 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
34.28 TFLOPS
1,280.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,071.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
160.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
34.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.560 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
48
2 -95.8%
XMX Cores
—
32
Matrix Cores
96
—
Power
TDP
220 W
25 W
TDP (W)
220
25 -88.6%
Suggested PSU
550 W
—
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Xe3-LPG
GPU Name
Navi 48
Wildcat Lake
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Transistors
53,900 million
unknown
Die Size
357 mm²
unknown
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Density
151.0M / mm²
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
IGP
Other
Launch Price
549 USD
—
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi III
HD Graphics-M
View Radeon RX 9070 GRE Details View Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Details