AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The RX 7600 has a full set of recorded scores, while the LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries at all. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible. The RX 7600 holds an average benchmark score of 15171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The LX 7G100 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, meaning no valid performance data has been captured for it.

The RX 7600's recorded results show a wide spread across API tests. Its strongest showing is in PassMark G3D with a score of 16634, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 88051. PassMark DirectX 9 delivers 226, DirectX 11 reaches 172, and DirectX 10 comes in at 84. The DirectX 12 score drops to 58. PassMark G2D records 984, and GPU compute scores 8790. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 2310, while Geekbench Vulkan produces 34401. These figures establish the RX 7600 as a mid-tier performer relative to all tracked GPUs.

For the LX 7G100, the lack of any benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm its performance in any test. Its 50th percentile ranking appears to be a placeholder rather than a measured result. The RX 7600's nearest rivals provide useful context for its standing. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 15199, which is 0.2% higher than the RX 7600. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X averages 15082, 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon 680M averages 15270, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti averages 15063, 0.7% lower. These deltas place the RX 7600 in a tight cluster with its immediate competition.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, with the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation within the Radeon RX 7000 series. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip, also fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, under what the database lists as the TrueGPU architecture. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, with no transistor density figure available. The LX 7G100 has no codename and no generation designation beyond the 7G100 series label.

Shading unit counts differ substantially. The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The database does not list any ray tracing cores for the LX 7G100, leaving its ray tracing capability unspecified.

Clock behavior diverges as well. The RX 7600 lists a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2655 MHz, and a game clock of 2250 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks. Both cards run their memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Compute throughput differs in both scale and precision handling. The RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS for FP32 and the same 21.75 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, indicating a different precision architecture. Pixel rates are 169.9 GPixel/s for the RX 7600 versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX 7G100. Texture rates are 339.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

API support shows minor differences. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX 7G100's older Vulkan version may affect compatibility with newer Vulkan-based applications, but the database does not quantify any performance impact.

The Verdict

The data supports no definitive performance verdict between these two cards because the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmarks. The RX 7600 has extensive measurements, placing it at the 57th percentile overall. The LX 7G100 sits at the 50th percentile with zero average score, which indicates an absence of data rather than a measured result.

For users selecting purely on confirmed performance, the RX 7600 is the only card with verified scores. Its closest rivals, the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M, sit within 0.7% of its average score, so the RX 7600 occupies a well-defined performance tier. The LX 7G100's larger memory capacity, wider bus, and higher compute figures suggest it may deliver more throughput, but without benchmark results these remain theoretical specifications.

The RX 7600's 57th percentile ranking means it outperforms a clear majority of all GPUs in the database. The LX 7G100's 50th percentile is the median position, but with no supporting scores it cannot be interpreted as a measured result. The verdict from the available data is straightforward: the RX 7600 has proven performance, while the LX 7G100 has unverified claims.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | Unknown |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | Not listed |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| FP32 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 165 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 204 mm (8 inches) | 294 mm (11.6 inches) |

| Height | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |

| Width | Not listed | 49 mm (1.9 inches) |

| Release Date | 2023-05-24 | 2026-06-17 |

| Launch MSRP | 269 USD | Not listed |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 432.0 GB/s bandwidth across a 192 bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 288.0 GB/s across a 128 bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6.

Q: How do the FP32 compute figures compare?

A: The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is higher than the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 also provides 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 7600 offers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 1:1 ratio.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The LX 7G100 has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, compared to the RX 7600's 169.9 GPixel/s. The LX 7G100 also has a higher texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s.

Q: What benchmark scores exist for the LX 7G100?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX 7G100. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded. The RX 7600, by contrast, has ten benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and PassMark tests.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The RX 7600 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. Both use a single 8-pin power connector.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 wins in confirmed performance data. Its average benchmark score of 15171 places it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with verified results across multiple API tests. Its nearest rivals are within 0.7% of its average score, which shows it competes directly with the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M. The RX 7600 also holds advantages in physical footprint, with a length of 204 mm versus 294 mm for the LX 7G100, making it suitable for smaller cases.

The LX 7G100 wins on paper specifications. Its 12 GB memory capacity exceeds the RX 7600's 8 GB, and its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is 50% higher. Its 6144 shading units triple the RX 7600's 2048, and its 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs exceed the RX 7600's 128 and 64 respectively. The LX 7G100 also has higher pixel and texture rates and a wider PCIe 4.0 x16 interface versus the RX 7600's PCIe 4.0 x8.

The LX 7G100's FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio suggests it may handle mixed-precision workloads more efficiently than the RX 7600's 1:1 FP16 implementation. Its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs offer more display connections than the RX 7600's single HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, though the RX 7600 supports the newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard. The LX 7G100's later release date of 2026-06-17 also indicates a more recent design cycle.

For gaming and general use, the RX 7600 has the only measured performance in the database. Its 57th percentile ranking confirms it outperforms most tracked GPUs. For compute-heavy workloads where raw specifications matter more than verified results, the LX 7G100's larger memory, wider bus, and higher throughput figures present a compelling theoretical case. The absence of any benchmark scores for the LX 7G100 means its actual performance remains unconfirmed, and the database cannot verify whether its specifications translate into real-world wins.