AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, placing it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking. This means the only direct numerical comparison available is the AMD part's standing against its nearest rivals, none of which is the Intel card.

The RX 7600M sits within a tight cluster of comparable GPUs. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (average score 63,830) by 0.1 percent, and it trails the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (63,842) by 0.1 percent as well. Against the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (64,212), the RX 7600M is 0.7 percent behind. It edges out the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693) by 0.1 percent. These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the RX 7600M delivers compute performance essentially identical to that of several desktop and professional cards in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark entries to compare. Its percentile ranking of 50 suggests the database treats it as a median performer, but without measured scores, any head-to-head numerical walkthrough is impossible. The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, and the wins counters for both cards are zero.

What can be stated from the data is that the RX 7600M's single recorded OpenCL score of 63,775 is its only measured performance point. That score positions it firmly in the upper tier of all GPUs tracked, well above the median. The Intel card's lack of recorded scores means the database cannot substantiate a performance comparison between these two specific products.

The nearest rival deltas for the RX 7600M show a spread of only 0.8 percentage points from its closest competitor (the CMP 30HX at 63,842) to the Pro WX 9100. Such tight margins suggest that in OpenCL compute workloads, the RX 7600M is functionally interchangeable with these rivals in raw score terms.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply in their underlying designs. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation of the RX 7000M series. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip on Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series.

Manufacturing processes differ. AMD uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while Intel also uses TSMC but at 5 nm. The Intel chip is larger and denser: it packs 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The AMD chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, for a density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. Intel's die is 68 mm² larger and carries 6,300 million more transistors.

Core configurations favor the Intel card in sheer count. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Intel holds a 44.6 percent advantage in shading units, a 42.9 percent lead in TMUs, and a 25 percent lead in ROPs. Ray tracing core counts invert this: AMD has 28 ray tracing cores, while Intel has 20. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Clock speeds are close. The Intel card has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD card has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. Intel's base clock is 33.3 percent higher, but the boost clocks are nearly identical, with AMD ahead by 10 MHz. Memory clocks differ: AMD runs its memory at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while Intel runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations are starkly different. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s. That is triple the capacity and 78.1 percent more bandwidth. The Intel card's bandwidth advantage stems from both a wider bus and faster effective memory speed.

Compute throughput tells a different story. The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 34.55 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1). The Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16. AMD leads by 40.5 percent in FP32 and 40.6 percent in FP16, despite having fewer shading units. This indicates higher per-shader efficiency in the RDNA 3.0 design. Pixel and texture rates also favor Intel in absolute terms: Intel achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, versus AMD's 154.2 GPixel/s and 269.9 GTexel/s. Intel leads by 24.5 percent in pixel rate and 42.3 percent in texture rate.

Power and physical design diverge dramatically. The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, is an integrated graphics package (IGP), requires no power connectors, and has a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device dependent. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W, is a dual-slot card measuring 300 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and recommends an 800 W power supply. It uses PCIe 5.0 x8 and offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Intel card consumes 310 W more, a 344.4 percent higher TDP.

API support is identical on paper: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates differ by years: AMD's card launched on January 3, 2023, while Intel's launched on September 4, 2025. Both are listed as Active in production status. AMD's predecessor is Polaris Mobile; Intel lists no predecessor. The Intel card has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload type. For raw compute throughput per watt, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the stronger part. It delivers 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 at a 90 W TDP, while the Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS at 400 W. In efficiency terms, AMD produces roughly 191.9 GFLOPS per watt, while Intel produces about 30.7 GFLOPS per watt. That is a 6.2-fold efficiency advantage for AMD.

For memory capacity and bandwidth, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual dominates. Its 24 GB frame buffer and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth overshadow the RX 7600M's 8 GB and 256.0 GB/s. Applications that require large datasets resident in VRAM, or that saturate memory bandwidth, will favor the Intel card. The RX 7600M cannot hold a fraction of the same data locally.

The benchmark database records only one measured score, from the RX 7600M, at 63,775 OpenCL points. That score sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs tracked, and it lands within 0.7 percent of the nearest rival scores. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded scores and a 50th percentile ranking, so its actual compute performance in these same tests remains unmeasured. The verdict must reflect that asymmetry: AMD has verified performance data; Intel does not.

Form factor matters. The RX 7600M is an IGP with no power connectors, suited to compact portable systems. The Arc Pro B60 Dual is a 400 W, dual-slot, 300 mm card requiring a 16-pin connector and an 800 W power supply. Any system built around the Intel card must accommodate its size, cooling, and power demands. The AMD part imposes none of those constraints.

The launch dates and prices also differ. AMD released its card in January 2023 with no recorded launch MSRP. Intel released its card in September 2025 with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The absence of an AMD MSRP prevents a direct price comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the RX 7600M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1 percent, the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1 percent, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7 percent. It leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1 percent.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each card?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units, while the AMD RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units.

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS FP32, compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS.

Q: What power connector does the Intel card require?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses a single 16-pin power connector and recommends an 800 W power supply. The RX 7600M requires no power connectors.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M wins on compute density and efficiency. Its 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 output at 90 W TDP, combined with its 89th percentile benchmark ranking and verified OpenCL score of 63,775, makes it the clear choice for compute-heavy tasks where power and space are constrained. Its 28 ray tracing cores exceed Intel's 20, suggesting an advantage in ray-traced workloads, though no direct benchmark confirms this. The card's 6 nm process, smaller die, and lower transistor count also point to a more power-frugal design.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on memory and bandwidth. Its 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is three times larger, and its 456.0 GB/s bandwidth is 78.1 percent higher. Its 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs give it raw throughput advantages in texture-heavy and pixel-heavy rendering. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate exceed AMD's figures by 24.5 percent and 42.3 percent, respectively. Its PCIe 5.0 x8 interface and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs also provide connectivity that AMD's portable-device-dependent outputs cannot match.

The RX 7600M wins on portability. It is an IGP with no power connectors, no slot width, and no listed dimensions. The Arc Pro B60 Dual is a 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, 40 mm wide dual-slot card that requires a 16-pin power connector and an 800 W power supply.

The Intel card wins on longevity in the database's release timeline, launching in September 2025 versus AMD's January 2023 release. Both remain Active in production status.

For users who rely on measured performance data, the RX 7600M is the only card with a benchmark score. For users who need large memory capacity and high bandwidth in a professional rendering context, the Arc Pro B60 Dual offers specifications that the AMD card cannot approach, despite its lack of recorded scores.