AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the Intel Arc 140T Mobile are not available in the recorded data. The database contains no head-to-head test results for these two products, and the Intel Arc 140T Mobile has no individual benchmark entries on file. This absence of direct measurements means the comparison must rely on the aggregate performance percentile and the available benchmark scores for the AMD part.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has two recorded benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result is 88183, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 39476. These two results produce an average benchmark score of 63830 across all recorded tests. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, reflecting the lack of any recorded test results for that product.

The percentile ranking clarifies the performance gap. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP sits at the 89th percentile when measured against all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile ranks at the 50th percentile. This 39-percentage-point difference in percentile placement indicates that the AMD part outperforms the vast majority of recorded GPUs, while the Intel part sits at the median of the distribution.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP provide additional context for its average score. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX has an average score of 63842, which is 0% different from the AMD part’s 63830. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, a 0.1% advantage for the RX 9060 XT LP. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, which is 0.2% behind the RX 9060 XT LP. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212, which places it 0.6% ahead of the RX 9060 XT LP. These near-identical scores show that the RX 9060 XT LP sits in a tightly packed performance cluster, where a 0.6% swing separates the top and bottom of its immediate competitive group.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is the substantially faster product. Its 89th percentile ranking versus the Intel Arc 140T Mobile’s 50th percentile is the single most decisive metric in the database. The AMD part delivers a 24.99 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate, while the Intel part delivers 4.813 TFLOPS. That is a 5.2x difference in raw shader throughput. The pixel rate difference is similar in scale: 195.2 GPixel/s for AMD versus 75.20 GPixel/s for Intel, a 2.6x gap. The texture rate comparison shows 390.4 GTexel/s versus 150.4 GTexel/s, a 2.6x margin.

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is a 35 W integrated graphics processor (IGP) designed for portable devices, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a 140 W dual-slot discrete card with its own 8-pin power connector. The power envelope difference explains much of the performance gap. The AMD part draws 140 W and requires a 300 W power supply, whereas the Intel part consumes 35 W and has no power connector or PSU requirement listed. The performance-per-watt comparison is not directly calculable from the recorded data, but the absolute performance advantage of the AMD part is unambiguous.

For users who need maximum graphical throughput in a desktop system, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is the only choice between these two. For users constrained to a portable or integrated form factor, the Intel Arc 140T Mobile is the available option, but it delivers far lower compute, pixel, and texture rates.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, architectures, and process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture. It is part of the Radeon RX 9000 series, specifically the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC. The chip contains 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 149.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses the Arrow Lake-H chip built on Xe-LPG+ architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation. The process node is 5 nm at TSMC. The database lists the transistor count and die size as unknown for the Intel part, so no density figure is available.

The compute resources differ substantially. The AMD part has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. In every category, the AMD part has exactly double the units of the Intel part, except for ray tracing cores, where the AMD part has 4x the count.

Clock speeds also differ. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has a base clock of 1380 MHz, a boost clock of 3050 MHz, and a game clock of 2450 MHz. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2350 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD part’s boost clock is 700 MHz higher than the Intel part’s.

Memory architecture is a major differentiator. The AMD part has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 322.3 GB/s and a memory clock of 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The Intel part uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. This means the Intel part relies on the host system’s memory, which introduces variability that the dedicated GDDR6 solution avoids.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD part is a dual-slot card with PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 2x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Intel part is an IGP with no slot width, no bus interface beyond IGP, and display outputs that are portable device dependent.

FP16 compute ratios differ as well. The AMD part lists FP16 at 24.99 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning it does not double-rate FP16. The Intel part lists FP16 at 9.626 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning it processes FP16 at twice the FP32 rate. This makes the Intel part relatively stronger at FP16 workloads compared to its own FP32 performance, but its absolute FP16 throughput is still far below the AMD part’s FP16 output.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has an average benchmark score of 63830. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How do their FP32 compute performances compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS FP32. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile delivers 4.813 TFLOPS FP32. The AMD part provides roughly five times the FP32 throughput.

Q: What are the memory configurations?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses system shared memory, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all system dependent.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has 2048 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has 1024 shading units and 8 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has double the shading units and four times the ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has a 140 W TDP and requires a 300 W power supply. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has a 35 W TDP and lists no power supply requirement.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP wins in every performance category where data exists. Its FP32 compute of 24.99 TFLOPS is 5.2 times the Intel part’s 4.813 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 195.2 GPixel/s is 2.6 times the Intel part’s 75.20 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 390.4 GTexel/s is 2.6 times the Intel part’s 150.4 GTexel/s. Its FP16 compute of 24.99 TFLOPS exceeds the Intel part’s 9.626 TFLOPS even though the Intel part benefits from a 2:1 FP16 ratio. The AMD part also has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the Intel part has no dedicated memory at all.

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 35 W TDP is a quarter of the AMD part’s 140 W TDP. It requires no power connector and no separate power supply, and it is an IGP, meaning it is built into the host processor. The AMD part is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 300 W suggested PSU. For compact or battery-powered portable devices, the Intel part fits where the AMD part cannot physically be installed.

Release timing also differs. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile was released on 2025-01-12. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP was released on 2025-12-16. The Intel part came to market roughly eleven months earlier.

The AMD part also wins on bandwidth and memory capacity. With 322.3 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth and 16 GB of capacity, it avoids the system-dependent variability of the Intel part’s shared memory setup. The Intel part’s memory performance is listed as system dependent, meaning its effective bandwidth and latency will vary based on the host platform.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field in the database.

Architecture and chip: AMD uses Navi 44 with RDNA 4.0 architecture. Intel uses Arrow Lake-H with Xe-LPG+ architecture.

Process node: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC. Intel uses 5 nm at TSMC.

Transistors and die size: AMD lists 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving 149.2M transistors per mm². Intel lists both as unknown.

Clocks: AMD has a base clock of 1380 MHz, boost clock of 3050 MHz, and game clock of 2450 MHz. Intel has a base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 2350 MHz, with no game clock listed.

Memory: AMD has 16 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth and 2518 MHz memory clock (20.1 Gbps effective). Intel has system shared memory with system dependent type, bus width, and bandwidth.

Compute units: AMD has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. Intel has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores.

Rates: AMD delivers 195.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, 390.4 GTexel/s texture rate, 24.99 TFLOPS FP32, and 24.99 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). Intel delivers 75.20 GPixel/s pixel rate, 150.4 GTexel/s texture rate, 4.813 TFLOPS FP32, and 9.626 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Power: AMD has a 140 W TDP, dual-slot width, 1x 8-pin power connector, and 300 W suggested PSU. Intel has a 35 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connector, and no suggested PSU.

Interface and outputs: AMD uses PCIe 5.0 x16 with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. Intel uses an IGP bus interface with portable device dependent display outputs.

API support: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release date: AMD released on 2025-12-16. Intel released on 2025-01-12.

Predecessor: AMD’s predecessor is Navi III. Intel’s predecessor is HD Graphics-M.

Benchmark percentile: AMD sits at the 89th percentile versus all GPUs. Intel sits at the 50th percentile.

Average benchmark score: AMD has 63830. Intel has 0.