AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Intel Arc Pro B390 Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the AMD Radeon RX 7600M as the higher-performing mobile graphics solution. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 places it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 registers a 50th percentile standing with no benchmark entries in the database. The RX 7600M delivers roughly 2.25 times the FP32 compute of the Arc Pro B390, 17.27 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS, and more than double the pixel and texture throughput. Users requiring sustained compute performance in a mobile platform should select the AMD part. The Intel part targets configurations where system-shared memory and lower power draw are prioritized, though its measured performance data is absent. The RX 7600M also sits within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 in average score, indicating it competes with professional workstation parts from the previous generation. The Arc Pro B390 has no nearest rivals recorded, so its relative standing cannot be quantified beyond its percentile placement.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die measures 204 mm² and contains 13,300 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation of the RX 7000M series, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. Its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 relies on the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated by Intel on a 3 nm process. The database records no die size, transistor count, or density for this part. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation tied to Panther Lake, with its predecessor listed as HD Graphics-WM. The manufacturing node difference is substantial: 6 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel, though the AMD part packs far more transistors onto a dedicated die while the Intel part uses system-shared memory.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither includes tensor cores in the recorded specifications. Both use integrated-style packaging with no power connectors and are listed as IGP slot width, meaning they are designed for portable devices. The RX 7600M connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc Pro B390 uses an IGP bus interface, consistent with its system-shared memory design.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries comparing the AMD Radeon RX 7600M and Intel Arc Pro B390. The wins counters for both parts are zero. However, the available individual measurements allow a meaningful comparison.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63,830, a 0.1% gap; the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63,842, also 0.1% ahead; the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693, which trails by 0.1%; and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64,212, which leads by 0.7%. The RX 7600M thus sits within a tight cluster of GPUs scoring between roughly 63,700 and 64,200, indicating it is competitive with both gaming and professional parts. The 89th percentile ranking confirms it outperforms the vast majority of recorded GPUs.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmark scores, no average benchmark score (0), and no nearest rivals. Its 50th percentile placement represents a median position among all GPUs in the database, but without any actual measurement, the percentile cannot be tied to a specific performance level. The data shows the Arc Pro B390 delivers 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 120.0 GTexel/s texture fill, and 60.00 GPixel/s pixel fill. The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS, 269.9 GTexel/s, and 154.2 GPixel/s respectively. In raw throughput terms, the RX 7600M leads by approximately 125% in FP32, 125% in texture rate, and 157% in pixel rate.

The FP16 figures follow the same pattern: the RX 7600M reaches 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) while the Arc Pro B390 reaches 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1), again roughly a 2.25 times advantage for AMD. The RX 7600M also provides 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Arc Pro B390 relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The memory clock on the RX 7600M is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective throughput.

Clock behavior differs significantly. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The Arc Pro B390 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with no game clock recorded. The Intel part boosts 90 MHz higher, but its base clock is 1200 MHz lower, and its lower core counts limit throughput. The RX 7600M uses 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B390 uses 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. AMD holds advantages of 256 shading units, 64 TMUs, 40 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores.

Power consumption favors Intel. The Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W, while the RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W. The difference is 10 W, and for mobile platforms where thermal headroom is constrained, the Intel part draws less power. The RX 7600M compensates with a dedicated memory subsystem, eliminating the need to share system memory bandwidth. The Arc Pro B390's system-shared memory means its performance depends on the host platform's memory configuration, which the database records as System Dependent.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every recorded specification. The manufacturing process is 6 nm for AMD versus 3 nm for Intel. The RX 7600M uses a dedicated Navi 33 die with a known size of 204 mm² and 13,300 million transistors; the Arc Pro B390 has unknown die size and transistor count. The RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Arc Pro B390 uses Xe3-LPG. The RX 7600M belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series with the Navi Mobile generation, while the Arc Pro B390 belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation.

Memory configuration is fundamentally different. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B390 uses system-shared memory for size, type, bus width, and bandwidth, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. The RX 7600M memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the Arc Pro B390 memory clock is listed as System Shared. The RX 7600M uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface; the Arc Pro B390 uses IGP.

Core counts differ across all categories: 1792 shading units versus 1536, 112 TMUs versus 48, 64 ROPs versus 24, and 28 ray tracing cores versus 12. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a game clock of 2070 MHz; the Arc Pro B390 has a base clock of 300 MHz and no game clock. The boost clocks are close, 2410 MHz for AMD and 2500 MHz for Intel.

Throughput rates favor AMD substantially. The RX 7600M delivers 154.2 GPixel/s and 269.9 GTexel/s, while the Arc Pro B390 delivers 60.00 GPixel/s and 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 17.27 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 34.55 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS. TDP is 90 W for AMD and 80 W for Intel. The RX 7600M released on 2023-01-03, while the Arc Pro B390 released on 2026-01-26. Both parts are marked as Active in production status. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7600M trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1%, trails the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1%, leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1%, and trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7%.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B390 uses system-shared memory for capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth, with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do the compute capabilities compare?

A: The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16. The Arc Pro B390 delivers 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 and 15.36 TFLOPS FP16. Both use a 2:1 FP16 ratio.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W. The Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W. Neither uses external power connectors.

Q: When were these GPUs released?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M released on 2023-01-03. The Intel Arc Pro B390 released on 2026-01-26. Both are currently marked as Active in production status.