AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database currently contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The head-to-head table is empty, and neither card has a recorded win count in direct comparisons. This means any performance relationship must be derived from the available standalone measurements and specification data.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a substantial set of benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score sits at 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The strongest single result for this card is the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051, followed by a Geekbench Vulkan score of 34401. In the Passmark suite, the card records a G3D score of 16634, a G2D score of 984, a GPU compute score of 8790, and DirectX 9/10/11/12 scores of 226, 84, 172, and 58 respectively. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 2310.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, its percentile is 50, and its nearest rivals list is empty. This absence of measured data makes direct numerical comparison impossible for any workload.

However, the nearest rivals for the RX 7600 provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 15199, which is 0.2% higher than the RX 7600. The AMD Radeon 680M averages 15270, which is 0.7% higher. On the other side, the AMD Radeon Pro 560X averages 15082, which is 0.6% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti averages 15063, which is 0.7% lower. These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating the RX 7600 sits in a tightly clustered performance band.

For the LX ULTRA, the absence of scores means the database cannot confirm its relative performance against any rival. Its 50th percentile ranking appears to be a default placeholder rather than a measured result. Any claims about its benchmark behavior would be unsupported by the current data.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the LX ULTRA, with an average benchmark score of 0. All ten benchmark tests recorded for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 have no counterpart for the LX ULTRA.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The RX 7600 averages 15171. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM by 0.2% (15199) and the AMD Radeon 680M by 0.7% (15270). It leads the AMD Radeon Pro 560X by 0.6% (15082) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 0.7% (15063).

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two cards?

A: The RX 7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. Both run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Which card has higher raw compute throughput as listed in the database?

A: The LX ULTRA lists FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS, which is higher than the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS. In FP16, the LX ULTRA lists 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the RX 7600 lists 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: What are the release dates recorded for these cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 was released on 2023-05-24. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a recorded release date of 2026-03-16.

Q: Do both cards support the same API feature levels?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. They differ in Vulkan support: the RX 7600 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share a process node and foundry. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Beyond that, the architectures diverge completely.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. Its codename is Hotpink Bonefish, and it belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip, built on the TrueGPU architecture, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, with no transistor density figure.

The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The shading unit count difference is substantial: the LX ULTRA has three times the shading units of the RX 7600.

Pixel and texture rates reflect these differences. The RX 7600 records a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA records a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA leads in both, by 13% in pixel rate and by 13% in texture rate.

Clock specifications differ sharply. The RX 7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2655 MHz, and a game clock of 2250 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock listed in the database. This absence of clock data makes frequency comparisons impossible, though the higher texture and pixel rates for the LX ULTRA suggest higher effective throughput per clock or a larger execution footprint.

The bus interface also differs. The RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This gives the LX ULTRA twice the available bus lanes for host communication, which can matter for data transfer-bound workloads.

Power delivery differs as well. The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Display outputs are another divergence. The RX 7600 offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The LX ULTRA offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7600 supports the newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard, while the LX ULTRA uses the older DisplayPort 1.4a, though with four ports instead of three.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but incomplete picture. The RX 7600 has a full set of measured benchmarks, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 15171 sits within one percentage point of four nearest rivals, all of which are clustered between 15063 and 15270. This confirms the RX 7600 as a mid-pack performer that trades places with its closest competitors depending on the specific test.

The LX ULTRA has no benchmark data at all. Its average score of 0 and empty nearest rivals list mean the database cannot verify its actual performance. What the specification data does show is a card with significantly higher listed resources: 6144 shading units versus 2048, 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 21.75 TFLOPS. These figures suggest the LX ULTRA should outperform the RX 7600 in compute-heavy workloads, provided the architecture scales accordingly.

However, specification superiority does not guarantee benchmark superiority. The RX 7600 has a validated track record in the database. The LX ULTRA has none. The RX 7600 also carries a launch MSRP of 269 USD, while the LX ULTRA has no launch MSRP recorded.

For a buyer prioritizing proven, measured performance, the RX 7600 is the only card with data to support its claims. For a buyer prioritizing raw listed specifications, the LX ULTRA appears stronger on paper, but that strength is unverified by any benchmark result. The recorded data favors the RX 7600 for confidence and the LX ULTRA for theoretical headroom.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards as recorded in the database:

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) | 7G100 |

| Codename | Hotpink Bonefish | None |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 204 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 65.2M / mm² | None |

| Base clock | 1720 MHz | None |

| Boost clock | 2655 MHz | None |

| Game clock | 2250 MHz | None |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 32 | None |

| Pixel rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 21.75 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 165 W | 225 W |

| Power connector | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 204 mm (8 inches) | 268 mm (10.6 inches) |

| Height | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | None | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

| Release date | 2023-05-24 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 269 USD | None |

| Average benchmark score | 15171 | 0 |

| Percentile | 57 | 50 |

| Nearest rivals | 4 entries | None |

Both cards share the 6 nm TSMC process, GDDR6 memory type, 2250 MHz memory clock with 18 Gbps effective, Dual-slot width, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, OpenGL 4.6 support, and Active production status.