GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6600M

CORE STATE Navi 23
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2416 MHz
TDP 100 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T1000

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1395 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,495
N/A
geekbench_metal
92,237
N/A
geekbench_opencl
67,765
37,704
geekbench_vulkan
73,740
34,874
passmark_directx_10
87
N/A
passmark_directx_11
136
N/A
passmark_directx_12
52
N/A
passmark_directx_9
184
N/A
passmark_g2d
728
N/A
passmark_g3d
13,929
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,646
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA T1000

For this graphics card showdown, AMD RX 6600 GPU shows its advantage clearly. If you're rendering at 1080p, AMD RX 6600 GPU steadily surpasses NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 graphics card by notable percentages. This benchmark margin grows notably wider at increased resolutions. This video card handles resource-hungry scenarios with capability. Its technical advantages are obvious.

For RT, AMD RX 6600 GPU pulls even more forward of NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 graphics card. Its specialized units process heavy shadow calculations considerably more smoothly. Users demanding premium fidelity would definitely favor AMD RX 6600 GPU. This ray tracing advantage is significant. Current titles progressively leverage ray tracing features.

Gaming performance over different resolutions steadily support AMD RX 6600 GPU. Whether it's esports titles to blockbuster games, AMD RX 6600 GPU maintains its lead. This benchmark dependability throughout various titles proves core technical superiority. Gamers should rely on capable results regardless of scenario. The adaptability is remarkable.

NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 graphics card is not overlooked fully, yet its gaming shortfall relative to AMD RX 6600 GPU is tough to dismiss. For value-focused consumers, NVIDIA NVIDIA T1000 graphics card might nonetheless make sense if its reduced MSRP makes up for its lesser performance. Nevertheless, when raw graphics power, AMD RX 6600 GPU is the obvious choice. The verdict is straightforward. Speed seekers should gravitate toward AMD RX 6600 GPU.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6600M
T1000
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
896 -50.0%
Shaders
1,792
896 -50.0%
TMUs
112
56 -50.0%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
28
SM Count
14
Clocks
Base Clock
2068 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
2416 MHz
1395 MHz
Game Clock
2177 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
224.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
154.6 GPixel/s
44.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
270.6 GTexel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.659 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
541.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
78.12 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
17.32 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.000 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
Power
TDP
100 W
50 W
TDP (W)
100
50 -50.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 23
TU117
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
7 nm
12 nm
Transistors
11,060 million
4,700 million
Die Size
237 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
46.7M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
156 mm 6.1 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View Radeon RX 6600M Details View T1000 Details