AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in overall benchmark standing?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT holds a 52nd percentile ranking against all GPUs in the database, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 12,710 across recorded tests; the Lisuan part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What is the difference in memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. The Lisuan part provides 50% more memory capacity and 50% more bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Lisuan part leads by roughly 21% in both FP32 and FP16 compute.

Q: Are the two GPUs built on the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes, both are fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node. The AMD chip is Navi 33 with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die; the Lisuan chip is 7G106, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database.

Q: What are the power and cooling requirements?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a 120 W TDP, is an integrated form factor (IGP), and requires no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, is a dual-slot card, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU rating of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish" and generation designation "Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)". The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip under the "TrueGPU" architecture, with the generation label "7G100". The manufacturers differ: AMD for the RX 7600M XT, while the Lisuan part's manufacturer is listed as Unknown.

The AMD GPU packs 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is configured with 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, which is three times the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs of the AMD part. However, the Lisuan GPU has no ray tracing cores listed in the database, while the AMD part has 32.

Both GPUs use GDDR6 memory, but the Lisuan part uses a wider 192-bit interface compared to the AMD part's 128-bit bus. The Lisuan card is a dual-slot discrete solution with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the AMD RX 7600M XT is an integrated form factor with display outputs described as "Portable Device Dependent". The AMD part interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16, and the Lisuan part also uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT draws 120 W. The power delivery differs accordingly: the Lisuan card needs a single 8-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, while the AMD part has no power connectors. The Lisuan card measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width; the AMD part has no listed dimensions, consistent with its IGP form factor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The Lisuan part has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of zero. The AMD part, however, has a full set of recorded scores across multiple test suites.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT scores 2,048 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 74,869 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 27,793 in Geekbench Vulkan. In Passmark tests, it records 76 in DirectX 10, 137 in DirectX 11, 58 in DirectX 12, 175 in DirectX 9, 894 in G2D, 13,907 in G3D, and 7,140 in GPU Compute. Its average benchmark score is 12,710.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the AMD part's performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 has an average score of 12,773, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7600M XT. The NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm scores 12,625, putting it 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 scores 12,830, which is 0.9% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro 455 scores 12,831, also 0.9% higher. These deltas place the RX 7600M XT in a narrow band around its closest competitors, with the AMD Radeon Pro 455 being the only AMD rival in this group.

Since the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark scores, no direct comparison of measured performance is possible. The recorded data shows zero wins for either part in head-to-head tests. The compute specifications suggest the Lisuan part has higher theoretical throughput, but the absence of benchmark data prevents any empirical confirmation.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Codename | Hotpink Bonefish | None |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Unknown |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | None |

| Shading Units | 2,048 | 6,144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 32 | None |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Pixel Rate | 158.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 316.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 20.23 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 40.45 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 120 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2026-06-17 |

| Length | None | 294 mm |

| Height | None | 120 mm |

| Width | None | 49 mm |

| Average Benchmark Score | 12,710 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 52 | 50 |

Both GPUs share the 6 nm TSMC process, GDDR6 memory type, 2250 MHz memory clock with 18 Gbps effective speed, PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, and OpenGL 4.6 support.

The Verdict

The data shows two GPUs at different stages of validation. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has extensive benchmark coverage, with an average score of 12,710 and a 52nd percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals cluster within 0.9% of its average score, indicating the RX 7600M XT sits in a tightly competitive performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GTX 590 score 0.5% higher and 0.9% higher respectively, while the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm trails by 0.7% and the AMD Radeon Pro 455 leads by 0.9%.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents a different profile. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on no recorded benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score is zero. The specification sheet indicates substantially higher theoretical resources: 6,144 shading units versus 2,048, 192 TMUs versus 128, 96 ROPs versus 64, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 20.23 TFLOPS. Memory capacity and bandwidth also favor the Lisuan part, with 12 GB and 432.0 GB/s versus 8 GB and 288.0 GB/s.

The AMD part is the only one with measured results. It is an integrated, low-power solution at 120 W with no power connectors, suited to portable devices. The Lisuan part is a 225 W dual-slot card requiring an 8-pin connector and a 550 W PSU, with dimensions of 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm. It offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the AMD part's outputs are device-dependent.

For users requiring verified performance data, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has the advantage of a complete benchmark record. Its 52nd percentile ranking places it above half of all GPUs in the database. For users prioritizing raw specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 shows higher compute, memory, and pixel throughput in every listed category, though none of that is confirmed by benchmark scores. The Lisuan part also has a later release date of 2026-06-17 versus 2023-01-03 for the AMD part.

The choice depends on whether measured performance or listed specifications take priority. The AMD part delivers confirmed results in a compact, low-power package. The Lisuan part offers a larger memory pool, wider bus, and higher theoretical throughput in a full-size card format, but the database contains no evidence of its actual performance.