AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 occupy entirely different segments of the GPU market, and the recorded data confirms this split clearly. The AMD part is a retail graphics card with active benchmark results, while the Intel part is a compute-oriented accelerator with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This fundamental difference shapes every comparison between the two.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers measurable performance in the two benchmark tests recorded for it. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 and Vulkan score of 39,476 place it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The average benchmark score of 63,830 indicates a solid mid-to-upper tier position. This card is designed for conventional graphics workloads, as shown by its display outputs, its RDNA 4.0 architecture, and its dual-slot form factor.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking sits at 50, which reflects the absence of data rather than actual performance. The card targets data center compute tasks, evidenced by its OAM Module slot width, its lack of display outputs, and its 96 GB memory capacity. The database contains no wins for either product in head-to-head testing, and both products show zero wins in the recorded comparison.

The use-case split is straightforward from the available data. The AMD card serves client graphics, with active production status, a 2025 release date, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel card serves server and accelerator workloads, with a 2023 release date, a 450 W TDP, and a successor model already listed as the H3C Graphics. The recorded data shows no overlap in their intended deployment scenarios.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs differ at every level of their design. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip built on Generation 12.5 architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The transistor counts reflect their different scales: AMD integrates 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, while Intel integrates 100,000 million transistors on a 1,280 mm² die. The transistor density favors AMD at 149.2 million transistors per square millimeter versus Intel's 78.1 million.

Clock speeds diverge substantially. The AMD card operates at a 1,380 MHz base clock, a 2,450 MHz game clock, and a 3,050 MHz boost clock. The Intel part runs at a 750 MHz base clock and a 1,550 MHz boost clock, with no game clock listed. The AMD card also runs its memory at 2,518 MHz, translating to 20.1 Gbps effective, whereas the Intel card runs memory at 1,200 MHz, or 2.4 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations could hardly be more different. The AMD card carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 322.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card carries 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8,192-bit bus, delivering 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth. The Intel memory subsystem provides roughly seven times the bandwidth of the AMD solution, which aligns with its data center positioning.

Compute resources also differ by a wide margin. The Intel part has 14,336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, and 112 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel GPU reports a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s, consistent with its lack of display outputs, while the AMD card achieves 195.2 GPixel/s. Texture rate favors Intel at 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus AMD's 390.4 GTexel/s. Floating point performance follows the same pattern: Intel delivers 44.44 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16, while AMD delivers 24.99 TFLOPS in both.

The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel card supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan support listed. Power requirements differ accordingly: the AMD card has a 140 W TDP and a suggested 300 W PSU, while the Intel card has a 450 W TDP and a suggested 850 W PSU. The AMD card uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the Intel card lists no power connectors, consistent with its OAM Module form factor. The AMD card provides one HDMI 2.1b port and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs; the Intel card provides no outputs.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one conclusion: these are different tools for different jobs. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a client graphics card with verified benchmark results, a compact dual-slot design, and display outputs. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a compute accelerator with a massive memory pool, high FP32 throughput, and no display capability.

For conventional graphics workloads, the AMD card has the measured data on its side. Its 89th percentile ranking, its DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory make it a functional choice for rendering tasks. The 24.99 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is substantial for a 140 W card.

For compute-heavy data center workloads, the Intel card offers capabilities the AMD card cannot match. The 96 GB HBM2e memory with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth and 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are decisive advantages for large-scale compute tasks. The 450 W TDP and OAM Module form factor indicate a server-oriented design.

The database contains no benchmark results for the Intel card, so direct performance comparison is impossible. The AMD card's nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA CMP 30HX with an average score of 63,842, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63,775, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64,212. The Radeon RX 9060 XT LP sits within 0.6% of all four, indicating tightly clustered performance around the 63,800-64,200 range. The Intel card has no nearest rivals listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 delivers 2.46 TB/s from its 96 GB HBM2e memory on an 8,192-bit bus. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 322.3 GB/s from its 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Which card supports display outputs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has one HDMI 2.1b port and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 lists no outputs.

Q: What is the AMD card's benchmark performance?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 63,830 and a percentile ranking of 89 among all GPUs.

Q: What is the Intel card's benchmark performance?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking is 50.

Q: How do the transistor counts compare?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 integrates 100,000 million transistors on a 1,280 mm² die at 10 nm. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP integrates 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die at 4 nm.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 throughput?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS in FP32. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS in FP32.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no head-to-head benchmark results between these two products. The wins counter shows zero for both the AMD and Intel parts. This absence of direct comparison data is itself informative, as it reflects the fundamental incompatibility of their target environments.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has two recorded benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 88,183 is its stronger showing, while its Geekbench Vulkan result of 39,476 is notably lower. The average benchmark score of 63,830 places it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals cluster tightly around this figure: the NVIDIA CMP 30HX is 0% different with a score of 63,842, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is 0.1% ahead with 63,775, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 0.2% ahead with 63,693, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 0.6% behind with 64,212. These small deltas indicate that the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP performs within a narrow band of its immediate competition.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The only performance indicators available are its theoretical specifications: 44.44 TFLOPS FP32, 44.44 TFLOPS FP16, 1,388.8 GTexel/s texture rate, and 2.46 TB/s memory bandwidth.

In the absence of head-to-head results, the specifications provide the only basis for comparison. The Intel card leads in FP32 throughput by 19.45 TFLOPS, a 78% advantage over the AMD card. The Intel card leads in memory bandwidth by 2.14 TB/s, a multiple of roughly 7.6 times the AMD card's bandwidth. The Intel card also leads in texture rate by 998.4 GTexel/s. The AMD card leads in pixel rate, with 195.2 GPixel/s versus 0 MPixel/s for the Intel card, and in clock speeds, with a 3,050 MHz boost clock versus 1,550 MHz for the Intel card.

The AMD card holds advantages in process technology, with a 4 nm node versus 10 nm, and in transistor density, with 149.2 million transistors per square millimeter versus 78.1 million. The Intel card holds the raw transistor advantage with 100,000 million total transistors versus 29,700 million. These structural differences explain the performance split: the AMD card uses a dense, modern process for efficient client rendering, while the Intel card uses a larger, older process to pack compute resources for data center workloads.

The data confirms that the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a measured, verified performer in the client GPU space, while the Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a specification-driven compute accelerator awaiting benchmark data.