AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. The benchmark database lists no shared test entries for these two products, meaning a side-by-side comparison of identical workloads is not possible from available measurements.

What can be established from the database is the relative standing of each product in the broader GPU landscape. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57,367. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile holds the 50th percentile, which represents the median of all recorded GPUs. The gap in average score is substantial: the database shows no aggregate score for the Intel part (0), while the AMD part carries a four-figure average. That difference in recorded average score is not a direct performance measurement, but it reflects how much data exists for each product and how they are positioned in the database hierarchy.

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has two recorded benchmark results. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 5,424. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 109,309. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark results at all, so no workload-specific scores can be cited for it.

The nearest rivals to the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE in the database provide context for its average score. The Intel Arc A580 scores 57,756, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, which is 1.2% higher. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239, which is 1.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, which is 1.8% higher. In each case, the RX 9070 GRE trails by less than two percentage points, placing it in a tight cluster of comparable desktop and mobile parts. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no nearest rivals listed, so no comparable score deltas exist for it.

Architecture Differences

The two products are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture and belongs to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel. The process node difference favors the Intel part in terms of lithography, but the transistor data tells a different story: the AMD chip packs 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. Intel's transistor count, die size, and density are listed as unknown or null in the database.

The compute resources are sharply divergent. The AMD part contains 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 48 RT cores. The Intel part contains 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 RT core. The AMD part uses a 192-bit memory bus with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure, and its memory type and bus width are both listed as system shared. The AMD part's pixel rate is 267.8 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 535.7 GTexel/s. The Intel part's pixel rate is 9.2 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 18.4 GTexel/s.

The FP32 and FP16 figures underline the scale difference. The AMD part delivers 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 and 34.28 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part delivers 588.8 GFLOPS of FP32 and 1,177.6 GFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The AMD part's FP32 output is roughly 58 times higher than the Intel part's, and its FP16 output is roughly 29 times higher. The Intel part supports the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are listed as active production parts.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile delivers 588.8 GFLOPS. The AMD part is substantially higher.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure.

Q: How do their RT core counts compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 48 RT cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 1 RT core.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is built on a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the TDP difference between them?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Does the Intel part have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark results for the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (5,424) and Geekbench OpenCL (109,309).

The Verdict

The data presents two products aimed at completely different segments. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is a desktop add-in board with a dual-slot cooler, two 8-pin power connectors, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. It carries a launch MSRP of 549 USD. Its 220 W TDP and 87th percentile standing among all GPUs place it as a high-performance discrete solution. Its nearest rivals in the database are all within 1.8% of its average score, which indicates that it competes in a tightly packed performance tier.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, an IGP bus interface, and portable-device-dependent display outputs. It sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which is the median, not a low-end placement. With 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 RT core, it is positioned for lightweight graphics workloads inside mobile devices. Its use of system shared memory and system dependent bandwidth confirms that it relies on the host platform for both capacity and throughput.

For users seeking a discrete GPU with high compute throughput, large dedicated memory, and a wide memory bus, the AMD part is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For users who need integrated graphics with low power draw and no external power requirement, the Intel part fits that role. The two do not overlap in TDP, memory architecture, or physical form factor, so the decision rests on platform type and workload scale. The benchmark database records no shared test results, so any direct comparison of frame rates or compute workloads is not supported by the available data.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products in the database:

• Architecture: AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses RDNA 4.0; Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses Xe3-LPG.
• Chip: Navi 48 versus Wildcat Lake.
• Generation: Navi IV (RX 9000) versus Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake).
• Process node: 4 nm at TSMC versus 3 nm at Intel.
• Transistors: 53,900 million versus unknown.
• Die size: 357 mm² versus unknown.
• Transistor density: 151.0M / mm² versus null.
• Base clock: 1420 MHz versus 300 MHz.
• Boost clock: 2790 MHz versus 2300 MHz.
• Game clock: 2220 MHz versus null.
• Memory clock: 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective versus system shared.
• Memory size: 12 GB GDDR6 versus system shared.
• Memory type: GDDR6 versus system shared.
• Bus width: 192 bit versus system shared.
• Bandwidth: 432.0 GB/s versus system dependent.
• Shading units: 3,072 versus 128.
• TMUs: 192 versus 8.
• ROPs: 96 versus 4.
• RT cores: 48 versus 1.
• Pixel rate: 267.8 GPixel/s versus 9.2 GPixel/s.
• Texture rate: 535.7 GTexel/s versus 18.4 GTexel/s.
• FP32: 34.28 TFLOPS versus 588.8 GFLOPS.
• FP16: 34.28 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: 220 W versus 25 W.
• Slot width: Dual-slot versus IGP.
• Power connectors: 2x 8-pin versus none.
• Suggested PSU: 550 W versus null.
• Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus IGP.
• Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a versus portable device dependent.
• Release date: 2025-05-07 versus 2026-04-15.
• Predecessor: Navi III versus HD Graphics-M.
• Launch MSRP: 549 USD versus null.
• Percentile vs all GPUs: 87 versus 50.
• Average benchmark score: 57,367 versus 0.
• Nearest rivals: four listed for AMD, none listed for Intel.
• Benchmarks: two recorded for AMD, none for Intel.