AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win counts are zero for both parts. This is an unusual situation for a comparison page, because it means the analysis must lean entirely on the standalone benchmark scores and architectural details captured in the database.

For the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, the database contains a full set of ten benchmark results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records a score of 2348. Geekbench OpenCL returns 92426, while Geekbench Vulkan shows 48366. Passmark tests span several DirectX versions: DirectX 9 scores 228, DirectX 10 scores 85, DirectX 11 scores 167, and DirectX 12 scores 65. The Passmark G2D test yields 1030, the G3D test yields 17132, and the GPU Compute test yields 8987. The average benchmark score for the RX 7600 XT is 17083, and the percentile versus all GPUs is 60.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries at all. Its average benchmark score is 0, and the percentile versus all GPUs is 50. This means the database holds no measured performance results for the LX ULTRA, so any direct numeric comparison is impossible on the basis of recorded scores. The closest the database comes to indirect context is the RX 7600 XT's nearest rivals list, which includes the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 with an average score of 17037 and a delta of 0.3 percent, the AMD Radeon HD 7970M with 17019 and 0.4 percent, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 with 17208 and -0.7 percent, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 with 16932 and 0.9 percent. Those deltas are all within one percent, indicating the RX 7600 XT sits in a tight performance cluster around the 17000 average score mark.

Because the LX ULTRA lacks recorded scores, the head-to-head section cannot report wins for either side. The data instead shows a contrast between a fully measured product and one with no captured performance results. The RX 7600 XT delivers a concrete set of numbers that place it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs, while the LX ULTRA sits at the 50th percentile by the database's classification, but with no supporting benchmark evidence. The implication is that the LX ULTRA is either too new to have accumulated results or has not been subjected to the same testing pipeline.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two GPUs is substantial. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation, also referred to as the RX 7000 series. The process node is 6 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The transistor count is recorded as 13,300 million, and the die size is 204 mm², giving a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip, with an architecture labeled TrueGPU and a generation designation of 7G100. It is also built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the database records the transistor count as unknown and the die size as unknown. Transistor density is likewise not listed. This creates a partial architectural comparison: both cards share the same process node and foundry, but the LX ULTRA's internal scale remains unspecified in the database.

The shading unit count differs sharply. The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The LX ULTRA's ray tracing core count is not recorded. The raw compute potential also diverges: the RX 7600 XT delivers 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.57 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, while the LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The FP16 ratio difference is notable because it indicates the LX ULTRA can process half-precision workloads at twice the rate of its FP32 throughput, whereas the RX 7600 XT processes both at the same rate.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The RX 7600 XT records 176.3 GPixel/s and 352.6 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA records 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA's higher texture and pixel rates align with its larger counts of TMUs and ROPs.

On the API side, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600 XT supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. That is a small but concrete feature difference in the graphics API stack.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 XT wins in the availability of measured data. The database records ten benchmark scores for it, covering 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark suites. Its average score of 17083 places it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals show that it trades positions with the GeForce RTX 3070, which sits 0.7 percent higher, and leads the GeForce GTX 690 by 0.3 percent, the Radeon HD 7970M by 0.4 percent, and the Tesla M4 by 0.9 percent. These numbers give the RX 7600 XT a defined performance profile that can be compared against other measured GPUs.

The LX ULTRA wins in raw specification counts. It has three times the shading units (6144 versus 2048), 1.5 times the TMUs (192 versus 128), and 1.5 times the ROPs (96 versus 64). Its FP32 throughput is 8.9 percent higher at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 22.57 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput is more than double at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 22.57 TFLOPS. Memory capacity and bandwidth also favor the LX ULTRA: 24 GB versus 16 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 8.9 percent higher and the texture rate is 8.9 percent higher.

The PCIe interface differs as well. The RX 7600 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. For workloads that saturate the link, the x16 connection offers more headroom, though the database does not include measurements that quantify this effect.

