AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Intel Arc Pro B70 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the Intel Arc Pro B70. The head-to-head table is empty, and neither GPU records any wins against the other in shared tests. This means a direct score comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

However, the AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a full suite of individual benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc Pro B70 has none recorded. The RX 7600S delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1888, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 68012, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 73868. In Passmark tests, it scores 74 in DirectX 10, 140 in DirectX 11, 65 in DirectX 12, and 211 in DirectX 9. Its Passmark G2D score is 776, G3D score is 15408, and GPU compute score is 6520.

The RX 7600S averages 16696 across all recorded benchmarks, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival in the database is the NVIDIA Tesla M4, which averages 16932, a delta of -1.4% relative to the RX 7600S. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB averages 16792, a -0.6% delta, while the NVIDIA T400 averages 16508, a +1.1% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 averages 16504, a +1.2% delta. These results indicate the RX 7600S sits in a tight performance cluster, with all four rivals within roughly 1.5% of its average score.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, with no rival data listed. The absence of benchmark entries for the B70 means its measured performance cannot be quantified against the RX 7600S or any other GPU in the database. The data confirms only that the RX 7600S has verified performance records, while the B70 does not.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation and the Radeon RX 7000 series. The Intel Arc Pro B70 uses the BMG-G31 chip built on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation.

Process technology differs significantly. The RX 7600S uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the B70 uses a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. The RX 7600S has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The B70 has an unknown transistor count but a larger 368 mm² die, with no density figure recorded.

Clock speeds show a clear gap. The RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. The B70 has a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks also differ: the RX 7600S runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the B70 runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is drastically different. The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The B70 has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.0 GB/s, more than double the bandwidth.

Compute resources favor the B70 heavily. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The B70 has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.

Pixel and texture rates follow the core counts. The RX 7600S achieves 140.8 GPixel/s and 246.4 GTexel/s. The B70 achieves 358.4 GPixel/s and 716.8 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 15.77 TFLOPS for the RX 7600S and 22.94 TFLOPS for the B70. FP16 throughput is 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) for the RX 7600S and 45.88 TFLOPS (2:1) for the B70.

Power and physical design differ completely. The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W, is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with no power connectors, and is portable device dependent for display outputs. The B70 has a TDP of 230 W, is dual-slot, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The B70 measures 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 39 mm in width. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RX 7600S uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The B70 offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates differ: the RX 7600S launched January 3, 2023, while the B70 is dated March 25, 2026. The RX 7600S has the predecessor Polaris Mobile and is listed as Active in production. The B70 lists no predecessor, successor, or production status.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload and platform. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S is a low-power integrated solution with a 75 W TDP, no power connectors, and portable device dependent outputs. It delivers verified benchmark scores across multiple tests, with an average of 16696 and a 60th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals sit within 1.5% of its average score, indicating it performs in a specific mid-range band.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 is a high-power discrete card with a 230 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, single 8-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. It has no recorded benchmarks, so its measured performance is unknown. Its specifications, however, show substantially higher raw resources: 4096 shading units versus 1792, 32 GB versus 8 GB, 608.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, and 22.94 TFLOPS versus 15.77 TFLOPS FP32.

From the recorded data, the RX 7600S is the only option with measurable performance. The B70 cannot be evaluated on benchmark results because none exist. For workloads that demand high memory capacity and bandwidth, the B70's 32 GB and 608.0 GB/s are superior on paper. For systems constrained to integrated graphics with minimal power draw, the RX 7600S is the only viable choice.

The B70 also carries a launch MSRP of 949 USD. The RX 7600S has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RX 7600S?

A: The NVIDIA Tesla M4 averages 16932 (-1.4% delta), the NVIDIA T400 4 GB averages 16792 (-0.6% delta), the NVIDIA T400 averages 16508 (+1.1% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 averages 16504 (+1.2% delta).

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The B70 has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDPs of these GPUs?

A: The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W and is an integrated graphics package with no power connectors. The B70 has a TDP of 230 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What process nodes do they use?

A: The RX 7600S uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The B70 uses a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S wins in portability and power efficiency. Its 75 W TDP, integrated design, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for systems where space and cooling are minimal. It has verified performance data across all recorded tests, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1888 and a Passmark G3D score of 15408. Its 60th percentile ranking and tight rival cluster confirm it delivers expected performance for its class.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 wins in raw specifications. Its 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs more than double the RX 7600S counts. Its 32 GB memory capacity and 608.0 GB/s bandwidth are four times the capacity and more than double the bandwidth. Its 22.94 TFLOPS FP32 output exceeds the RX 7600S by roughly 45%. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides double the bandwidth of the RX 7600S PCIe 4.0 x16. The B70 also offers dedicated display outputs with 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, whereas the RX 7600S outputs are portable device dependent.

For compute-heavy workloads that can use FP16, the B70 delivers 45.88 TFLOPS versus 31.54 TFLOPS for the RX 7600S. In ray tracing, the B70 has 32 RT cores versus 28, a smaller margin. The B70's larger die at 368 mm² versus 204 mm² suggests more complex silicon, though its transistor count is unknown.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs:

• Manufacturer: AMD vs Intel
• Chip: Navi 33 vs BMG-G31
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 vs Xe2-HPG
• Codename: Hotpink Bonefish vs none
• Generation: Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) vs Battlemage (Pro Series)
• Process node: 6 nm vs 5 nm
• Transistors: 13,300 million vs unknown
• Die size: 204 mm² vs 368 mm²
• Transistor density: 65.2M / mm² vs none
• Base clock: 1500 MHz vs 2280 MHz
• Boost clock: 2200 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• Game clock: 1865 MHz vs none
• Memory clock: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective)
• Memory size: 8 GB vs 32 GB
• Memory bus width: 128 bit vs 256 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 256.0 GB/s vs 608.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 1792 vs 4096
• TMUs: 112 vs 256
• ROPs: 64 vs 128
• RT cores: 28 vs 32
• Pixel rate: 140.8 GPixel/s vs 358.4 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 246.4 GTexel/s vs 716.8 GTexel/s
• FP32: 15.77 TFLOPS vs 22.94 TFLOPS
• FP16: 31.54 TFLOPS vs 45.88 TFLOPS
• TDP: 75 W vs 230 W
• Slot width: IGP vs Dual-slot
• Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin
• Suggested PSU: none vs 550 W
• Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 vs PCIe 5.0 x16
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent vs 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
• Dimensions: none vs 267 mm x 110 mm x 39 mm
• Production status: Active vs none
• Release date: 2023-01-03 vs 2026-03-25
• Predecessor: Polaris Mobile vs none
• Launch MSRP: none vs 949 USD
• Benchmark scores: all recorded vs none
• Percentile: 60 vs 50
• Average benchmark score: 16696 vs 0
• Nearest rivals: four listed vs none