AMD Radeon RX 6450M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

# FAQ

Q: What are the core architectural differences between the AMD Radeon RX 6450M and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The RX 6450M uses the Navi 24 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, while the LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture. Both are built on a 6 nm TSMC process, but the RX 6450M has 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, whereas the LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare between these two GPUs?

A: The RX 6450M has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 128.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 Gbps effective memory speed. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 18 Gbps effective memory speed. The LX 7G100 delivers 3.375 times the memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the difference in compute capacity?

A: The RX 6450M has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, producing 3.779 TFLOPS FP32. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, producing 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The LX 7G100 delivers approximately 6.5 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The RX 6450M is rated at 50 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors. The LX 7G100 is rated at 225 W TDP, requires a dual-slot cooler, one 8-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: What are the interface and display output differences?

A: The RX 6450M uses PCIe 4.0 x4 and has portable device dependent display outputs. The LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX 7G100 also has recorded physical dimensions of 294 mm length, 120 mm height, and 49 mm width.

Q: Which API levels do these GPUs support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 6450M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

# Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 6450M and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 represent fundamentally different design approaches. The RX 6450M is based on the Navi 24 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, a compact design built for mobile integration. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture, a desktop-oriented design with substantially larger compute resources.

Both GPUs are fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process, but the similarities end there. The RX 6450M integrates 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 50.5 million per mm². The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database, though its larger physical footprint (294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width) indicates a much bigger board.

The compute configuration differs dramatically. The RX 6450M has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, representing an 8x increase in shading units, 4x in TMUs, and 3x in ROPs. The RX 6450M includes 12 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100's ray tracing core count is not recorded.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The RX 6450M uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, while the LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The effective memory speeds are 16 Gbps for the RX 6450M and 18 Gbps for the LX 7G100. This results in bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s respectively.

Power delivery and physical design also separate these products. The RX 6450M is an IGP with 50 W TDP and no power connectors, reflecting its mobile target. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot desktop card with 225 W TDP, one 8-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply. The bus interfaces differ as well, with PCIe 4.0 x4 for the RX 6450M and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX 7G100.

Clock behavior is recorded differently. The RX 6450M has a base clock of 2000 MHz, boost clock of 2460 MHz, and game clock of 2220 MHz. The LX 7G100 does not have base, boost, or game clocks recorded in the database, only its memory clock of 2250 MHz.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results for these two GPUs, nor any individual benchmark scores. However, the raw specification data provides clear performance indicators that can be compared directly.

The most significant gap appears in FP32 compute. The LX 7G100 produces 24.58 TFLOPS while the RX 6450M produces 3.779 TFLOPS. This means the LX 7G100 delivers approximately 6.5 times the single-precision floating-point throughput. For FP16, the LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 7.557 TFLOPS (2:1) for the RX 6450M, again a factor of roughly 6.5.

Pixel throughput shows a narrower but still substantial difference. The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s against 78.72 GPixel/s for the RX 6450M, a 2.44x advantage. Texture rate favors the LX 7G100 even more strongly: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 118.1 GTexel/s, a 3.25x advantage.

Memory bandwidth is where the LX 7G100 shows its largest relative lead. At 432.0 GB/s versus 128.0 GB/s, the LX 7G100 has 3.375 times the bandwidth. This is complemented by 12 GB of memory capacity against 4 GB, a 3x difference. The wider 192-bit bus compared to 64-bit also reduces memory latency pressure under heavy loads.

The RX 6450M does hold advantages in certain areas. Its boost clock of 2460 MHz and game clock of 2220 MHz are recorded, while the LX 7G100 has no clock data for comparison. The RX 6450M also supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer version than the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 equally.

Both GPUs are rated at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs in the database, though this percentile is based on an average benchmark score of zero for both, so it does not reflect a meaningful performance comparison.

# The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs designed for entirely different use cases. The AMD Radeon RX 6450M is a 50 W integrated processor targeting mobile devices where power efficiency and compact integration matter most. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a 225 W dual-slot desktop card requiring a 550 W power supply, built for maximum compute throughput.

For users constrained by mobile form factors, the RX 6450M is the only viable choice, as the LX 7G100's physical dimensions and power requirements preclude portable integration. The RX 6450M's 50 W TDP and IGP form factor align with thin-and-light laptops, while its lack of power connectors simplifies system integration.

For desktop users seeking raw performance, the LX 7G100 dominates on every recorded compute metric. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 12 GB memory capacity make it suitable for demanding workloads. The 6,144 shading units provide substantial parallel processing capability that the RX 6450M cannot match.

The release dates are notable: the RX 6450M was released in early 2023, while the LX 7G100 is dated mid-2026. Both remain in active production according to the database. The RX 6450M's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded predecessor.

Neither GPU has a recorded launch MSRP in the database, though the LX 7G100's suggested 550 W power supply indicates a higher system-level investment requirement. The RX 6450M's power connectors are listed as "None," further confirming its low-power integrated design.

# Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 6450M | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Chip | Navi 24 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 5,400 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 107 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 50.5M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | null |

| Game Clock | 2220 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 16 Gbps effective | 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Bus Width | 64 bit | 192 bit |

| Bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 768 | 6,144 |

| TMUs | 48 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 12 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 78.72 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 118.1 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.779 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.557 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 50 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | null | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | null | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | null | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2026-06-17 |

# Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6450M wins in scenarios prioritizing power efficiency and mobile integration. Its 50 W TDP allows deployment in portable devices without active cooling requirements or external power connections. The IGP form factor eliminates the need for a separate expansion slot. The newer Vulkan 1.4 API support provides access to the latest graphics features in that standard. Its recorded boost clock of 2460 MHz and game clock of 2220 MHz indicate a well-tuned mobile implementation relative to its power envelope.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins decisively in raw performance categories. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 output serves compute-heavy applications such as rendering, scientific simulation, and large-scale data processing. The 12 GB memory capacity accommodates larger datasets and textures than the RX 6450M's 4 GB. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and memory-intensive workloads. The 192-bit bus width provides better memory efficiency under sustained loads.

The LX 7G100's 6,144 shading units enable massive parallel processing across thousands of threads. Its 192 TMUs accelerate texture-heavy workloads, while 96 ROPs handle high-resolution rasterization. The 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate is more than triple the RX 6450M's 118.1 GTexel/s. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is 2.44 times higher.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the LX 7G100 provides four times the lane width of the RX 6450M's PCIe 4.0 x4, reducing data transfer bottlenecks for large workloads. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor configurations, while the RX 6450M's display outputs depend on the portable device.

The RX 6450M's advantage lies in its low-power mobile profile and the absence of power connector requirements. The LX 7G100's advantage lies in every measured performance metric, making it suitable for desktop systems with adequate power delivery and cooling. The choice between them depends entirely on the target platform and workload requirements.