AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database shows a stark contrast between these two GPUs: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has a fully populated benchmark profile, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This makes direct score comparisons impossible, but the data that does exist reveals where each card stands.

The RX 7700 XT delivers an average benchmark score of 22,549 across its recorded tests. Its best showing comes in the Passmark G3D test at 22,547 points, with the Geekbench OpenCL score reaching 138,383 and the Vulkan score hitting 46,443. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records 3,316 points. In Passmark's legacy DX9 test, the card scores 294, while DX11 reaches 232 and DX10 scores 119. DirectX 12 Passmark performance drops to 79 points, and GPU compute registers 12,912 points. The 2D graphics score is 1,161.

Against its nearest rivals, the RX 7700 XT sits in a tight competitive band. It edges the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile by 0.5 percent (22,549 vs. 22,435 average), while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 trails by 1.7 percent (22,170 average). On the other side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile leads by 0.8 percent (22,729 average), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 1.5 percent ahead (22,895 average). The RX 7700 XT ranks in the 67th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database.

The LX ULTRA, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile. With no recorded scores, the database cannot establish any head-to-head wins for either card: the wins counter shows 0 for both. The lack of benchmark data for the LX ULTRA means the RX 7700 XT is the only card in this comparison with measurable performance evidence.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the internal codename Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 28,100 million transistors onto a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip based on a "TrueGPU" architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but the database lists its transistor count and die size as unknown, with no transistor density figure available. The RX 7700 XT's predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded predecessor or successor.

Shader processing shows a notable split. The LX ULTRA carries 6,144 shading units, substantially more than the RX 7700 XT's 3,456. However, the RX 7700 XT has 216 texture mapping units versus 192 on the LX ULTRA, and both cards have 96 raster output units. The RX 7700 XT includes 54 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA has no ray tracing core count recorded. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Clock speeds differ in availability. The RX 7700 XT has a base clock of 1,435 MHz, a boost clock of 2,544 MHz, and a game clock of 2,171 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock values recorded. Both cards run memory at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory configurations are identical in bus width and bandwidth: both use 192-bit GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The key difference is capacity: the LX ULTRA has 24 GB, double the RX 7700 XT's 12 GB.

Compute rates diverge sharply. The RX 7700 XT achieves 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 35.17 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 but 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, indicating a different floating-point design. Pixel and texture rates also favor the RX 7700 XT: 244.2 GPixel/s and 549.5 GTexel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s on the LX ULTRA.

API support is nearly identical for DirectX (12 Ultimate, 12_2) and OpenGL (4.6), but Vulkan differs: the RX 7700 XT supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, exactly double the 12 GB found on the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. Both use a 192-bit bus and deliver 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the compute capabilities compare?

A: The RX 7700 XT leads in FP32 with 35.17 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS on the LX ULTRA. The LX ULTRA leads in FP16 with 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 7700 XT matches its FP32 figure at 35.17 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 7700 XT has a TDP of 245 W and uses two 8-pin power connectors. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. Both list a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which card has better texture and pixel throughput?

A: The RX 7700 XT achieves 549.5 GTexel/s and 244.2 GPixel/s. The LX ULTRA records 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s. The RX 7700 XT is ahead in both metrics.

Q: Do the two cards support the same display outputs?

A: No. The RX 7700 XT provides 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a with no HDMI or USB Type-C outputs.

Q: How do their physical dimensions compare?

A: The RX 7700 XT measures 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Both are dual-slot cards.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 32 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) | 7G100 |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 346 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 81.2M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Base clock | 1,435 MHz | Not recorded |

| Boost clock | 2,544 MHz | Not recorded |

| Game clock | 2,171 MHz | Not recorded |

| Memory size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Shading units | 3,456 | 6,144 |

| Texture mapping units | 216 | 192 |

| Ray tracing cores | 54 | Not recorded |

| Pixel rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 performance | 35.17 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 245 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions (L × H × W) | 267 × 135 × 50 mm | 268 × 112 × 40 mm |

| Release date | 2023-09-05 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 449 USD | Not recorded |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| ROPs | 96 | 96 |

| Slot width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 550 W |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

The Verdict

The data points to a clear division of roles. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the only card with recorded performance evidence: an average benchmark score of 22,549, a 67th percentile ranking, and competitive margins against NVIDIA mobile and desktop GPUs. Its FP32 throughput of 35.17 TFLOPS, pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate of 549.5 GTexel/s make it the stronger choice for raw rasterization and general compute workloads.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers advantages in specific areas. Its 24 GB memory capacity is double that of the RX 7700 XT, which matters for large datasets. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7700 XT's 35.17 TFLOPS, and its 6,144 shading units outnumber the RX 7700 XT's 3,456. It also draws 20 W less power (225 W vs. 245 W) and uses a single 16-pin connector instead of two 8-pin connectors.

However, the LX ULTRA's lack of benchmark scores leaves its real-world performance unverified. The database records no wins for either card, and the LX ULTRA's average score of 0 reflects the absence of test data. Its 50th percentile ranking is a default placement, not a measured result.

Users needing verified performance, ray tracing support, and broader API compatibility (Vulkan 1.4 vs. 1.3) should look to the RX 7700 XT, which also has a larger pixel and texture throughput. Users prioritizing memory capacity, FP16 compute, and lower power draw may consider the LX ULTRA, but the absence of benchmark evidence limits confidence in its capabilities. The RX 7700 XT remains the only card in this comparison with measurable performance data to support a selection decision.