AMD Radeon RX 9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9050

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2600 MHz
TDP 92 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090 D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 575 W
BUS WIDTH 512 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
14,326
geekbench_opencl
N/A
310,674
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
376,915
passmark_directx_10
N/A
231
passmark_directx_11
N/A
371
passmark_directx_12
N/A
219
passmark_directx_9
N/A
434
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,487
passmark_g3d
N/A
44,065
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
28,396

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

The Verdict

The data in this comparison is unambiguous. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a flagship-class GPU operating at a completely different performance tier, while the AMD Radeon RX 9050 is a mainstream, low-power part. The RTX 5090 D sits in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 77,712 points. The RX 9050 has no recorded benchmark scores or rivals in the database, placing it at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, meaning there is no measured data to suggest it competes with the RTX 5090 D in any workload.

The RTX 5090 D delivers 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth, and a 32 GB GDDR7 frame buffer. The RX 9050 provides 10.65 TFLOPS, 288.0 GB/s, and 8 GB GDDR6. The performance gap is roughly an order of magnitude across raw throughput metrics. The RTX 5090 D is the clear choice for any user requiring maximum compute, high-resolution rendering, or large memory allocations. The RX 9050, with a 92 W TDP and a 250 W suggested PSU, is the selection for low-power, compact builds where efficiency and thermal output are the primary constraints. There is no scenario in the recorded data where the RX 9050 outperforms the RTX 5090 D.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The RX 9050 uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5090 D uses the GB202 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 5 nm process. The transistor counts reflect the scale difference: the Navi 44 die contains 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a density of 149.2 million transistors per mm². The GB202 die contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with a lower density of 122.9 million per mm².

The RTX 5090 D includes 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. The RX 9050 has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores, with no tensor core count listed. The RTX 5090 D also supports a 512-bit memory bus with GDDR7, while the RX 9050 uses a 128-bit bus with GDDR6. Both cards support PCIe 5.0 x16, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the RX 9050 has one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a connectors, while the RTX 5090 D has one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9050 has a boost clock of 2600 MHz, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D boosts to 2407 MHz. Despite the lower boost clock, the RTX 5090 D delivers far higher throughput due to its much larger execution resource count.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each card provide?

A: The RX 9050 provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The RTX 5090 D provides 1.79 TB/s from 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus. The RTX 5090 D has over six times the bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 9050 has a TDP of 92 W and requires a 250 W power supply, using a single 8-pin connector. The RTX 5090 D has a TDP of 575 W and requires a 950 W power supply, using a single 16-pin connector.

Q: What is the release date for each GPU?

A: The RX 9050 was released on 2026-07-27, while the RTX 5090 D was released earlier on 2025-01-29.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the RX 9050?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the RX 9050. Its average benchmark score is zero, and there are no nearest rivals listed. The RTX 5090 D has ten recorded benchmark scores, with an average of 77,712 and a percentile rank of 92.

Q: What is the pixel fill rate difference?

A: The RTX 5090 D achieves 423.6 GPixel/s, while the RX 9050 achieves 166.4 GPixel/s. The RTX 5090 D has a 2.5 times higher pixel throughput.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every measurable specification. The process node differs: 4 nm for the RX 9050 versus 5 nm for the RTX 5090 D. Transistor count is 29,700 million versus 92,200 million. Die size is 199 mm² versus 750 mm². Transistor density is 149.2M per mm² versus 122.9M per mm².

Clock speeds differ in base, boost, and memory frequency. The RX 9050 has a base clock of 1330 MHz and a game clock of 1920 MHz, while the RTX 5090 D has a base clock of 2017 MHz and no listed game clock. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RX 9050 and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5090 D.

Memory configuration differs: 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus versus 32 GB GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus. Bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 1.79 TB/s. The RX 9050 has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores. The RTX 5090 D has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 RT cores, and 680 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s versus 423.6 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s versus 1,636.8 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute are both 10.65 TFLOPS for the RX 9050 and 104.8 TFLOPS for the RTX 5090 D.

