AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs NVIDIA B200 SXM6 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the NVIDIA B200 SXM6. The RX 7600S has ten individual benchmark scores, while the B200 SXM6 has no benchmark entries in the database. This absence of shared test data means a direct performance comparison cannot be constructed from measurements.

The RX 7600S achieves an average benchmark score of 16,696 across its tested workloads. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA T400 4 GB at 16,792 (0.6% ahead), the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 (1.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 at 16,504 (1.2% behind), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 at 16,932 (1.4% ahead). These deltas place the RX 7600S within a narrow performance band around its direct competitors.

The B200 SXM6 has an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 50, while the RX 7600S sits at the 60th percentile. The RX 7600S outperforms the B200 SXM6 in the only quantifiable metric available: it has a nonzero average score and a higher percentile rank. However, this comparison is misleading because the B200 SXM6 has no recorded benchmark data, so its percentile is derived from an empty dataset.

In individual tests, the RX 7600S shows its strongest results in Geekbench Vulkan with 73,868 points and Geekbench OpenCL with 68,012 points. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 1,888 points. PassMark results range from 74 in DirectX 10, 140 in DirectX 11, 65 in DirectX 12, 211 in DirectX 9, 776 in G2D, 15,408 in G3D, to 6,520 in GPU compute.

Without B200 SXM6 benchmark scores, any head-to-head numerical comparison remains impossible. The database records no wins for either product in direct competition. The RX 7600S has measurable data; the B200 SXM6 does not.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000 series. The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip built on Blackwell architecture and belongs to the Server Blackwell generation.

Manufacturing processes differ: the RX 7600S uses a 6 nm TSMC node, while the B200 SXM6 uses a 5 nm TSMC node. Transistor counts show a massive gap. The RX 7600S packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The B200 SXM6 contains 208,000 million transistors on a 1,628 mm² die, achieving 127.8 million transistors per square millimeter.

Memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B200 SXM6 has 180 GB of HBM3e on an 8,192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. Memory clock rates are similar at 2000 MHz, but effective rates differ: 16 Gbps for the RX 7600S versus 8 Gbps for the B200 SXM6.

Compute unit layouts diverge sharply. The RX 7600S has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores. The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, 592 texture mapping units, 24 raster output units, no dedicated ray tracing cores, and 592 tensor cores.

Rasterization rates reflect these differences. The RX 7600S achieves 140.8 GPixel/s and 246.4 GTexel/s. The B200 SXM6 reaches 43.92 GPixel/s but 1,083.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance also diverges: the RX 7600S delivers 15.77 TFLOPS FP32 and 31.54 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS FP32 and 69.34 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

Power and interface specifications differ substantially. The RX 7600S has a 75 W TDP, uses an IGP slot width, has no power connectors, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The B200 SXM6 has a 1000 W TDP, uses an SXM Module slot width, requires a 1400 W suggested PSU, and connects via PCIe 6.0 x16.

API support separates consumer from server design. The RX 7600S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B200 SXM6 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. Display outputs differ as well: the RX 7600S uses portable device dependent outputs, while the B200 SXM6 has no outputs.

Release timing shows the RX 7600S launched on 2023-01-03, with the B200 SXM6 following on 2024-10-31. The RX 7600S succeeds Polaris Mobile. The B200 SXM6 succeeds Server Hopper and has a successor listed as Server Rubin.

The Verdict

The data indicates these are not competing products. The RX 7600S is a mobile consumer GPU with measurable gaming-oriented benchmarks. The B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator with no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

For gaming and consumer graphics workloads, the RX 7600S is the only option with recorded performance data. Its 60th percentile ranking and average score of 16,696 provide a baseline for mobile graphics capability. The B200 SXM6 has no gaming benchmarks, no display outputs, and no consumer API support.

For compute-heavy server workloads, the B200 SXM6 holds clear architectural advantages: 180 GB of HBM3e memory, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, 69.34 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance, and 592 tensor cores. These specifications position it for data center tasks, though the database lacks benchmark confirmation.

Neutral analysis shows the RX 7600S wins in any measured comparison because the B200 SXM6 has no scores. But the physical specifications tell a different story: the B200 SXM6 has 15.8 times the transistors, 22.5 times the memory, 32 times the memory bandwidth, and 4.4 times the FP32 throughput. These are not rival products in the same market segment.

The percentile rankings reflect availability of data rather than performance. The RX 7600S at the 60th percentile has real benchmark results. The B200 SXM6 at the 50th percentile has no results, making its rank a placeholder.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600S | NVIDIA B200 SXM6 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell |

| Chip | Navi 33 | GB100 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 208,000 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 1,628 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 127.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 120 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 1830 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 180 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM3e |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 8192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 8.19 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 18944 |

| TMUs | 112 | 592 |

| ROPs | 64 | 24 |

| RT Cores | 28 | None listed |

| Tensor Cores | None listed | 592 |

| Pixel Rate | 140.8 GPixel/s | 43.92 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 246.4 GTexel/s | 1,083.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.77 TFLOPS | 69.34 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) | 69.34 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 1000 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | SXM Module |

| Power Connectors | None | Not listed |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 1400 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 6.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2024-10-31 |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, approximately 10.6 times the 1,792 shading units of the AMD Radeon RX 7600S.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The RX 7600S uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e on an 8,192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: The RX 7600S lists 28 ray tracing cores. The B200 SXM6 lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The RX 7600S has a 75 W TDP. The B200 SXM6 has a 1000 W TDP and requires a 1400 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores?

A: The B200 SXM6 has 592 tensor cores. The RX 7600S lists no tensor cores.

Q: Do both GPUs support consumer graphics APIs?

A: The RX 7600S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B200 SXM6 lists N/A for all three APIs.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S wins in consumer graphics contexts. It has measurable benchmark scores across DirectX 10, 11, 12, and 9 tests, plus OpenCL and Vulkan workloads. Its 60th percentile ranking versus all GPUs indicates it sits above the median for recorded graphics hardware. It supports standard display outputs, has no power connector requirement, and fits an IGP slot width suitable for mobile systems. Its 6 nm process and 75 W TDP make it practical for portable devices.

The RX 7600S also wins in pixel throughput with 140.8 GPixel/s versus the B200 SXM6's 43.92 GPixel/s. This suggests stronger traditional rasterization output per clock, despite having fewer shading units. Its 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing workloads, which the B200 SXM6 lacks entirely.

The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 wins in raw compute capacity. Its 69.34 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 performance exceeds the RX 7600S by a factor of 4.4 in FP32 and 2.2 in FP16. The 592 tensor cores enable matrix math acceleration absent from the RX 7600S. The 180 GB HBM3e memory with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth provides 22.5 times more capacity and 32 times more bandwidth than the RX 7600S.

The B200 SXM6 also wins in texture processing with 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 246.4 GTexel/s. Its PCIe 6.0 x16 interface doubles the bus generation of the RX 7600S's PCIe 4.0 x16. The 208,000 million transistor count and 127.8M / mm² density show a more advanced integration level than the RX 7600S's 13,300 million transistors and 65.2M / mm² density.

For server deployment, the B200 SXM6's SXM Module form factor and no display outputs align with accelerator card use. The RX 7600S's portable device dependent outputs and IGP slot width align with laptop or compact mobile designs.

The database records no wins for either product in direct competition because no head-to-head benchmarks exist. The practical choice depends on workload: the RX 7600S serves graphics rendering and display tasks, while the B200 SXM6 serves compute and tensor operations. The RX 7600S has a release date of 2023-01-03 and remains active. The B200 SXM6 has a release date of 2024-10-31, remains active, and lists a successor in Server Rubin.