AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither product has a wins tally listed. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT carries a substantial set of ten individual benchmark scores; the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark results at all. Its average benchmark score sits at 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which reflects an absence of measured data rather than a performance claim.

For the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, the database shows an average benchmark score of 12710 and a percentile versus all GPUs of 52. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 with an average score of 12773 and a delta of -0.5 percent, the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm with an average score of 12625 and a delta of 0.7 percent, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 with an average score of 12830 and a delta of -0.9 percent, and the AMD Radeon Pro 455 with an average score of 12831 and a delta of -0.9 percent. These deltas indicate that the RX 7600M XT sits within roughly one percent of each of these four GPUs, essentially a statistical tie across the board. The RX 7600M XT trails the GTX 670 by 0.5 percent, leads the Tesla K20Xm by 0.7 percent, trails the GTX 590 by 0.9 percent, and trails the Radeon Pro 455 by 0.9 percent. The spread among all five GPUs is only 1.6 percentage points from the lowest to the highest average score.

Looking at the individual benchmark scores for the RX 7600M XT, the highest recorded result is in Geekbench OpenCL at 74869 points. The Geekbench Vulkan score is 27793 points. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7600M XT scores 2048 points. The Passmark G3D score is 13907, while the Passmark G2D score is 894. The Passmark GPU Compute score is 7140. For the legacy DirectX tests, the Passmark DirectX 9 score is 175, the DirectX 11 score is 137, the DirectX 10 score is 76, and the DirectX 12 score is 58. These scores show a GPU that delivers its strongest results in compute-oriented workloads and modern API tests, with the OpenCL result far exceeding the Vulkan and DX12 figures.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores in the database, no nearest rivals listed, and no wins recorded. Any direct performance comparison between the two cards cannot be substantiated from measured data. The RX 7600M XT is the only one of the two with a measurable performance profile, and its placement near the 52nd percentile of all GPUs indicates mid-pack standing among the broader database population.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation, specifically the RX 7000M series, and its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on the TrueGPU architecture, belongs to the 7G100 generation, and has no codename, predecessor, or successor listed. Its process node is also 6 nm at TSMC, but its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown. Both cards share the same foundry and process node, which means the fundamental manufacturing technology is identical, but the chip designs diverge entirely.

The RX 7600M XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and no ray tracing cores or tensor cores listed. The LX ULTRA therefore has triple the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs of the RX 7600M XT. The RX 7600M XT carries dedicated ray tracing hardware, while the LX ULTRA has none recorded. For API support, both cards list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RX 7600M XT lists Vulkan 1.4 while the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3.

Clock speeds differ sharply. The RX 7600M XT has a base clock of 1280 MHz, a boost clock of 2469 MHz, and a game clock of 2023 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock listed. Both cards run their memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, but the RX 7600M XT uses an 8 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has three times the memory capacity, 1.5 times the bus width, and exactly 1.5 times the bandwidth.

Pixel and texture rates also favor the LX ULTRA. The RX 7600M XT has a pixel rate of 158.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 316.0 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA is 21.5 percent ahead in pixel rate and the same 21.5 percent ahead in texture rate. Floating point performance follows the same pattern: the RX 7600M XT delivers 20.23 TFLOPS in FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS in FP16 (2:1), while the LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16 (2:1). The LX ULTRA is 21.5 percent ahead in both FP32 and FP16 throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory capacity?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The LX ULTRA has three times the capacity.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The LX ULTRA has a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600M XT has a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA delivers 1.5 times the bandwidth.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. Both also list OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600M XT lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 32 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no ray tracing cores listed in the database.

Q: What is the power consumption of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W and uses no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: How do the benchmark scores compare?

A: The RX 7600M XT has an average benchmark score of 12710 across ten tests, with a percentile of 52. The LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores recorded, an average score of 0, and a percentile of 50.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database.

The RX 7600M XT belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series from AMD, uses the Navi 33 chip, RDNA 3.0 architecture, and carries the codename Hotpink Bonefish. The LX ULTRA has no series, no codename, and lists its manufacturer as Unknown. Its chip is the 7G105 and its architecture is TrueGPU.

