AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Intel Arc A310E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two mobile-class graphics processors into very different performance tiers. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M holds a clear advantage in raw compute workloads, as demonstrated by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 points. That places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc A310E, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and sits at the 50th percentile. The RX 7600M's win is not marginal; it represents a fundamental gap in shading throughput, texture processing, and memory bandwidth.

The use-case split is straightforward from the data. The RX 7600M is positioned for tasks that demand sustained compute throughput: modern game rendering at higher settings, ray-traced workloads, and content creation with large textures or high-resolution frame buffers. Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth give it the headroom for such tasks. The Arc A310E, with 4 GB GDDR6 and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, is better matched to lighter workloads: embedded or low-profile systems, multi-display output for professional environments, and tasks where the 75 W power envelope and single-slot form factor are priorities.

The database shows no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two parts, so the comparison must rely on the individual recorded metrics. The RX 7600M wins every measurable compute category. The Arc A310E wins on physical dimensions, power draw, and form factor flexibility, making it the choice for space-constrained or power-constrained deployments rather than raw performance.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation under the RX 7000M series. The Intel Arc A310E uses the DG2-128 chip based on Xe-HPG architecture, from the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. Both are manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, which is one of the few shared traits between them.

The transistor counts differ substantially. The RX 7600M packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Arc A310E contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The AMD chip is larger in both absolute and density terms, which correlates with its higher compute resource counts.

The execution resources diverge sharply. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc A310E has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 6 ray tracing cores. The AMD part carries more than double the shader count and nearly four times the TMU count. This explains the computed throughput figures: the RX 7600M reaches 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the Arc A310E achieves 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Clock behavior also differs. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The Arc A310E runs at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost, with memory at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The AMD part's boost headroom is significant, allowing it to stretch well beyond its base frequency under load.

Memory configurations are another major split. The RX 7600M uses an 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s. The Arc A310E uses 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s. The AMD part has twice the memory capacity and twice the bandwidth. The bus interfaces also differ: PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RX 7600M versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for the Arc A310E. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Physical design separates them further. The RX 7600M is listed as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and no slot width specification, meaning it is portable-device dependent for display outputs. The Arc A310E is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, with four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. It draws power from the slot, requiring no external connectors, and its suggested PSU is 250 W. The RX 7600M carries a 90 W TDP, while the Arc A310E draws 75 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the RX 7600M versus the Arc A310E. The only recorded benchmark for either part is the RX 7600M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. The Arc A310E has an empty benchmark list and an average score of 0, which means no comparable measurement exists.

However, the RX 7600M's score can be interpreted through its nearest rivals in the database. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830, a delta of -0.1% relative to the RX 7600M, meaning the RX 7600M is effectively tied with that card. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63,842, also -0.1% from the RX 7600M. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693, a delta of +0.1%, meaning the RX 7600M sits marginally above it. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64,212, a delta of -0.7%, putting the RX 7600M slightly behind that workstation card. These deltas are all within 1%, indicating the RX 7600M occupies a narrow performance band among mid-range to upper-mid-range GPUs.

The Arc A310E has no rival data, so no deltas can be computed. The only quantitative statement available is that its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs in the database. Given the RX 7600M's 89th percentile rank, the performance gap between the two is substantial, though the exact percentage cannot be derived from the available fields.

The pixel and texture rates reinforce the gap. The RX 7600M achieves 154.2 GPixel/s and 269.9 GTexel/s. The Arc A310E achieves 32.00 GPixel/s and 64.00 GTexel/s. The AMD part is roughly 4.8 times faster in pixel fill and 4.2 times faster in texture fill, based on the recorded figures. These are the largest numerical deltas in the comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775. The Intel Arc A310E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What are the power draws?

A: The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP. The Arc A310E has a 75 W TDP and lists a 250 W suggested PSU.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the form factor difference?

A: The RX 7600M is an IGP with no slot width and no power connectors. The Arc A310E is a single-slot card at 168 mm length, 69 mm height, and 20 mm width, with four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Q: What production status do the two GPUs have?

A: The RX 7600M is listed as Active. The Arc A310E is listed as End-of-life.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs share only a few specifications: both are 6 nm TSMC parts, both use GDDR6 memory, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both have no tensor cores and no external power connectors. Every other field in the database differs.

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600M | Intel Arc A310E |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | Navi 33 | DG2-128 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) | Alchemist (Arc 3) |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 7,200 million |

| Die size | 204 mm² | 157 mm² |

| Transistor density | 65.2M / mm² | 45.9M / mm² |

| Base clock | 1500 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2410 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Game clock | 2070 MHz | None |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory bus | 128 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 124.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1792 | 768 |

| TMUs | 112 | 32 |

| ROPs | 64 | 16 |

| Ray tracing cores | 28 | 6 |

| Pixel rate | 154.2 GPixel/s | 32.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 269.9 GTexel/s | 64.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.27 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 90 W | 75 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Suggested PSU | None | 250 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |

| Dimensions | None listed | 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm |

| Production status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release date | 2023-01-03 | 2024-03-31 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Xe Graphics |

| Successor | None | Battlemage |

| Benchmark score | 63,775 | None |

| Percentile | 89 | 50 |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of roles. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the compute-focused part. Its 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 8 GB frame buffer place it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival data shows it trading blows with cards like the RX 9060 XT LP, CMP 30HX, and Radeon Pro Vega 56, all within 0.1% to 0.7% deltas. It is an active product, released in January 2023, and remains in production.

The Intel Arc A310E is the deployment-focused part. Its 75 W TDP, single-slot profile, 168 mm length, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs make it suitable for systems where physical space and power delivery are constrained. Its fixed 2000 MHz clock simplifies thermal management. It is end-of-life, released in March 2024, with the successor named Battlemage. Its 50th percentile rank and empty benchmark list mean the database cannot confirm any compute advantage for this part.

The choice between them depends on the workload. For rendering, gaming, or compute tasks where performance is the sole criterion, the RX 7600M is the only option with recorded data supporting it. For multi-display professional setups, embedded systems, or low-power deployments where a compact card with DisplayPort outputs is required, the Arc A310E has the form factor and connectivity that the RX 7600M lacks, since the latter's display outputs are portable-device dependent. The RX 7600M is the stronger GPU by every measured compute metric; the Arc A310E is the more flexible physical package.