AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents an unusual comparison situation. The database contains a full benchmark suite for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an empty benchmark array. This means no direct head-to-head scores are available for the two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT holds an average benchmark score of 22549 from its ten recorded tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 shows an average benchmark score of 0 due to the absence of recorded measurements.

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT's benchmark results span multiple API tests. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 138383, while its Geekbench Vulkan score is 46443. Passmark tests show a G3D score of 22547, a GPU compute score of 12912, a G2D score of 1161, a DirectX 11 score of 232, a DirectX 9 score of 294, a DirectX 10 score of 119, and a DirectX 12 score of 79. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records a score of 3316. These figures position the AMD card at the 67th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

For comparative context, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT sits near several NVIDIA rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has an average score of 22435, placing the AMD card 0.5% ahead of it. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile averages 22729, putting the AMD card 0.8% behind that model. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 averages 22895, meaning the AMD card trails by 1.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 averages 22170, and the RX 7700 XT leads it by 1.7%. These delta values quantify the AMD card's position in a tight cluster of competing GPUs.

Since the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark scores in the database, there are no recorded wins for either side. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both the winsA and winsB fields show zero. The analysis must therefore rely on architectural specifications and the AMD card's established benchmark performance relative to its nearest rivals.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, the recorded benchmarks demonstrate its strongest areas. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 indicates robust general-purpose compute performance. The Passmark G3D score of 22547 aligns closely with its average benchmark score of 22549, confirming consistent DirectX rendering performance. The Passmark GPU compute score of 12912 shows solid compute throughput beyond graphics workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 provides a modern DirectX 12 gaming metric.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark wins because no benchmark data exists for it. However, its specification sheet suggests areas where it could theoretically compete. The card features 6144 shading units, which is 2688 more than the AMD card's 3456. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) exceeds the AMD card's 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating a potential advantage in mixed-precision workloads. The Lisuan card's texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s are lower than the AMD card's 549.5 GTexel/s and 244.2 GPixel/s, suggesting the AMD card holds advantages in texture-heavy and pixel-bound rendering.

The absence of benchmark data for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 means the database cannot confirm any actual performance wins. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT's position at the 67th percentile, combined with its narrow margins against nearby NVIDIA rivals (0.5% ahead of RTX 5060 Mobile, 0.8% behind RTX 4060 Mobile, 1.5% behind RTX 2080), establishes it as a mid-to-upper-tier performer. The Lisuan card's percentile of 50 reflects its unmeasured status rather than demonstrated capability.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge fundamentally in architecture. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². Its predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip on what is called TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all recorded as unknown. The card has no listed codename, predecessor, or successor.

Memory configurations are identical: both cards use 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2250 MHz memory clock at 18 Gbps effective. This shared memory subsystem means bandwidth and capacity are not differentiators.

Compute resources differ substantially. The AMD card has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no listed ray tracing cores. The AMD card's pixel rate is 244.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the Lisuan card. The AMD card's texture rate is 549.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput favors the AMD card at 35.17 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, while FP16 throughput favors the Lisuan card at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1).

Clock speeds present another contrast. The AMD card has a recorded base clock of 1435 MHz, boost clock of 2544 MHz, and game clock of 2171 MHz. The Lisuan card has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks, leaving its operating frequencies unspecified.

API support shows minor differences. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ: the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, while the Lisuan card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Power and physical specifications vary. The AMD card has a TDP of 245 W, uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W, uses 1x 8-pin power connector, and also has a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both are dual-slot cards. Dimensions differ: the AMD card measures 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. The Lisuan card measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear asymmetry in evidence. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has extensive recorded benchmarks, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its average score of 22549, with narrow margins against nearby rivals (0.5% ahead of RTX 5060 Mobile, 0.8% behind RTX 4060 Mobile, 1.5% behind RTX 2080, 1.7% ahead of RX 5700), indicates a well-characterized mid-to-upper-tier card. The AMD card's release date of 2023-09-05 and launch MSRP of 449 USD provide context for its market positioning.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has zero recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0. Its percentile of 50 is a placeholder derived from missing data, not measured performance. The card's release date of 2026-06-17 places it later in time, but no performance evidence exists to evaluate its capabilities.

For users selecting between these two cards based strictly on database evidence, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the only option with verified performance data. Its 12 GB GDDR6 memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are confirmed specifications. The Lisuan card's higher shading unit count (6144 versus 3456) and FP16 throughput (49.15 TFLOPS versus 35.17 TFLOPS) suggest theoretical compute advantages, but without benchmarks, these cannot be validated. The AMD card's higher pixel rate (244.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (549.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s) indicate likely advantages in conventional rasterization workloads.

The AMD card's established benchmark suite, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 and a Passmark G3D score of 22547, provides concrete reference points. The Lisuan card's lack of any recorded scores means the database cannot substantiate claims of superiority in any workload. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the measured performer, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 remains an unverified specification sheet.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22549, based on ten recorded tests including 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark benchmarks.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD card is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435), 0.8% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile (22729), 1.5% behind the RTX 2080 (22895), and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (22170).

Q: What memory specifications do both cards share?

A: Both cards use 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz at 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the shading unit count for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 3456 shading units, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which is higher than the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Chip | Navi 32 | 7G106 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | unknown |

| Shading Units | 3456 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 216 | 192 |

| ROPs | 96 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 54 | null |

| Base Clock | 1435 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2544 MHz | null |

| Game Clock | 2171 MHz | null |

| Pixel Rate | 244.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 549.5 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 35.17 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 245 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 267 mm | 294 mm |

| Height | 135 mm | 120 mm |

| Width | 50 mm | 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-09-05 | 2026-06-17 |

| Launch MSRP | 449 USD | null |

| Average Benchmark Score | 22549 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 67 | 50 |