Process node and foundry are identical: both use 6 nm at TSMC. Transistor count differs: the RX 7600M XT has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the LX ULTRA has unknown transistor count and die size. Transistor density is 65.2M / mm² for the RX 7600M XT, and null for the LX ULTRA.

Clock speeds are fully specified for the RX 7600M XT: base 1280 MHz, boost 2469 MHz, game 2023 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock listed. Memory clocks match at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for both.

Memory configuration is a major differentiator. The RX 7600M XT has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute unit counts differ substantially. The RX 7600M XT has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no ray tracing cores. Neither has tensor cores listed.

Pixel and texture rates: the RX 7600M XT delivers 158.0 GPixel/s and 316.0 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

Floating point performance: the RX 7600M XT delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Power and physical specifications diverge significantly. The RX 7600M XT has a 120 W TDP, is an IGP slot width with no power connectors, and has no dimensions listed. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, is dual-slot, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, has a suggested PSU of 550 W, and measures 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm. Display outputs also differ: the RX 7600M XT is listed as Portable Device Dependent, while the LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

API support mostly matches: both have DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600M XT lists Vulkan 1.4, the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3.

Release dates are far apart. The RX 7600M XT has a release date of January 3, 2023. The LX ULTRA has a release date of March 16, 2026. Neither has a launch MSRP listed.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on raw specification throughput. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs give it a 21.5 percent advantage in pixel rate and texture rate over the RX 7600M XT. Its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS are both 21.5 percent higher. The 24 GB memory capacity is triple that of the RX 7600M XT, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is 1.5 times higher. The 192-bit bus provides a wider memory path. For workloads that scale with shading throughput, texture fill, or memory capacity, the LX ULTRA has the structural advantage on paper.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT wins on measured performance and feature completeness. It has a full set of ten benchmark scores in the database, an average score of 12710, and a percentile of 52. The LX ULTRA has no measured scores at all. The RX 7600M XT also has 32 ray tracing cores, which the LX ULTRA lacks entirely. Vulkan support is newer at version 1.4 versus 1.3. The RX 7600M XT draws 120 W versus 225 W, uses no power connectors versus a 16-pin connector, and fits as an IGP rather than a dual-slot card. For ray tracing workloads, the RX 7600M XT is the only one of the two with the required hardware. For power-constrained environments, the 120 W TDP is far more modest.

The nearest rival data for the RX 7600M XT shows it clustered within one percent of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670, Tesla K20Xm, GeForce GTX 590, and AMD Radeon Pro 455. This places its measured performance in a well-understood range. The LX ULTRA has no comparable positioning data available.

The Verdict

The database paints an incomplete picture for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. It has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, no average score, and no wins recorded. Its 50th percentile figure is a placeholder for missing data, not a performance result. What the database does show is a card with a large specification footprint: 6144 shading units, 24 GB of GDDR6, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, a 192-bit bus, and a 225 W TDP. Those specifications are all recorded, and they are uniformly higher than the corresponding figures for the RX 7600M XT. The LX ULTRA is also built on the same 6 nm TSMC process, so its larger compute configuration does not come from a more advanced manufacturing node.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is the only one of the two with an actual measured performance profile. Its average score of 12710 places it at the 52nd percentile of all GPUs, and its deltas to four nearest rivals all fall within 0.9 percent. It also carries ray tracing hardware, a feature the LX ULTRA lacks. Its 120 W TDP, IGP form factor, and absence of power connectors make it suitable for compact or portable systems. The LX ULTRA, by contrast, is a dual-slot card requiring a 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, with a 268 mm length.

For a user who needs a GPU with verified benchmark results, ray tracing capability, and lower power draw, the RX 7600M XT is the only choice supported by measured data. For a user who prioritizes raw specification ceilings, the LX ULTRA offers more shading units, more memory, more bandwidth, and higher throughput figures on paper. However, the absence of any benchmark scores for the LX ULTRA means its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the database. The RX 7600M XT has a proven performance baseline; the LX ULTRA has a promising specification sheet with no measured validation. The data supports choosing the RX 7600M XT for verified performance and feature set, and considering the LX ULTRA only if the specification advantages are compelling enough to offset the lack of benchmark evidence.