AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the average benchmark scores of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no recorded benchmark data.

Q: What is the difference in graphics memory capacity between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, whereas the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Which card has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, which is higher than the 288.0 GB/s provided by the AMD Radeon RX 9060.

Q: How do the processing nodes differ between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on a 4 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process, both manufactured by TSMC.

Q: What are the respective FP32 performance figures?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W, whereas the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

The Verdict

The data positions the AMD Radeon RX 9060 as the only card with measurable performance, holding a 59th percentile rank among all GPUs with an average score of 16014. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, by contrast, has a 50th percentile rank but no recorded benchmark results, making direct performance comparison impossible. For users prioritizing verified performance, the RX 9060 is the clear choice based on available measurements. The LX ULTRA, however, offers substantially more memory (24 GB vs 8 GB) and higher raw compute specifications, which could appeal to workloads that favor capacity over tested speed. Without benchmark data for the LX ULTRA, its actual performance remains unquantified, so any selection based on performance must favor the RX 9060.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, meaning no direct comparative tests exist between the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. However, the RX 9060 has a full set of individual benchmark results. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3322. Geekbench results show 88183 in OpenCL and 39476 in Vulkan. Passmark tests reveal scores of 104 in DirectX 10, 182 in DirectX 11, 44 in DirectX 12, 280 in DirectX 9, 1002 in G2D, 17631 in G3D, and 9919 in GPU Compute. These figures establish a performance baseline. The LX ULTRA has no comparable entries, so its relative standing cannot be assessed. The nearest rivals to the RX 9060 provide context: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 16129 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon R9 370X averages 15862 (1% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 averages 15852 (1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 averages 15679 (2.1% lower). The RX 9060 sits slightly below the RTX 3060 Ti but above the other three rivals in average score.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 and Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA differ across nearly every core specification. The RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture, while the LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture. The RX 9060 is built on a 4 nm process; the LX ULTRA uses 6 nm. Transistor count for the RX 9060 is 29,700 million with a die size of 199 mm² and density of 149.2M per mm². The LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are unknown. Clock speeds: the RX 9060 has a base clock of 1700 MHz, boost of 2990 MHz, and game clock of 2400 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks. Both share a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. Memory capacity differs at 8 GB versus 24 GB, with bus widths of 128 bit versus 192 bit and bandwidths of 288.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Shading units are 1792 for the RX 9060 and 6144 for the LX ULTRA. Texture mapping units are 112 versus 192, and raster operation units are 64 versus 96. The RX 9060 has 28 RT cores; the LX ULTRA has none listed. Pixel rates are nearly identical: 191.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 334.9 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 132 W versus 225 W. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin, with suggested PSUs of 300 W versus 550 W. The RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16; the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX ULTRA has physical dimensions of 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width; the RX 9060 has no recorded dimensions. Both are dual-slot cards.

Architecture Differences

The RX 9060 is based on RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, codenamed Strix Point, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. The LX ULTRA uses TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, part of the 7G100 generation. Process nodes differ: 4 nm for the RX 9060 versus 6 nm for the LX ULTRA, both from TSMC. The RX 9060 packs 29,700 million transistors into a 199 mm² die, achieving a density of 149.2M per mm². The LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are not recorded. Core configurations diverge sharply: the RX 9060 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 RT cores; the LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT core listing. FP16 compute on the LX ULTRA is 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, double its FP32 rate, while the RX 9060 runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32 at 21.43 TFLOPS. API support is similar: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RX 9060 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, whereas the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display output technology differs, with the RX 9060 offering HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1a, while the LX ULTRA offers four DisplayPort 1.4a connections.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 wins in measured performance, as it is the only card with benchmark results. Its average score of 16014 places it at the 59th percentile, and it outperforms the AMD Radeon R9 370X by 1%, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 by 1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 by 2.1% in average score. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by 0.7%. The RX 9060 also wins on process efficiency, using a 4 nm node versus 6 nm, and has a lower TDP of 132 W with a 300 W suggested PSU. It supports newer PCIe 5.0 x16 and Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on raw specification counts. It offers 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192 bit bus versus 128 bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. It has more shading units (6144 vs 1792), more TMUs (192 vs 112), more ROPs (96 vs 64), higher pixel rate (192.0 vs 191.4 GPixel/s), higher texture rate (384.0 vs 334.9 GTexel/s), higher FP32 (24.58 vs 21.43 TFLOPS), and higher FP16 (49.15 vs 21.43 TFLOPS). The LX ULTRA also has a larger physical footprint at 268 mm length. For workloads where memory capacity and raw compute throughput are critical, the LX ULTRA has the specification advantage, but without benchmark validation, that advantage remains theoretical. For any application requiring verified performance data, the RX 9060 is the only card with demonstrated results.