AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc B570 Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Arc B570
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc B570
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and Intel Arc B570 represent two distinct approaches to the mid-range graphics card market. The data shows a clear split in their performance profiles, with Intel’s Arc B570 taking the lead in the recorded direct comparison tests, while the AMD card posts a higher overall benchmark average. The RX 7650 GRE carries an average benchmark score of 42,723, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, while the Arc B570 averages 20,556, sitting in the 65th percentile. These figures, alongside their head-to-head results, reveal that the two cards are optimized for different workloads and usage scenarios.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded head-to-head benchmarks show Intel Arc B570 winning both direct comparisons. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Arc B570 scores 2,649 against the RX 7650 GRE’s 2,336, a delta of -11.8% from the AMD card’s perspective. This is a substantial margin in a modern DirectX 12 workload, indicating that Intel’s architecture handles this particular rendering scenario with notably higher efficiency. The second comparison, Geekbench OpenCL, is much closer: the Arc B570 scores 83,514 versus 83,109 for the RX 7650 GRE, a delta of only -0.5%. This near-tie in a general compute benchmark suggests that raw compute throughput is similar between the two, though Intel still edges ahead.
However, the broader benchmark database tells a different story regarding overall capability. The RX 7650 GRE’s average benchmark score of 42,723 is more than double the Arc B570’s 20,556. This large gap is driven by the AMD card’s performance in the Geekbench OpenCL test relative to its rivals, where it sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223, delta -1.2%) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, delta -1.2%). The Arc B570, by contrast, averages near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, delta 0.1%) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582, delta -0.1%). The RX 7650 GRE’s percentile ranking of 83 versus 65 for the Arc B570 further confirms that, across the full spectrum of recorded tests, the AMD card occupies a higher performance tier.
The Arc B570 does show additional strengths in the database beyond the two direct comparisons. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844 and PassMark G3D score of 14,195 indicate solid performance in those specific workloads. The RX 7650 GRE, while not having those exact tests recorded, compensates with a far higher average score, suggesting broader consistency across a wider range of benchmarks.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The RX 7650 GRE uses AMD’s RDNA 3.0 architecture, implemented on a 6 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 204 mm² and 13,300 million transistors. The Arc B570 uses Intel’s Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process, with a larger die of 272 mm² and 19,600 million transistors. Intel’s chip packs more transistors into a larger area, yielding a higher transistor density of 72.1M per mm² versus AMD’s 65.2M per mm².
Core configurations differ significantly. The RX 7650 GRE features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster output units (ROPs). The Arc B570 has 2,304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. In raw shading and texturing hardware, Intel has a clear numerical advantage. The Arc B570 also includes 18 ray tracing cores, while the RX 7650 GRE has 32 RT cores. Neither card lists tensor cores, so AI acceleration relies on their respective shader and RT hardware.
Clock speeds are another differentiator. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. The Arc B570 runs at a flat 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with no separate game clock recorded. AMD’s higher boost clock allows its RDNA 3.0 architecture to reach a peak FP32 throughput of 22.08 TFLOPS, while the Arc B570 delivers 11.52 TFLOPS in FP32. However, in FP16, the Arc B570 achieves 23.04 TFLOPS thanks to a 2:1 ratio, versus the RX 7650 GRE’s 1:1 ratio of 22.08 TFLOPS. This means Intel’s card excels in workloads that leverage FP16 precision, while AMD holds a substantial lead in standard FP32 compute.
Memory subsystems also diverge. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc B570 offers 10 GB of GDDR6 on a wider 160 bit bus, yielding 380.0 GB/s. Intel’s higher capacity and bandwidth are notable advantages for modern games and applications that are increasingly memory-hungry. Pixel and texture rates reflect these differences: the Arc B570 posts 200.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s, while the RX 7650 GRE records 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s. Intel’s higher ROP and TMU counts translate directly into higher fill rates.
