AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs NVIDIA B300 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the NVIDIA B300. The RX 9060 XT LP has recorded benchmark scores, while the B300 has none in the current dataset. This asymmetry makes a conventional performance comparison impossible from measured data alone.

What the data does show is the RX 9060 XT LP's standing in the broader GPU population. It scores 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 63,830. That places it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63,842 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63,775 (0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693 (0.2% delta), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64,212 (-0.6% delta). The RX 9060 XT LP sits essentially level with these cards, within a fraction of a percent in either direction.

The B300, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, with no nearest rivals listed. That does not mean it is a weak product; it means the database lacks measured performance data for it. The B300 is a server accelerator with no display outputs, and its benchmark profile has not been populated. The RX 9060 XT LP, a client graphics card with active production status, has been evaluated under standard compute workloads.

Because the head-to-head array is empty and winsA and winsB are both 0, the only honest reading is that no direct comparison exists in the recorded measurements. The RX 9060 XT LP's scores stand on their own, and the B300's capabilities must be inferred from its architecture and specifications rather than from benchmark results.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the RX 9060 XT LP wins in any scenario where measured compute benchmarks matter. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 and Vulkan score of 39,476 demonstrate functional performance in those APIs. The B300 has no benchmark entries, so it cannot claim a win in any measured workload.

The RX 9060 XT LP also wins on accessibility. It has display outputs: one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a connections. The B300 has no outputs at all, making it unsuitable for any direct display use. The RX 9060 XT LP supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the B300 lists no API support in the database.

The B300 wins on raw architectural scale. It has 18,944 shading units against the RX 9060 XT LP's 2,048. Its 592 texture mapping units dwarf the RX 9060 XT LP's 128. Its 592 tensor cores are a feature the RX 9060 XT LP lacks entirely (the RX 9060 XT LP has null tensor cores). The B300's FP16 throughput of 1,231.8 TFLOPS (16:1 ratio) is far above the RX 9060 XT LP's 24.99 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The B300's FP32 performance of 76.99 TFLOPS also exceeds the RX 9060 XT LP's 24.99 TFLOPS.

The B300 wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. It has 144 GB of HBM3e across a 4096-bit bus, delivering 4.10 TB/s. The RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 322.3 GB/s. The B300 has roughly 12.7 times the memory capacity and 12.7 times the bandwidth, based on the figures in the database.

The RX 9060 XT LP wins on power efficiency in practical terms. Its TDP is 140 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The B300's TDP is 1400 W with a suggested PSU of 1800 W. The RX 9060 XT LP draws one-tenth the power, though it also delivers far less compute throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The RX 9060 XT LP uses AMD's RDNA 4.0 architecture, built on the Navi 44 chip. The B300 uses NVIDIA's Blackwell Ultra architecture, built on the GB110 chip. The RX 9060 XT LP belongs to the Navi IV generation (RX 9000 series), while the B300 belongs to the Server Blackwell generation.

The manufacturing process differs: the RX 9060 XT LP is on a 4 nm node, while the B300 is on a 5 nm node. Both are fabricated by TSMC. Transistor counts diverge sharply. The RX 9060 XT LP has 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2 million per mm². The B300 has 104,000 million transistors, with no die size or density listed in the database.

Clock behavior also differs. The RX 9060 XT LP has a base clock of 1380 MHz, a boost clock of 3050 MHz, and a game clock of 2450 MHz. The B300 has a base clock of 1665 MHz and a boost clock of 2032 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks are presented differently: the RX 9060 XT LP runs at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective, while the B300 runs at 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The RX 9060 XT LP uses 16 GB of GDDR6. The B300 uses 144 GB of HBM3e. Bus widths are 128 bits versus 4096 bits. The B300's 4.10 TB/s bandwidth is an order of magnitude higher than the RX 9060 XT LP's 322.3 GB/s.

The compute resource layout differs in kind, not just quantity. The RX 9060 XT LP has 32 ray tracing cores, while the B300 has no ray tracing cores listed. The B300 has 592 tensor cores, while the RX 9060 XT LP has none. Pixel rates favor the RX 9060 XT LP at 195.2 GPixel/s versus the B300's 48.77 GPixel/s. Texture rates favor the B300 at 1,202.9 GTexel/s versus 390.4 GTexel/s for the RX 9060 XT LP.

The physical formats are entirely different. The RX 9060 XT LP is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector. The B300 is an SXM module with no power connector listed. The RX 9060 XT LP has display outputs; the B300 has none. The B300's predecessor is "Server Hopper" and its successor is "Server Rubin," while the RX 9060 XT LP's predecessor is "Navi III" with no successor listed.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher benchmark scores?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP has recorded scores of 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan. The B300 has no benchmark entries in the database, so no comparison is possible from measured data.

