AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA H20 NVL16 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the NVIDIA H20 NVL16. The head-to-head table is empty, and neither part has a recorded win in a shared test. This does not mean the two are equivalent; it means the database has no overlapping workload results for these specific SKUs.

What the data does provide is a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE: 2336 points. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has no benchmark entries at all, so its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs sits at 50. The AMD part, by contrast, lands at the 83rd percentile with an average benchmark score of 42723.

Looking at the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE's nearest rivals, the average score of 42723 places it within 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, delta -1.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, delta -1.3%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301, delta -1.3%). The AMD card trails each of these by a narrow margin, which indicates the RX 7650 GRE sits just below a cluster of established mid-range and professional GPUs in aggregate database scoring.

For the NVIDIA H20 NVL16, the absence of benchmark results means the percentile rank of 50 is a default baseline, not a measured outcome. The FP32 compute figure of 39.54 TFLOPS and FP16 of 79.07 TFLOPS (2:1) suggest substantial raw throughput, but without recorded workload scores, the database cannot confirm real-world performance against the RX 7650 GRE.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE records an 83rd percentile versus all GPUs, while the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD part also has a measured average benchmark score of 42723, whereas the NVIDIA part has no entries and an average of 0.

Q: Do the two GPUs share any benchmark results?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has no benchmark scores recorded at all. Only the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has entries: 2336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 83109 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RX 7650 GRE's average score of 42723 is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262), and 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301).

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 uses 96 GB of HBM3 on a 6144-bit bus with 4.03 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 records 39.54 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE records 22.08 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA part is approximately 79% higher in raw FP32 figures.

Q: What are the power requirements listed for each?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and one 8-pin connector. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has a TDP of 400 W with a suggested PSU of 800 W and no power connector listed (it uses an SXM module form factor).

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It uses a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 is built on the Hopper architecture with the GH100 chip, part of the Server Hopper (Hxx) generation. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 80,000 million transistors on an 814 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 98.3M per mm². The NVIDIA chip has roughly 6 times the transistor count and 4 times the die area.

The AMD part has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part has 9984 shading units, 312 TMUs, 24 ROPs, no ray tracing cores listed, and 312 tensor cores. The shading unit count on the NVIDIA part is nearly 5 times higher, while the ROP count is lower (24 versus 64).

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 lists no API support (N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan), which aligns with its server-oriented role and absence of display outputs.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Process node: AMD uses 6 nm, NVIDIA uses 5 nm. Transistor count: AMD has 13,300 million, NVIDIA has 80,000 million. Die size: AMD is 204 mm², NVIDIA is 814 mm². Transistor density: AMD is 65.2M per mm², NVIDIA is 98.3M per mm².

Clocks: AMD base is 1720 MHz with a boost of 2695 MHz and a game clock of 2350 MHz. NVIDIA base is 1830 MHz with a boost of 1980 MHz and no game clock. Memory clock: AMD is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), NVIDIA is 1313 MHz (5.3 Gbps effective).

Memory: AMD has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. NVIDIA has 96 GB HBM3 on a 6144-bit bus with 4.03 TB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: AMD has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 32 ray tracing cores, and no tensor cores. NVIDIA has 9984 shading units, 312 TMUs, 24 ROPs, no ray tracing cores listed, and 312 tensor cores. Pixel rate: AMD is 172.5 GPixel/s, NVIDIA is 47.52 GPixel/s. Texture rate: AMD is 345.0 GTexel/s, NVIDIA is 617.8 GTexel/s. FP32: AMD is 22.08 TFLOPS, NVIDIA is 39.54 TFLOPS. FP16: AMD is 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1), NVIDIA is 79.07 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and form: AMD has a 170 W TDP, dual-slot design, one 8-pin connector, and a 450 W suggested PSU. NVIDIA has a 400 W TDP, SXM module form factor, no power connector listed, and an 800 W suggested PSU.

Bus interface: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8, NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: AMD has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1; NVIDIA has no outputs.

Release dates differ: AMD released on 2025-02-06, NVIDIA on 2025-09-01. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of 279 USD; the NVIDIA part has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The data separates these two GPUs into entirely different product categories. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a client-side graphics card with display outputs, a 170 W TDP, and a recorded 83rd percentile ranking. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 is a server accelerator with an SXM module form factor, no display outputs, a 400 W TDP, and a default 50th percentile due to missing benchmark data.

For gaming and general desktop use, the AMD part has the relevant feature set: DirectX 12 Ultimate support, Vulkan 1.4, HDMI and DisplayPort outputs, and a dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector. The NVIDIA part lacks any display output and lists no graphics API support, making it unsuitable for direct client rendering workloads.

For compute-heavy server tasks, the NVIDIA part shows clear advantages in raw specifications: 39.54 TFLOPS FP32 versus 22.08 TFLOPS, 79.07 TFLOPS FP16 versus 22.08 TFLOPS, 96 GB HBM3 memory with 4.03 TB/s bandwidth versus 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s, and 312 tensor cores versus none. The 6144-bit memory bus and 400 W TDP reflect a design aimed at high-throughput acceleration rather than interactive graphics.

The AMD card's benchmark data shows it performs within 1.3% of several NVIDIA GeForce and Quadro parts in aggregate scoring, which positions it as a capable mid-range option. The NVIDIA card's benchmark table is empty, so the database cannot confirm its real-world performance relative to the AMD part or any other GPU.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in client-facing scenarios. It has display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1), a compact 204 mm length, a dual-slot design, and a 170 W TDP that pairs with a 450 W suggested PSU. Its 64 ROPs and 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate support higher fill rates than the NVIDIA part's 24 ROPs and 47.52 GPixel/s. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 provides a concrete gaming-oriented data point, and its 83rd percentile ranking indicates strong aggregate performance relative to all GPUs in the database.

The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 wins in memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 96 GB of HBM3 on a 6144-bit bus delivers 4.03 TB/s, which is over 13 times the bandwidth of the AMD part's 288.0 GB/s. Its FP32 throughput of 39.54 TFLOPS is 79% higher than the AMD's 22.08 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput of 79.07 TFLOPS is over 3.5 times higher. The 312 tensor cores and 9984 shading units indicate a design optimized for parallel compute workloads, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides a faster host connection than the AMD's PCIe 4.0 x8.

The AMD part wins on clock speeds: 2695 MHz boost versus 1980 MHz, and its pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s dominates the NVIDIA part's 47.52 GPixel/s. The NVIDIA part wins on texture rate: 617.8 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s. The AMD part wins on power efficiency in absolute terms with a 170 W TDP versus 400 W, though the NVIDIA part delivers more compute per watt in FP32 terms (0.099 TFLOPS/W versus 0.130 TFLOPS/W). The AMD part also wins on software API compatibility with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the NVIDIA part lists none.