AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison data between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is sparse. The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards, and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores of its own. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and its percentile rank among all GPUs sits at 50.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, by contrast, has a full set of measured results. Its average benchmark score is 17083, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it records 2348 points. Geekbench OpenCL returns 92426, while Geekbench Vulkan shows 48366. Passmark results include 17132 in G3D, 8987 in GPU Compute, 228 in DirectX 9, 167 in DirectX 11, 85 in DirectX 10, and 65 in DirectX 12. The 2D score is 1030.

Without recorded scores for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, the database cannot produce a direct numerical comparison between the two products. The RX 7600 XT's nearest rivals, however, provide context for its positioning. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 averages 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 XT. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 averages 17037, landing 0.3% below. The AMD Radeon HD 7970M averages 17019, 0.4% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 averages 16932, 0.9% lower. These margins are tight, indicating the RX 7600 XT sits in a crowded performance band where the spread among its closest competitors is under one percent.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process. It belongs to the RDNA 3.0 architecture, carries the codename Hotpink Bonefish, and is part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Its predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip, also fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. Its architecture is listed as TrueGPU, and it belongs to the 7G100 generation. The database records its transistor count, die size, and transistor density as unknown. No predecessor or successor is listed for the LX 7G100.

Clock behavior differs markedly. The RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a boost clock of 2755 MHz, and a game clock of 2470 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks. Both cards run their memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, but the memory configuration diverges. The RX 7600 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s, which is 144.0 GB/s higher.

Compute resources also differ. The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing core count is listed. The LX 7G100 therefore has three times the shading units, 1.5 times the TMUs, and 1.5 times the ROPs. Pixel rate for the RX 7600 XT is 176.3 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX 7G100. Texture rate is 352.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 22.57 TFLOPS for the RX 7600 XT and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100, a gap of 2.01 TFLOPS. In FP16, the RX 7600 XT maintains a 1:1 ratio at 22.57 TFLOPS, while the LX 7G100 doubles to 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600 XT supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Its 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6 delivers 432.0 GB/s, compared to 288.0 GB/s on the RX 7600 XT's 128-bit bus with 16 GB.

Q: What is the performance difference in FP32 compute?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT reaches 22.57 TFLOPS, a difference of 2.01 TFLOPS in favor of the LX 7G100.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have ray tracing cores?

A: The database lists no ray tracing core count for the LX 7G100. The RX 7600 XT has 32 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100's architecture is recorded as TrueGPU, but no RT core specification is provided.

Q: Which card has a higher recorded average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. Its average benchmark score is 17083. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no individual benchmark results recorded.

Q: Do both cards use the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 are fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process.

Q: What is the memory clock for both cards?

A: Both cards run their GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The difference is in bus width and total bandwidth, not memory clock.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) | 7G100 |

| Base clock | 1980 MHz | Not recorded |

| Boost clock | 2755 MHz | Not recorded |

| Game clock | 2470 MHz | Not recorded |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 32 | Not recorded |

| Pixel rate | 176.3 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 352.6 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 performance | 22.57 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 190 W | 225 W |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 204 mm (8 inches) | 294 mm (11.6 inches) |

| Height | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |

| Width | Not recorded | 49 mm (1.9 inches) |

| Release date | 2024-01-23 | 2026-06-17 |

| Launch MSRP | 329 USD | Not recorded |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 204 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 65.2M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Predecessor | Navi II | Not recorded |

| Successor | Navi IV | Not recorded |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT wins in areas where the database has actual measured data. It holds a recorded average benchmark score of 17083 against a score of 0 for the LX 7G100, and it sits in the 60th percentile of all GPUs versus the 50th percentile for the LX 7G100. It also carries a known ray tracing core count of 32, while the LX 7G100 has none listed. The RX 7600 XT uses a wider set of display outputs, including 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, and supports Vulkan 1.4. It draws less power at 190 W versus 225 W, and requires a smaller suggested PSU at 450 W versus 550 W. Its physical footprint is much smaller at 204 mm in length versus 294 mm, and it has a documented 16 GB memory capacity.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins on raw specification counts. Its 6144 shading units triple the RX 7600 XT's 2048. Its 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs exceed the RX 7600 XT's 128 and 64 respectively. FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS tops 22.57 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS more than doubles the RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s on a 192-bit bus beats 288.0 GB/s on a 128-bit bus. Pixel rate and texture rate are also higher at 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s versus 176.3 GPixel/s and 352.6 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface compared to the RX 7600 XT's PCIe 4.0 x8.

The database records no benchmark results for the LX 7G100, so its specification advantages remain theoretical in terms of real-world performance. The RX 7600 XT is the only one of the two with verified measurements across multiple test suites, including 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark. The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the LX 7G100 presents a stronger specification sheet on paper, while the RX 7600 XT presents the only actual performance data available.