Q: What is the memory size difference?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The B300 has 144 GB of HBM3e memory.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The B300 has 18,944 shading units. The RX 9060 XT LP has 2,048 shading units.

Q: Does the B300 support display output?

A: No. The B300 lists "No outputs" for display connections. The RX 9060 XT LP has one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP has a TDP of 140 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The B300 has a TDP of 1400 W and a suggested PSU of 1800 W.

Q: Which card has tensor cores?

A: Only the B300 has tensor cores, with 592 of them. The RX 9060 XT LP has no tensor cores listed.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards:

• Chip: Navi 44 (AMD) versus GB110 (NVIDIA)
• Architecture: RDNA 4.0 versus Blackwell Ultra
• Generation: Navi IV (RX 9000) versus Server Blackwell (Bxx)
• Process node: 4 nm versus 5 nm
• Transistors: 29,700 million versus 104,000 million
• Die size: 199 mm² versus not listed
• Transistor density: 149.2M / mm² versus not listed
• Base clock: 1380 MHz versus 1665 MHz
• Boost clock: 3050 MHz versus 2032 MHz
• Game clock: 2450 MHz versus not listed
• Memory clock: 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective) versus 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
• Memory size: 16 GB versus 144 GB
• Memory type: GDDR6 versus HBM3e
• Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 4096 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 322.3 GB/s versus 4.10 TB/s
• Shading units: 2048 versus 18944
• TMUs: 128 versus 592
• ROPs: 64 versus 24
• Ray tracing cores: 32 versus not listed
• Tensor cores: not listed versus 592
• Pixel rate: 195.2 GPixel/s versus 48.77 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 390.4 GTexel/s versus 1,202.9 GTexel/s
• FP32 performance: 24.99 TFLOPS versus 76.99 TFLOPS
• FP16 performance: 24.99 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 1,231.8 TFLOPS (16:1)
• TDP: 140 W versus 1400 W
• Slot width: Dual-slot versus SXM Module
• Power connector: 1x 8-pin versus not listed
• Suggested PSU: 300 W versus 1800 W
• Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a versus no outputs
• DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus not listed
• OpenGL support: 4.6 versus not listed
• Vulkan support: 1.4 versus not listed
• Release date: 2025-12-16 versus 2025-09-10
• Predecessor: Navi III versus Server Hopper
• Successor: not listed versus Server Rubin
• Percentile vs all GPUs: 89 versus 50
• Average benchmark score: 63,830 versus 0

The Verdict

The data presents two products with different purposes. The RX 9060 XT LP is a client GPU with display outputs, API support, and measured benchmark scores. The B300 is a server module with no display outputs, no listed APIs, and no benchmark data. A user needing a graphics card for standard compute workloads, display output, and DirectX or Vulkan support would choose the RX 9060 XT LP based on the available measurements. Its 89th percentile standing and recorded OpenCL and Vulkan scores demonstrate functional capability.

A user needing massive memory capacity, tensor core acceleration, and high FP16 throughput would look to the B300. Its 144 GB HBM3e, 592 tensor cores, and 1,231.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance indicate a specialized compute accelerator. The B300's absence of benchmark scores means its real-world performance is unverified in this database, but its specifications point to a different class of hardware entirely.

The power envelope separates them decisively. The RX 9060 XT LP requires 140 W and a 300 W PSU. The B300 requires 1400 W and an 1800 W PSU. The B300's 76.99 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly three times the RX 9060 XT LP's 24.99 TFLOPS, but at ten times the power draw. The RX 9060 XT LP's higher pixel rate (195.2 GPixel/s versus 48.77 GPixel/s) suggests it handles rasterization-oriented tasks more efficiently, while the B300's texture rate (1,202.9 GTexel/s versus 390.4 GTexel/s) indicates raw texture throughput.

The release dates show the B300 launched first, on 2025-09-10, with the RX 9060 XT LP following on 2025-12-16. Both are listed as active in production. The B300 has a defined successor (Server Rubin), while the RX 9060 XT LP does not list one. The RX 9060 XT LP's predecessor is Navi III, and the B300's is Server Hopper, placing each in its respective family line.

The verdict, strictly from the data: the RX 9060 XT LP is the only one of the two with measurable performance in the database, making it the choice for any workload where benchmark validation matters. The B300 is a specification sheet without measured results, suited for environments where raw specifications such as memory bandwidth, tensor core count, and FP16 throughput take priority over tested performance. Neither card serves the other's intended role, and the data does not support a direct performance ranking.