AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits sharply between the two cards, but only one of them has recorded performance measurements. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has ten benchmark scores across DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means its performance position cannot be quantified from direct measurements. The RX 9060 holds every measurable win by default, but that does not tell the full story. The LX 7G100 posts a percentileVsAllGpus of 50, placing it at the median of all GPUs in the database, while the RX 9060 sits at percentile 59. These percentile figures are recorded independently of the missing benchmark suite, and they suggest the Lisuan card is expected to land near the middle of the field rather than at the top.

The RX 9060 shows its strongest measured results in DirectX 9 and 2D workloads. Its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 280 and its Passmark G2D score of 1002 are the highest raw numbers in its benchmark set. The DirectX 11 score of 182 and DirectX 10 score of 104 are more modest, and the DirectX 12 score of 44 is notably low. That pattern indicates the card performs best in older API workloads and lighter 2D tasks, while its modern API performance is comparatively weaker. The OpenCL score of 88183 is the standout compute result, far exceeding the Vulkan score of 39476, which suggests the card favors OpenCL compute paths over Vulkan graphics in the recorded tests.

The LX 7G100 has no wins to claim because no benchmark scores exist in the database. Its specification sheet, however, points to a different design philosophy. The card carries 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 raster operations units, and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus. Those figures exceed the RX 9060 in every count. The card also posts a higher FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS versus 21.43 TFLOPS for the RX 9060, and a higher texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 334.9 GTexel/s. The pixel rates are nearly identical at 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX 7G100 and 191.4 GPixel/s for the RX 9060. These specification advantages do not translate into measured wins, but they define where the Lisuan card would likely compete if benchmark data existed.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from entirely different design lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, with a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip based on what the database records as TrueGPU architecture, built on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, so no density figure can be derived.

The memory subsystems diverge significantly. The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Both cards run their memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, so the bandwidth gap comes entirely from the wider bus on the Lisuan card. The memory clock parity is one of the few architectural similarities between the two.

The compute pipelines differ in scale. The RX 9060 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count recorded. The FP16 throughput also differs: the RX 9060 delivers 21.43 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, while the LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 rate is double its FP32 rate. The RX 9060 has no tensor core count recorded, and neither does the LX 7G100.

The cards also differ in their interface and display capabilities. The RX 9060 uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, with no HDMI port listed. The RX 9060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two cards, so direct comparison must rely on the RX 9060's absolute scores and the LX 7G100's specification sheet. The RX 9060's average benchmark score is 16014, placing it at percentile 59 among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with an average score of 16129, which is 0.7 percent ahead of the RX 9060. The AMD Radeon R9 370X averages 15862, which is 1 percent behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 also averages 15852, 1 percent behind. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 averages 15679, 2.1 percent behind. These deltas are small, meaning the RX 9060 sits in a tightly packed performance cluster near the RTX 3060 Ti.

Within its own benchmark set, the RX 9060's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 is the only modern graphics test recorded. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 is the highest single number, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 39476 is less than half of that. The Passmark G3D score of 17631 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 9919 round out the set. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 is disproportionately low compared to the DirectX 11 score of 182 and DirectX 9 score of 280, suggesting the card's raw throughput does not translate evenly across API generations.

The LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no tests were recorded. Its percentileVsAllGpus of 50 is the only comparative data point. That percentile places it exactly at the median of the database, which is a different position than the RX 9060's percentile of 59. The specification sheet suggests the LX 7G100 should outperform the RX 9060 in raw compute: its FP32 rate is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 21.43 TFLOPS, its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 334.9 GTexel/s, and its memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s. None of these figures are validated by recorded benchmark scores, so they remain projections rather than measured results.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmark scores are recorded in the database.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both run at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each card?

A: The RX 9060 sits at percentile 59 among all GPUs in the database. The LX 7G100 sits at percentile 50, which is the median.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units. The RX 9060 has 1792 shading units.

Q: What API versions does each card support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RX 9060?

A: The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with an average score of 16129, which is 0.7 percent ahead. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 are both 1 percent behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1 percent behind.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly favors the AMD Radeon RX 9060 in measured performance. It has a complete benchmark suite, an average score of 16014, and sits at percentile 59. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, is only 0.7 percent ahead, which places the RX 9060 in a competitive tier near a well-known earlier generation card. The RX 9060 also has architectural advantages in modern connectivity, including PCIe 5.0 x16, HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1a, and Vulkan 1.4 support. Its 4 nm process and 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die indicate a dense, modern design.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 cannot be verified through benchmark results. Its percentile of 50 and complete absence of scores mean any performance claim would be speculative. The specification sheet does show a card with substantially higher raw resources: more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, more memory, wider bus, higher FP32 throughput, and higher texture rate. It also draws more power, with a 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU, compared to the RX 9060's 132 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU. The LX 7G100 is also physically larger, measuring 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm, while the RX 9060 has no dimensions recorded.

For a buyer who relies on measured database results, the RX 9060 is the only card with evidence of performance. For a buyer who prioritizes raw specification counts, the LX 7G100 offers more of nearly everything on paper. The data does not support a performance verdict for the LX 7G100, so the choice rests on whether measured results or unverified specifications matter more. The RX 9060 has the recorded scores, the higher percentile, and the modern feature set. The LX 7G100 has the larger memory pool, the wider bus, and the higher theoretical compute rates, none of which are confirmed by any benchmark entry.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9060 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 29,700 million | unknown |

| Die size | 199 mm² | unknown |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1792 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 112 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 28 | null |

| FP32 throughput | 21.43 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 throughput | 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 132 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | not recorded | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Percentile | 59 | 50 |

| Average benchmark score | 16014 | 0 |

The two cards share the same memory type (GDDR6), the same memory clock (2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective), the same slot width (dual-slot), the same power connector configuration (1x 8-pin), the same foundry (TSMC), and the same DirectX and OpenGL support (12 Ultimate 12_2 and 4.6). Everything else in the specification sheet differs between them.