TDP is 92 W versus 575 W. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU is 250 W versus 950 W. Display outputs differ in the number and version of DisplayPort connectors. Dimensions are only listed for the RTX 5090 D: 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The release dates differ by over a year, with the RTX 5090 D launching first. The RTX 5090 D has a listed successor, GeForce 60, while the RX 9050 has none. The RTX 5090 D also has a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the RX 9050 and the RTX 5090 D, and the RX 9050 has no recorded scores. The RTX 5090 D, however, has a full set of benchmark results that establish its performance envelope. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the RTX 5090 D scores 14,326 points. In Geekbench OpenCL it scores 310,674, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 376,915. Passmark results include 44,065 in G3D, 28,396 in GPU Compute, 1,487 in G2D, 434 in DX9, 371 in DX11, 231 in DX10, and 219 in DX12.

With no RX 9050 data, the comparison relies on architectural and specification deltas. The RTX 5090 D delivers 10.5 times the FP32 throughput (104.8 versus 10.65 TFLOPS), 6.2 times the memory bandwidth (1.79 TB/s versus 288.0 GB/s), and 21.3 times the shading units (21,760 versus 1,024). The RTX 5090 D also has 10.6 times the RT cores (170 versus 16) and 10.6 times the TMUs (680 versus 64).

The nearest rivals to the RTX 5090 D in the database are all mobile or data center GPUs, not the RX 9050. The AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT scores 76,904, just 1.1% below the RTX 5090 D. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, which is 1.6% above the RTX 5090 D. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79,396, 2.1% higher, and the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79,605, 2.4% higher. These results show the RTX 5090 D sits in a tight cluster with high-end mobile and previous-generation data center parts, while the RX 9050 has no comparable data.

The pixel rate difference of 166.4 versus 423.6 GPixel/s indicates the RTX 5090 D can drive significantly higher resolution output. The texture rate difference of 166.4 versus 1,636.8 GTexel/s is a 9.8 times gap. The memory size difference of 8 GB versus 32 GB means the RTX 5090 D can hold four times as much data locally, which is critical for large datasets or high-resolution textures.

The RTX 5090 D is also the only card in this comparison with tensor cores, listed at 680, which enables AI-accelerated workloads that the RX 9050 cannot address through dedicated hardware. The RTX 5090 D has a higher transistor count and larger die, but lower transistor density, reflecting the different design priorities and node characteristics. The RX 9050 uses a denser 4 nm process but packs far fewer resources overall.

Both cards share the same API support, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so software compatibility is equivalent at the API level. The physical slot width is dual-slot for both. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for both, so platform integration is identical in that regard.

The RTX 5090 D has a production status of Active and a listed successor in GeForce 60. The RX 9050 also has an Active production status and a predecessor of Navi III. The RTX 5090 D has a predecessor of GeForce 40. The power connector and PSU requirements differ substantially, with the RTX 5090 D demanding 950 W versus 250 W for the RX 9050, which reflects the 6.3 times higher TDP of the NVIDIA card.

Given the absence of RX 9050 benchmark data, the only defensible conclusion from the recorded measurements is that the RTX 5090 D operates at a performance level that the RX 9050 cannot approach based on the architectural specifications. The RTX 5090 D is positioned among GPUs scoring in the 92nd percentile, while the RX 9050 has no measured standing. For any workload that stresses compute, memory bandwidth, or rendering throughput, the RTX 5090 D is the only card in this pair with evidence of capability.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9050
RTX 5090 D
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
21,760 +2025.0%
Shaders
1,024
21,760 +2025.0%
TMUs
64
680 +962.5%
ROPs
64
176 +175.0%
Compute Units
16
—
SM Count
—
170
Clocks
Base Clock
1330 MHz
2017 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
2407 MHz
Game Clock
1920 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
32,768 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
128 bit
512 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
1.79 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
—
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
96 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
423.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
1,636.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
10.65 TFLOPS (1:1)
104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
170 +962.5%
Tensor Cores
—
680
Matrix Cores
32
—
Power
TDP
92 W
575 W
TDP (W)
92
575 +525.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
950 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 44
GB202
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
GeForce 50
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
92,200 million
Die Size
199 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
149.2M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
2,299 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi III
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View Radeon RX 9050 Details View GeForce RTX 5090 D Details