Power consumption and physical design are similar in several respects. Both cards are dual-slot, use a single 8-pin power connector, and recommend a 450 W power supply. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, while the Arc B570 is lower at 150 W. The RX 7650 GRE is shorter at 204 mm (8 inches) versus the Arc B570’s 272 mm (10.7 inches), but both are 115 mm (4.5 inches) tall. Display outputs are identical, with 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, and both use a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. API support is also the same: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear split in use cases. The Intel Arc B570 wins both recorded head-to-head benchmarks, including a decisive 11.8% margin in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and a slim 0.5% edge in Geekbench OpenCL. Its higher memory capacity (10 GB versus 8 GB) and bandwidth (380.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s) give it a structural advantage in texture-heavy and high-resolution workloads. The Arc B570 also delivers higher pixel and texture rates, more shading units, and more ROPs, all of which contribute to its direct benchmark victories.
However, the RX 7650 GRE’s average benchmark score of 42,723 versus 20,556 for the Arc B570 indicates that, across the entire database, the AMD card performs in a much higher tier. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and Quadro M6000 24 GB, both with average scores around 43,200, and the RX 7650 GRE trails them by only 1.2%. The Arc B570, in contrast, sits alongside the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, with average scores near 20,500. The RX 7650 GRE’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the Arc B570’s 65th percentile confirms this positioning.
For users prioritizing the specific tests recorded in the head-to-head, the Arc B570 is the stronger choice. For those looking at overall average performance across a wide range of benchmarks, the RX 7650 GRE is clearly ahead. The Arc B570 also holds advantages in FP16 throughput (23.04 TFLOPS versus 22.08 TFLOPS), memory size, and memory bandwidth, while the RX 7650 GRE counters with higher FP32 performance, a higher boost clock, and more RT cores. Both cards are active products, with the Arc B570 released on 2025-01-15 and the RX 7650 GRE on 2025-02-06.
FAQ
Q: Which card wins the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?
A: The Intel Arc B570 wins with a score of 2,649, against 2,336 for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, a delta of -11.8% for the AMD card.
Q: How much memory does each card have?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6, while the Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6.
Q: What are the average benchmark scores for these GPUs?
A: The RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42,723, while the Arc B570 averages 20,556.
Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Intel Arc B570 delivers 11.52 TFLOPS.
Q: Do both cards use the same power connector?
A: Yes, both the RX 7650 GRE and the Arc B570 use a single 8-pin power connector and recommend a 450 W power supply.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?
A: The Intel Arc B570 has 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 288.0 GB/s.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The direct comparison tests between the two cards are limited to two entries, but they are telling. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Intel Arc B570 scores 2,649, outperforming the RX 7650 GRE’s 2,336 by 11.8%. This is a significant margin in a demanding DirectX 12 workload, likely reflecting the Arc B570’s higher ROP count (80 versus 64), higher pixel rate (200.0 GPixel/s versus 172.5 GPixel/s), and greater memory bandwidth (380.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s). The Arc B570’s 10 GB memory buffer also provides more headroom for large textures and geometry.
The Geekbench OpenCL test is much tighter. The Arc B570 scores 83,514, just 0.5% ahead of the RX 7650 GRE’s 83,109. This near-tie is consistent with the two cards’ comparable compute capabilities in OpenCL workloads, despite their architectural differences. The RX 7650 GRE’s higher FP32 throughput (22.08 TFLOPS) is offset by the Arc B570’s higher shading unit count (2,304 versus 2,048) and higher base clock (2500 MHz versus 1720 MHz). The result is a virtual draw in this general compute test.
Beyond these direct comparisons, the database provides context through each card’s nearest rivals. The RX 7650 GRE’s average score of 42,723 places it just 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223) and 1.3% behind the NVIDIA RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268). The Arc B570’s average of 20,556 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, delta 0.1%) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582, delta -0.1%). These rival comparisons show that the RX 7650 GRE competes in a substantially higher performance class than the Arc B570, even though the Arc B570 wins the two direct tests. The Arc B570 also records additional benchmarks not present for the RX 7650 GRE, including a Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844, a PassMark G3D score of 14,195, and a PassMark GPU Compute score of 7,281, indicating solid performance in those specific APIs and workloads.