AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs Intel Arc A530M Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and Intel Arc A530M occupy different corners of the GPU market, and the benchmark data reflects a clear hierarchy between them. The RX 6750 GRE is a desktop-oriented card with a substantial lead in raw performance, while the Arc A530M is a mobile-focused part with a much lower power envelope. This analysis compares the two directly using the available benchmark results, specifications, and competitive positioning.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark between the two GPUs is Geekbench Vulkan, and the results are decisively in favor of the AMD card. The RX 6750 GRE scores 108,994 points, while the Arc A530M manages 43,492 points. That translates to a delta of 150.6% — meaning the AMD card is roughly two and a half times faster in this specific test. This is not a marginal victory; it is a generational gap in compute performance that will show up in every GPU-bound workload.

Looking at broader averages, the RX 6750 GRE has an average benchmark score of 55,698 across all tests, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The Arc A530M averages 46,614 points, which lands it in the 85th percentile. While the percentile difference is small — only two points — the raw score gap is nearly 20%. The AMD card sits just 0.1% below the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in its nearest rival group, showing it is competitive with much higher-tier parts. The Arc A530M, by contrast, is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (0% delta) and trails the AMD Radeon RX 6550M by 0.2%, placing it in the same performance class as older mid-range mobile GPUs.

The Vulkan result is the only head-to-head test available, and the AMD card wins it outright. There is no benchmark where the Intel part comes out ahead. This is a one-sided comparison, and the data does not suggest any scenario where the Arc A530M overtakes the RX 6750 GRE in compute or graphics throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has an average benchmark score of 55,698, compared to 46,614 for the Intel Arc A530M. That is a difference of roughly 9,084 points, or about 19.5% in favor of the AMD card.

Q: How do the two compare in Geekbench Vulkan performance?

A: The RX 6750 GRE scores 108,994 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the Arc A530M scores 43,492. The AMD card leads by 150.6%, making it significantly faster in this cross-platform graphics API test.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each GPU?

A: The RX 6750 GRE is in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, while the Arc A530M is in the 85th percentile. Despite the large performance gap, both cards are above the median, though the AMD part is positioned higher overall.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the Intel Arc A530M wins?

A: No. In the only shared benchmark (Geekbench Vulkan), the AMD card wins. The Intel part has zero wins in the head-to-head data.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 6750 GRE has a TDP of 250 W, while the Arc A530M has a TDP of 65 W. The Intel card uses substantially less power, but it also delivers far lower performance.

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The RX 6750 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, while the Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The AMD card also has higher memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE is built on RDNA 2.0, using the Navi 22 chip, and is fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. It packs 17,200 million transistors into a 335 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 51.3 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc A530M uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm node. It has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, for a density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The AMD chip is larger and denser, which contributes to its higher performance ceiling.

Core counts differ substantially. The RX 6750 GRE has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The Arc A530M has 1,536 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, with only 12 ray tracing cores. This is a 67% advantage in shading units for AMD, which directly translates into higher raw compute throughput. The FP32 performance is 13.21 TFLOPS for the AMD card versus 3.994 TFLOPS for the Intel part — a more than threefold difference.

Clock speeds also favor AMD. The RX 6750 GRE has a base clock of 2321 MHz and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2439 MHz. The Arc A530M runs at a 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost. Even accounting for the different power targets, the AMD card is running at nearly double the clock speed. Memory configurations reinforce the gap: the RX 6750 GRE uses 12 GB of GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective, while the Arc A530M uses 8 GB at 14 Gbps effective. The resulting bandwidth figures are 432.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so there are no API-level limitations on either side. The RX 6750 GRE is a dual-slot desktop card with PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc A530M is an integrated form factor (IGP) with PCIe 4.0 x8 and no dedicated power connectors. The AMD card requires a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power setup and a 600 W power supply, whereas the Intel part is designed for portable devices with no suggested PSU.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is the faster GPU by a wide margin. It wins the only head-to-head benchmark by 150.6%, has a higher average score (55,698 versus 46,614), and ranks higher in the overall percentile distribution (87th versus 85th). For anyone building a desktop system where performance is the priority, the RX 6750 GRE is the clear choice.

The Intel Arc A530M, however, should not be dismissed entirely. Its 65 W TDP makes it suitable for compact or mobile systems where power draw is a concern. It is an integrated part with no power connectors, meaning it can fit into designs where a discrete GPU with a 250 W TDP would be impossible. If the use case is a thin-and-light laptop or a low-power embedded system, the Arc A530M's efficiency is a practical advantage — but it comes at the cost of roughly one-third of the AMD card's FP32 throughput.

Buyers should choose the RX 6750 GRE if they need maximum performance in gaming, rendering, or compute workloads, and have the power budget and physical space for a dual-slot card. The Arc A530M is only appropriate when power constraints are non-negotiable and performance expectations are modest. In any direct comparison, the AMD card wins on every measurable performance metric.

Specification Differences

• Process Node: The RX 6750 GRE uses a 7 nm process, while the Arc A530M uses a 6 nm process.
• Transistors: AMD has 17,200 million transistors; Intel has 11,500 million.
• Die Size: AMD's die is 335 mm²; Intel's is 269 mm².
• Base Clock: 2321 MHz (AMD) versus 900 MHz (Intel).
• Boost Clock: 2581 MHz (AMD) versus 1300 MHz (Intel).
• Memory Size: 12 GB (AMD) versus 8 GB (Intel).
• Memory Bus Width: 192 bit (AMD) versus 128 bit (Intel).
• Memory Bandwidth: 432.0 GB/s (AMD) versus 224.0 GB/s (Intel).
• Shading Units: 2,560 (AMD) versus 1,536 (Intel).
• TMUs: 160 (AMD) versus 96 (Intel).
• ROPs: 64 (AMD) versus 48 (Intel).
• Ray Tracing Cores: 40 (AMD) versus 12 (Intel).
• FP32 Performance: 13.21 TFLOPS (AMD) versus 3.994 TFLOPS (Intel).
• TDP: 250 W (AMD) versus 65 W (Intel).
• Slot Width: Dual-slot (AMD) versus IGP (Intel).
• Power Connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin (AMD) versus none (Intel).
• Suggested PSU: 600 W (AMD) versus none (Intel).
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 (AMD) versus PCIe 4.0 x8 (Intel).
• Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a (AMD) versus Portable Device Dependent (Intel).
• Release Date: October 16, 2023 (AMD) versus July 31, 2023 (Intel).
• Launch MSRP: The RX 6750 GRE launched at 334 USD; the Arc A530M has no listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE wins in every performance category measured. It is faster in Vulkan compute, has a higher average benchmark score, and is positioned against much stronger rivals like the RTX 4080 (where it trails by only 2.7%) and the RTX 5080 (0.7% behind). This makes it the obvious pick for desktop gaming, 3D rendering, or any workload that demands high throughput. The 12 GB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth also give it headroom for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The Intel Arc A530M wins only in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 65 W TDP is less than a third of the AMD card's 250 W, and its IGP form factor means it can be integrated into devices where a discrete card would not fit. It has no power connectors and no suggested PSU requirement, making it a drop-in solution for mobile or compact systems. In terms of raw performance, it is competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M and RX 6550M, but those are older or lower-tier mobile parts. For users who prioritize battery life and portability over frame rates, the Arc A530M is the only sensible option — but that is a narrow use case. In every benchmark that matters, the RX 6750 GRE is the superior product.