AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data includes two shared benchmark results between the AMD Radeon 760M and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. In both tests, the RX 7650 GRE delivers a decisive victory.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 7650 GRE scores 2336, while the 760M scores 400. This represents an 82.9% gap in favor of the discrete card. The margin is substantial, and it reflects the difference in raw rendering throughput between the two parts.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 7650 GRE scores 83109, compared to 20255 for the 760M. The delta here is 75.6% in favor of the RX 7650 GRE. This is a compute-oriented workload, and the discrete card's advantage is again overwhelming.

The RX 7650 GRE wins both head-to-head matchups. The 760M records zero wins across the shared tests. The data shows no test where the integrated part comes out ahead.

Looking at the average benchmark scores from the database, the RX 7650 GRE sits at 42723, while the 760M averages 6019. The RX 7650 GRE holds the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, while the 760M sits at the 35th percentile. These percentile positions place the two parts in entirely different performance tiers.

The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, which scores 43223 and trails by 1.2%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262, also 1.2% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, 1.3% behind, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 1.3% behind. This places the RX 7650 GRE within a narrow band of high-end desktop and mobile parts.

The 760M's nearest rivals are clustered much closer. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 scores 6001, just 0.3% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M scores 6000, 0.3% ahead, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5996, 0.4% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro P2000 scores 6049, which is 0.5% behind the 760M. The integrated part sits in a crowded field of low-to-mid-range hardware.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7650 GRE wins in every category that the shared benchmarks cover. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a modern DirectX 12 rendering workload, it is 82.9% ahead of the 760M. In Geekbench OpenCL, a general-purpose compute test, it is 75.6% ahead. These are the only two direct comparisons available, and the discrete card dominates both.

The 760M does have a broader set of recorded benchmark entries in the database, including PassMark tests across DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12, plus G2D, G3D, and GPU compute. Its PassMark G3D score is 5310, and its PassMark GPU compute score is 2840. The RX 7650 GRE has no recorded PassMark entries, so no direct comparison is possible in those tests. The database shows the 760M's PassMark DirectX 9 score at 65, DirectX 10 at 19, DirectX 11 at 52, and DirectX 12 at 25. Its PassMark G2D score is 890.

The 760M also has a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336, while the RX 7650 GRE has no recorded Vulkan result. The 760M's Vulkan performance is substantially higher than its OpenCL result, suggesting the integrated part handles Vulkan workloads more efficiently than OpenCL. However, without a corresponding RX 7650 GRE Vulkan score, a direct comparison cannot be made.

The use-case split is therefore clear. The RX 7650 GRE is the choice for any workload covered by the shared tests: DirectX 12 gaming and OpenCL compute. The 760M, with its PassMark and Vulkan entries, shows it can handle legacy DirectX APIs and Vulkan, but the data does not include a head-to-head result in those areas.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs use the RDNA 3.0 architecture, but they are built on different process nodes and use different chips. The 760M uses the Phoenix chip on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

The 760M integrates 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 142.6 million per mm². The RX 7650 GRE packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a density of 65.2 million per mm². The integrated part has nearly double the transistor density due to the smaller process node, but the discrete card has a larger physical die.

The difference in shading resources is significant. The 760M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. The RX 7650 GRE has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. That is exactly four times the shading units, four times the TMUs, and four times the ROPs. Ray tracing cores go from 8 on the 760M to 32 on the RX 7650 GRE, again a 4x multiplier.

Clock speeds also differ. The 760M runs at a base clock of 800 MHz and boosts to 2599 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The discrete card starts at a much higher base frequency and maintains a higher boost.

Memory is a major architectural divider. The 760M uses system-shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The dedicated memory pool and fixed bandwidth give the discrete card a structural advantage in memory-bound workloads.

Pixel and texture rates confirm the gap. The 760M delivers 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute both sit at 5.323 TFLOPS for the 760M, while the RX 7650 GRE reaches 22.08 TFLOPS in both.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The 760M has a TDP of 15 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, is dual-slot, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and carries a suggested PSU of 450 W. The RX 7650 GRE measures 204 mm (8 inches) in length and 115 mm (4.5 inches) in height. The 760M's dimensions are not recorded.

The RX 7650 GRE has an 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer, a 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a 128-bit bus. The 760M shares system memory and has no dedicated VRAM. This alone explains much of the performance delta in the shared benchmarks.

Both cards use PCIe 4.0 x8, support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7650 GRE has its own display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The 760M's display outputs are motherboard dependent.

The RX 7650 GRE's launch MSRP is 279 USD. The 760M has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE than the AMD Radeon 760M in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The RX 7650 GRE scores 2336, while the 760M scores 400, a gap of 82.9% in favor of the RX 7650 GRE.

Q: Which GPU wins the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The RX 7650 GRE scores 83109, compared to 20255 for the 760M, a 75.6% advantage for the discrete card.

Q: Does the 760M have any benchmark where it beats the RX 7650 GRE?

A: No. In the two shared tests, the RX 7650 GRE wins both. The 760M records zero wins in head-to-head comparisons.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each GPU?

A: The 760M's closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6001, only 0.3% ahead. The RX 7650 GRE's closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER at 43223, which is 1.2% ahead.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The 760M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The 760M is rated at 15 W and uses no power connectors. The RX 7650 GRE is rated at 170 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the stronger GPU in every measurable shared test. Its 82.9% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 75.6% lead in Geekbench OpenCL are massive margins, and its 83rd percentile standing versus the 760M's 35th percentile confirms the separation in overall performance.

The 760M is an integrated part with 512 shading units, 15 W TDP, and system-shared memory. It is designed for low-power, motherboard-dependent operation. Its benchmark results place it near the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and AMD Radeon RX 6400, all within a 0.5% band. That is a very different performance class than the RX 7650 GRE, which competes with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and sits within 1.3% of that card.

For a user comparing these two directly, the RX 7650 GRE is the pick for any task involving the shared tests: DirectX 12 rendering and OpenCL compute. The 760M offers Vulkan support and a full set of PassMark entries, but no head-to-head result shows it ahead of the discrete card.

The architectural differences support the benchmark results. Four times the shading units, four times the TMUs, four times the ROPs, four times the ray tracing cores, dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory, and more than double the boost clock. The RX 7650 GRE has a 170 W TDP and needs a 450 W PSU, while the 760M runs at 15 W and needs no power connector. Anyone choosing between them must accept the power and cooling requirements of the discrete card to get its performance.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 760M | AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Phoenix | Navi 33 |

| Codename | None recorded | Hotpink Bonefish |

| Generation | Navi III IGP (Phoenix) | Navi III (RX 7000) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 25,390 million | 13,300 million |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 142.6M / mm² | 65.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 1720 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz | 2695 MHz |

| Game Clock | Not recorded | 2350 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 512 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 32 | 128 |

| ROPs | 16 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 41.58 GPixel/s | 172.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 83.17 GTexel/s | 345.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 / FP16 | 5.323 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 15 W | 170 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 450 W |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Length | Not recorded | 204 mm (8 inches) |

| Height | Not recorded | 115 mm (4.5 inches) |

| Release Date | 2024-01-30 | 2025-02-06 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | 279 USD |

| Predecessor | Navi II IGP | Navi II |

| Successor | None recorded | Navi IV |

| Percentile | 35 | 83 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 6019 | 42723 |