AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM vs Intel Arc 130V Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM versus the Intel Arc 130V Mobile. Both entries have empty benchmark arrays, zero average benchmark scores, and no nearest rival data. This means a numerical comparison of performance across specific workloads cannot be established from the available measurements.

What can be compared directly are the theoretical throughput limits derived from each GPU's architecture. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc 130V Mobile reaches 3.315 TFLOPS. This places the AMD part at roughly 2.38 times the raw single-precision throughput of the Intel part. In FP16 workloads, the AMD GPU again outputs 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), whereas the Intel Arc 130V Mobile reaches 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), a narrower gap of about 1.19 times.

Pixel throughput follows a similar pattern. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM records 70.40 GPixel/s, and the Intel Arc 130V Mobile records 51.80 GPixel/s. The AMD part is ahead by about 36 percent. Texture fill rates show a smaller separation: 123.2 GTexel/s for the AMD GPU versus 103.6 GTexel/s for the Intel part, a margin of roughly 19 percent.

Memory bandwidth is a decisive differentiator. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128 bit bus, yielding 172.8 GB/s. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. No fixed bandwidth figure exists for the Intel part, so any comparison must remain qualitative: the AMD GPU has a dedicated, fixed-bandwidth memory subsystem, while the Intel part's performance scales with the host platform's memory configuration.

Clock behavior also differs meaningfully. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 1850 MHz. The Intel part boosts to a much higher frequency, but its lower shader count, TMU count, and ROP count limit its overall throughput despite the clock advantage.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM wins decisively in raw compute density and dedicated memory throughput. Its FP32 figure of 7.885 TFLOPS is more than double the Intel part's 3.315 TFLOPS, which positions it for workloads that rely on sustained single-precision arithmetic. The dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 pool with 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth removes dependency on system memory channels, which is an advantage for texture-heavy rendering and larger framebuffer operations.

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile wins on power efficiency per unit of compute. Its TDP is 37 W, versus 55 W for the AMD GPU. Relative to its FP32 output of 3.315 TFLOPS, the Intel part delivers about 0.0896 TFLOPS per watt, while the AMD GPU delivers roughly 0.143 TFLOPS per watt. That means the AMD part is more efficient per watt on paper, but the Intel part consumes 18 W less total power, making it suited to thermally constrained or battery-powered systems.

The Intel part also benefits from a more advanced process node. It is built on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the AMD GPU uses a 6 nm TSMC process. This contributes to the Intel part's higher boost clock of 1850 MHz and its lower 37 W power envelope. The AMD GPU uses a larger 204 mm² die with 13,300 million transistors, while the Intel die is 172 mm² with transistor count listed as unknown.

In FP16 workloads, the Intel Arc 130V Mobile closes much of the gap. Its 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1) is about 84 percent of the AMD part's 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1). Applications that use packed FP16 math will see the Intel part perform closer to parity than in FP32 tasks.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is a discrete, single-slot card with a 1x 6-pin power connector and a suggested 250 W PSU. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with no power connector and no PSU recommendation. This makes the Intel part viable for compact laptops and portable devices, while the AMD part requires a PCIe 4.0 x8 slot and external power delivery.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and the Radeon RX 7000 series. Its predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV. The GPU is fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with a die size of 204 mm² and 13,300 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile uses Xe2-LPG architecture with the Lunar Lake chip. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation, and its predecessor is HD Graphics-M. The process node is 3 nm at TSMC, and the die size is 172 mm². Transistor count and transistor density are not recorded.

Shader resources differ substantially. The AMD GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, 28 ROPs, and 7 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has exactly double the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, and four times the ray tracing cores.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective). The Intel Arc 130V Mobile uses system shared memory, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent or shared.

The AMD GPU is a discrete card with a 167 mm length, single-slot width, and one 6-pin power connector. The Intel part is an IGP with no slot width, no dimensions, and no power connectors. The AMD GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Intel part is IGP, meaning it connects directly to the host processor without a discrete PCIe link.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ: the AMD card has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel part's outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM released on 2025-08-07, and the Intel Arc 130V Mobile released on 2024-09-23. The Intel part is marked as active in production status, while the AMD part has no production status recorded.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs with opposite design goals. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM is a discrete, low-power desktop card with dedicated memory and roughly 2.38 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel Arc 130V Mobile. It suits systems with a PCIe 4.0 x8 slot, a 6-pin power connector, and a 250 W PSU. Its 8 GB GDDR6 with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth provides a consistent memory performance floor that system-shared memory cannot guarantee.

The Intel Arc 130V Mobile is an integrated processor for portable devices. It consumes 37 W, has no external power requirement, and relies on system memory. Its FP16 throughput of 6.630 TFLOPS is close to the AMD part's 7.885 TFLOPS, and its 1850 MHz boost clock is significantly higher. However, its FP32 output, pixel rate, and texture rate all trail the AMD GPU by margins of roughly 19 to 138 percent.

A user with a desktop chassis and power delivery headroom should select the AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM. The data shows it leads in every fixed throughput metric recorded except boost clock. A user with a thin-and-light mobile system should select the Intel Arc 130V Mobile, as its IGP form factor and 37 W TDP fit platforms where a discrete card cannot be installed.

Both GPUs sit at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs in the database, and both have zero average benchmark scores. Neither part can be ranked against specific rivals from the recorded data. The decision rests on platform compatibility and workload type: FP32-heavy tasks favor AMD, power-constrained mobile tasks favor Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM delivers 7.885 TFLOPS, which is more than double the Intel Arc 130V Mobile's 3.315 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in FP16 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM achieves 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the Intel Arc 130V Mobile achieves 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), a gap of about 19 percent.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has a 55 W TDP, uses a single 6-pin power connector, and suggests a 250 W PSU. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile has a 37 W TDP, no power connector, and no PSU recommendation.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc 130V Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc 130V Mobile has 7.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7400 OEM | Intel Arc 130V Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-LPG |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 172 mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1850 MHz |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 896 |

| TMUs | 112 | 56 |

| ROPs | 64 | 28 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 7 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 51.80 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 103.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 3.315 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | System Dependent |

| TDP | 55 W | 37 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | None |

| Release Date | 2025-08-07 | 2024-09-23 |

| Production Status | None recorded | Active |

| Predecessor | Navi II | HD Graphics-M |

| Successor | Navi IV | None |