AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc A530M Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the average benchmark scores of the Intel Arc A530M and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE compare?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has an average benchmark score of 46614, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE averages 42723. Despite the AMD part winning the head-to-head OpenCL test, the Intel GPU holds a higher overall average across the benchmark database, placing it in the 85th percentile versus the AMD card's 83rd percentile.

Q: Which GPU wins the only direct head-to-head benchmark available?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins the Geekbench OpenCL test decisively, scoring 83109 against the Intel Arc A530M's 49735. That represents a 40.2% advantage for the AMD card, as indicated by the negative deltaPct for the Intel part.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7650 GRE's average score of 42723 is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223) and 1.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262). It also trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268) by 1.3% and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301) by 1.3%.

Q: What are the transistor and die size differences between these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Arc A530M contains 11,500 million transistors on a larger 269 mm² die, resulting in a lower density of 42.8M per mm². Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE offers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is 64.0 GB/s higher than the Intel Arc A530M's 224.0 GB/s. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the AMD card runs its memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for the Intel.

Q: What is the difference in FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is over 5.5 times the Intel Arc A530M's 3.994 TFLOPS. The AMD card also achieves equal FP16 performance at 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the Intel part reaches 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the overwhelmingly faster GPU in raw compute. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 crushes the Intel Arc A530M's 49735 by 40.2%, and its FP32 throughput of 22.08 TFLOPS dwarfs the Intel part's 3.994 TFLOPS. Anyone prioritizing compute-heavy workloads, high-resolution gaming, or content creation should choose the AMD card without hesitation.

However, the Intel Arc A530M is not without merit. Its average benchmark score of 46614 actually surpasses the AMD card's 42723, placing it in the 85th percentile versus the 83rd for the RX 7650 GRE. This suggests the Intel GPU performs more consistently across a broader range of tests, even though it loses the single head-to-head comparison. The Intel part also consumes only 65 W TDP versus 170 W for the AMD card, making it the clear choice for thin-and-light laptops or systems with strict power budgets.

The verdict splits by use case: the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the performance king for demanding tasks and gaming, while the Intel Arc A530M suits efficiency-focused, portable systems where the 65 W power draw and integrated form factor (IGP) are decisive advantages. The RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot card requiring a 450 W power supply and an 8-pin connector, so it targets desktop builds. The Arc A530M, with its "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs, is engineered for mobile integration.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single available head-to-head benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, tells a one-sided story. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83109, while the Intel Arc A530M manages only 49735. The deltaPct of -40.2% indicates the Intel GPU trails by a massive margin in this compute-oriented test. This result aligns with the raw specification differences: the AMD card has 2048 shading units versus 1536 for Intel, 128 TMUs versus 96, and 64 ROPs versus 48.

Beyond the direct comparison, the average benchmark scores reveal a more nuanced picture. The Intel Arc A530M's average of 46614 edges out the RX 7650 GRE's 42723 by roughly 9%. The Intel GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46601, 0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46702, -0.2%), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043, 1.2%). In contrast, the RX 7650 GRE sits near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223, -1.2%) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, -1.2%).

This discrepancy suggests the Intel Arc A530M performs better in diverse benchmark scenarios, while the AMD card excels specifically in OpenCL compute. The RX 7650 GRE also has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336, a test the Intel part lacks, indicating strengths in modern DirectX 12 workloads that the OpenCL result alone does not capture.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply on nearly every specification. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE operates with a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2695 MHz, with a game clock of 2350 MHz. The Intel Arc A530M runs at just 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: AMD uses 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while Intel uses 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Pixel and texture rates show the AMD card's dominance: it achieves 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s, versus 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s for Intel. The FP32 gap is similarly wide at 22.08 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS. The AMD card draws 170 W TDP and requires a dual-slot cooler with a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The Intel part draws just 65 W and uses an IGP form factor with no power connector listed.

The RX 7650 GRE has measurable dimensions of 204 mm length and 115 mm height, while the Arc A530M lists no physical dimensions. Both use PCIe 4.0 x8 interfaces and support identical APIs: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Intel part's outputs are "Portable Device Dependent."

Architecture Differences

The architectures represent two fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on the Navi 33 chip, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The Intel Arc A530M uses the Xe-HPG architecture on the DG2-256 chip, part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile).

Transistor counts and die sizes reveal contrasting approaches. AMD crams 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die for a density of 65.2M per mm², while Intel spreads 11,500 million transistors across 269 mm² for 42.8M per mm². Both use TSMC's 6 nm process, but AMD's denser design enables higher clock speeds and compute throughput.

The AMD card features 32 ray tracing cores, significantly more than Intel's 12 RT cores. Shading units number 2048 for AMD versus 1536 for Intel, with corresponding advantages in TMUs (128 versus 96) and ROPs (64 versus 48). The RX 7650 GRE's FP16 performance matches its FP32 at 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the Intel part halves its FP16 rate to 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Neither GPU lists tensor cores. The RX 7650 GRE launched on February 6, 2025, with its predecessor listed as Navi II and successor as Navi IV, while the Arc A530M released on July 31, 2023, with no predecessor or successor listed.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE: This card wins decisively in compute performance. Its 40.2% OpenCL advantage over the Intel part makes it the obvious choice for GPU-accelerated rendering, scientific computing, and machine learning inference. The 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, combined with 32 RT cores, positions it strongly for ray-traced gaming and modern DirectX 12 titles, as evidenced by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336. The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and demanding workloads. Its 2695 MHz boost clock and 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate ensure smooth high-refresh-rate gaming. Desktop builders with a 450 W PSU and dual-slot space will find this the superior performer.

Intel Arc A530M: The Intel GPU wins on efficiency and portability. Its 65 W TDP is less than 40% of the AMD card's 170 W, making it suitable for laptops and compact systems where thermal and power constraints dominate. The IGP form factor and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs confirm its mobile-first design. Despite losing the OpenCL test, its higher average benchmark score of 46614 and 85th percentile ranking suggest better all-around consistency across varied workloads. The lower 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 are adequate for mainstream gaming and productivity. Users prioritizing battery life, slim chassis, or silent operation should choose the Arc A530M. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface matches the AMD card, so connectivity is not a differentiator.