The display output configuration also separates the two. The RX 7600 XT offers one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports. The LX ULTRA offers four DisplayPort 1.4a ports and no HDMI. Users of modern HDMI displays would find the RX 7600 XT's HDMI 2.1a support relevant, while the LX ULTRA's four DisplayPort outputs suggest a multi-monitor setup with DisplayPort-centric connections.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture; the LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture. The RX 7600 XT has a codename (Hotpink Bonefish) and generation (Navi III), while the LX ULTRA has no codename and a generation of 7G100. Both use TSMC's 6 nm process, but the RX 7600 XT lists 13,300 million transistors and a 204 mm² die, while the LX ULTRA lists both as unknown.

Clock speeds are recorded only for the RX 7600 XT: base 1980 MHz, boost 2755 MHz, and game clock 2470 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock entries. The memory clock is identical for both at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Memory capacity favors the LX ULTRA at 24 GB GDDR6 over the RX 7600 XT's 16 GB GDDR6. The bus width is 192 bits versus 128 bits, and bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s.

The compute units differ. The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count recorded. FP32 is 22.57 TFLOPS for the RX 7600 XT and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX ULTRA. FP16 is 22.57 TFLOPS for the RX 7600 XT (1:1 ratio) and 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX ULTRA (2:1 ratio).

Power and cooling specifications also diverge. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 450 W PSU. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and recommends a 550 W PSU. Both are dual-slot cards.

Physical dimensions favor the RX 7600 XT in length: 204 mm (8 inches) versus 268 mm (10.6 inches). The height is similar at 115 mm (4.5 inches) versus 112 mm (4.4 inches). The LX ULTRA also records a width of 40 mm (1.6 inches), which the RX 7600 XT does not list.

The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the RX 7600 XT and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX ULTRA. Display outputs are one HDMI 2.1a plus three DisplayPort 2.1 for the RX 7600 XT, versus four DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX ULTRA.

API support is nearly identical: both have DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, with Vulkan 1.4 on the RX 7600 XT and Vulkan 1.3 on the LX ULTRA.

The release dates differ by roughly two years. The RX 7600 XT was released on 2024-01-23, and the LX ULTRA on 2026-03-16. The RX 7600 XT has a recorded launch MSRP of 329 USD, while the LX ULTRA has no launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of 0, since no benchmark entries are recorded for it.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 and FP16 throughput figures?

A: The RX 7600 XT delivers 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.57 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Q: Which GPU uses more power?

A: The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W and recommends a 550 W PSU. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W and recommends a 450 W PSU.

Q: What process node do both GPUs use?

A: Both the RX 7600 XT and the LX ULTRA are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RX 7600 XT in the database?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (average score 17037, delta 0.3 percent), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 0.4 percent), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (17208, -0.7 percent), and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932, 0.9 percent).

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split between these two products. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a fully measured part with ten benchmark scores, an average score of 17083, and a 60th percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals confirm that it performs within one percent of the GeForce RTX 3070, the GeForce GTX 690, the Radeon HD 7970M, and the Tesla M4. This makes it a known quantity in the database.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is defined entirely by its specifications. It has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile of 50 is a database classification, not a measured result. The specifications indicate a design with substantially higher raw resources: 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 24 GB of memory, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The FP16 figure of 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio suggests a strong half-precision compute profile.

The verdict from the data is straightforward. The RX 7600 XT is the only card with demonstrated performance evidence, so any decision based on measured results must favor it. The LX ULTRA presents a compelling specification sheet, but the absence of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be verified against the RX 7600 XT or any other GPU in the database. The two cards also differ in practical areas: the RX 7600 XT is shorter, uses less power, requires a smaller PSU, and offers HDMI 2.1a plus DisplayPort 2.1. The LX ULTRA is longer, consumes more power, requires a 16-pin connector, and offers only DisplayPort 1.4a output. The RX 7600 XT has a launch MSRP of 329 USD, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded launch MSRP.

For a buyer or analyst relying on the database, the RX 7600 XT is the only card with measurable performance data, and that data places it at the 60th percentile with strong competition around the 17000 average score mark. The LX ULTRA's 50th percentile classification and empty benchmark table leave its performance as an open question. The specifications suggest it was designed to outclass the RX 7600 XT on paper, but the database cannot confirm any advantage without recorded scores. The data implies that the LX ULTRA is a higher-spec, higher-power, larger card whose actual performance remains unmeasured, while the RX 7600 XT is a compact, efficient, fully validated product.