AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs Intel Arc Graphics 24EU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM and Intel Arc Graphics 24EU occupy entirely different segments of the graphics market, and the recorded data reflects that gap clearly. The Radeon RX 7400 OEM is a discrete add-in board from the Radeon RX 7000 series, built around the Navi 33 chip. The Arc Graphics 24EU is an integrated graphics processor embedded in the Arrow Lake-S silicon. Their benchmark results, architectural resources, and intended roles diverge sharply, and the database entries provide a detailed picture of each.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single benchmark score for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 733 points. No comparable benchmark score is listed for the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM, so a direct numeric comparison between these two specific parts is not possible from the recorded data. However, the Arc Graphics 24EU percentile ranking places it at 3rd percentile among all GPUs, which means the vast majority of other graphics processors outperform it. Its average benchmark score is 733, and it sits at parity with the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU, both of which also score 733. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails by 1.4 percent with a score of 723, while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M leads by 2.4 percent with 751 points.

The Radeon RX 7400 OEM has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed in the database. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which places it at the median of the performance distribution, but this figure is not tied to any recorded workload result. Because the head-to-head benchmark table is empty and neither part has a shared test, the numerical comparison stops here. The data indicates that the Arc Graphics 24EU is a low-tier performer even among integrated solutions, while the Radeon RX 7400 OEM’s median percentile suggests a much higher standing, but the absence of a common benchmark prevents a precise percentage difference.

The lack of overlapping tests is itself a meaningful finding. The Arc Graphics 24EU has a confirmed 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score, while the Radeon RX 7400 OEM has no recorded score in any test. Any statement about relative performance must therefore rely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing processes and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with a 6 nm process from TSMC. It has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The chip is codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and it belongs to the Navi III generation within the Radeon RX 7000 series.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process, also from TSMC. Its chip is Arrow Lake-S, and it carries 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 73.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The integrated part belongs to the Arc Graphics generation for Arrow Lake.

The Radeon RX 7400 OEM has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz. Its memory runs at 1350 MHz, which translates to 10.8 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a substantially higher boost clock of 2000 MHz. However, the Intel part uses system shared memory, so its memory clock, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system dependent or shared.

Shading resources show a massive disparity. The Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also has 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Graphics 24EU has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The pixel rate for the Radeon is 70.40 GPixel/s versus 12.00 GPixel/s for the Arc. Texture rate measures 123.2 GTexel/s versus 24.00 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is 7.885 TFLOPS for the Radeon in both FP32 and FP16 (with a 1:1 ratio), while the Arc delivers 768.0 GFLOPS in FP32 and 1.536 TFLOPS in FP16 (with a 2:1 ratio).

Thermal and power characteristics differ as well. The Radeon RX 7400 OEM has a TDP of 55 W, is single-slot, and requires one 6-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 250 W. The Arc Graphics 24EU has a TDP of 65 W, no power connectors, and is labeled as an IGP. The Radeon uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Arc uses a Ring Bus.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the Radeon has one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connectors, while the Arc’s outputs are motherboard dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon RX 7400 OEM wins decisively on raw compute resources. It has 9.3 times the shading units of the Arc Graphics 24EU, 9.3 times the TMUs, and 10.7 times the ROPs. Its FP32 throughput of 7.885 TFLOPS is about 10.3 times the Arc’s 768.0 GFLOPS. Pixel fill rate is roughly 5.9 times higher, and texture fill rate is about 5.1 times higher. The Radeon also has dedicated ray tracing hardware with 28 RT cores, which the Arc lacks entirely.

The Radeon RX 7400 OEM also wins on memory configuration. It has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Graphics 24EU relies on system shared memory, meaning its bandwidth depends entirely on the host platform. A discrete GPU with dedicated memory avoids contention with the CPU and system processes, which is a structural advantage.

The Arc Graphics 24EU wins on process technology. Its 3 nm node is smaller than the 6 nm node used by the Radeon, and its transistor density is higher at 73.3 million per square millimeter versus 65.2 million. It also has a higher boost clock at 2000 MHz versus 1100 MHz, although the Radeon’s base clock is slightly higher at 330 MHz versus 300 MHz. The Arc is an integrated solution, so it requires no separate card, no power connector, and no additional slot. It also consumes slightly more TDP at 65 W versus 55 W, but this is within a similar range.

The Arc Graphics 24EU also wins on release timing. The database records its release date as 2024-10-23, while the Radeon RX 7400 OEM is dated 2025-08-07. The Arc is the older part by roughly nine months.

In terms of benchmark percentile, the Radeon RX 7400 OEM sits at the 50th percentile, while the Arc Graphics 24EU sits at the 3rd percentile. This indicates that the Radeon occupies the middle of the performance distribution, whereas the Arc is near the bottom. The Arc’s nearest rivals are all low-end parts, including other Intel Arc integrated variants and old mobile GPUs. The Radeon has no listed rivals, which suggests it does not cluster near any other recorded part.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 1792 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has 192 shading units. That is a 9.3 times difference.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU have ray tracing cores?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 28 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses system shared memory, with bus width and bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: How do their benchmark percentiles compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is at the 3rd percentile.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses a 3 nm process, also from TSMC.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a boost clock of 2000 MHz, while the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has a boost clock of 1100 MHz.

Q: What API support do both GPUs share?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field.

Process Node: AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses 6 nm. Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses 3 nm.

Transistors: AMD has 13,300 million. Intel has 17,800 million.

Die Size: AMD measures 204 mm². Intel measures 243 mm².

Transistor Density: AMD has 65.2M per mm². Intel has 73.3M per mm².

Base Clock: AMD runs at 330 MHz. Intel runs at 300 MHz.

Boost Clock: AMD boosts to 1100 MHz. Intel boosts to 2000 MHz.

Memory Size: AMD has 8 GB GDDR6. Intel uses system shared memory.

Memory Bus Width: AMD has 128 bit. Intel is system shared.

Memory Bandwidth: AMD has 172.8 GB/s. Intel is system dependent.

Shading Units: AMD has 1792. Intel has 192.

TMUs: AMD has 112. Intel has 12.

ROPs: AMD has 64. Intel has 6.

Ray Tracing Cores: AMD has 28. Intel has none listed.

Pixel Rate: AMD has 70.40 GPixel/s. Intel has 12.00 GPixel/s.

Texture Rate: AMD has 123.2 GTexel/s. Intel has 24.00 GTexel/s.

FP32 Performance: AMD has 7.885 TFLOPS. Intel has 768.0 GFLOPS.

FP16 Performance: AMD has 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1). Intel has 1.536 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: AMD has 55 W. Intel has 65 W.

Slot Width: AMD is single-slot. Intel is IGP.

Power Connectors: AMD has one 6-pin. Intel has none.

Suggested PSU: AMD lists 250 W. Intel lists none.

Bus Interface: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Intel uses Ring Bus.

Display Outputs: AMD has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Intel is motherboard dependent.

Dimensions: AMD is 167 mm or 6.6 inches long. Intel has no listed dimensions.

Release Date: AMD is 2025-08-07. Intel is 2024-10-23.

Production Status: AMD has no listed status. Intel is listed as active.

Predecessor: AMD lists Navi II. Intel lists HD Graphics.

Successor: AMD lists Navi IV. Intel lists none.

The data confirms two products aimed at completely different use cases. The Radeon RX 7400 OEM provides dedicated graphics resources, discrete memory, and ray tracing capability. The Arc Graphics 24EU is a low-power integrated solution that shares system resources and targets basic display and light compute workloads. Their architectural philosophies, from transistor budgets to clock strategies, reflect those divergent roles.