AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a direct head-to-head comparison is not available for these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has ten benchmark results in the database, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible. However, the AMD part can be positioned against its nearest rivals, which provides useful context. The RX 7600S delivers an average benchmark score of 16696, placing it in the 60th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest competitor, the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, scores 16792, which puts the AMD part 0.6% behind. The RX 7600S sits 1.1% ahead of the standard NVIDIA T400 (16508) and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16504). Against the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932), the RX 7600S trails by 1.4%. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, with no rival data recorded.

The RX 7600S shows its strongest absolute result in the Geekbench Vulkan test, scoring 73868, followed by 68012 in Geekbench OpenCL. In Passmark G3D, it reaches 15408, and Passmark G2D shows 776. The DirectX tests are more modest: Passmark DirectX 9 records 211, DirectX 11 records 140, DirectX 10 records 74, and DirectX 12 records 65. The GPU compute score is 6520. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 1888. Without any Intel benchmark data, the head-to-head section must rely on these absolute figures for the AMD part and note the absence of comparable Intel measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The use-case split is dictated by the available data. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S wins in any scenario where a benchmark score is required, simply because it has recorded scores and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual does not. In the database, the RX 7600S is positioned for mobile graphics, as indicated by its IGP slot width and its generation label of Navi Mobile (RX 7000M). Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth suit mainstream laptop gaming and general compute tasks. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 73868 suggests strong API-level performance in cross-platform graphics workloads, while the OpenCL score of 68012 points to compute capability. The Passmark G3D score of 15408 indicates solid rasterization performance for its class.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual targets a different segment. It is a dual-slot desktop card with 24 GB GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, a substantial memory capacity that points toward professional or workstation use, such as large model loading or high-resolution asset creation. Its display outputs, 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, support multi-monitor professional setups. The absence of benchmarks means the database cannot assign wins to it in any measured workload. The data shows the AMD part as the only one with empirical performance evidence, while the Intel part wins on memory capacity and interface features by specification alone, not by test results.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. The process nodes differ: AMD uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. Transistor counts show Intel with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, while AMD packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die. Transistor density favors Intel at 72.1M per mm² versus AMD's 65.2M per mm².

Ray tracing hardware differs in count. The RX 7600S has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel part has 20. Neither part lists tensor cores. The shading unit count favors Intel at 2560 versus AMD's 1792. Texture mapping units also favor Intel, with 160 versus AMD's 112. Raster operation units show Intel at 80 versus AMD's 64. The pixel rate for Intel is 192.0 GPixel/s, while AMD achieves 140.8 GPixel/s. Texture rate for Intel is 384.0 GTexel/s, versus AMD's 246.4 GTexel/s. Despite having fewer ray tracing cores, Intel has higher raw throughput in pixel and texture rates due to its larger chip and higher clock speeds. FP32 performance tells a different story: AMD reaches 15.77 TFLOPS, while Intel reaches 12.29 TFLOPS. FP16 performance follows the same pattern, with AMD at 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) and Intel at 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1). The architecture differences show a trade-off: Intel offers more shading units and higher fill rates, but AMD delivers higher floating-point compute throughput.

Specification Differences

The specification tables show several clear differences beyond architecture. Clock speeds: the RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with a game clock of 1865 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks also differ: AMD runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while Intel runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective. Memory capacity is a major differentiator: AMD has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, while Intel has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. Bandwidth follows, with AMD at 256.0 GB/s and Intel at 456.0 GB/s.

Power and physical specs diverge sharply. The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W, is an IGP form factor, and uses no power connectors. The Intel part has a TDP of 400 W, is dual-slot, and uses a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 800 W. Bus interface differs: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x8. Display outputs: AMD lists portable device dependent outputs, while Intel provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1. Physical dimensions are only listed for Intel: 300 mm length, 110 mm height, 40 mm width. The RX 7600S has no dimension data. Release dates differ, with AMD released on 2023-01-03 and Intel on 2025-09-04. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. Both parts share the same DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support. The RX 7600S has a predecessor listed as Polaris Mobile, while the Intel part has no predecessor or successor listed. Both parts are marked as active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the performance difference between the two in benchmark scores?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696, with its highest single result being 73868 in Geekbench Vulkan.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W and uses no power connectors. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 800 W.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S reaches 15.77 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual reaches 12.29 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed.

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 456.0 GB/s bandwidth with a 192-bit bus, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600S has 256.0 GB/s bandwidth with a 128-bit bus.

Q: What are the physical form factors?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S is an IGP with no power connectors. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a dual-slot card measuring 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on intended use. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S is the only one of the two with empirical performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 16696 and 60th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirm it as a functional mobile graphics solution. The scores show it trades closely with the NVIDIA T400 series, sitting within 1.4% of those rivals in either direction. Its 75 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for laptops where power and space are constrained. The 8 GB memory capacity is modest but adequate for mainstream workloads, and the 15.77 TFLOPS FP32 output gives it a compute advantage over the Intel part on paper.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual presents a different proposition. Its 24 GB memory, 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 400 W TDP indicate a workstation-oriented card designed for large datasets and professional graphics tasks. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate are higher than the AMD part, which helps in fill-rate-bound scenarios. The dual-slot design, 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, and PCIe 5.0 x8 interface align with a professional multi-monitor environment. However, the absence of any benchmark results means the database cannot verify its actual performance. Its FP32 compute of 12.29 TFLOPS is lower than the AMD part, which could limit certain compute workloads.

For a buyer choosing strictly on measured data, the RX 7600S has the only recorded performance. For a buyer prioritizing memory capacity, bandwidth, and modern display connectivity, the Intel part offers specifications that the AMD part cannot match. The choice depends on whether the workload demands measured gaming or compute performance, which points to AMD, or large memory and professional output features, which points to Intel. The database cannot certify the Intel card's real-world speed, so any selection based on its specs carries that uncertainty.