AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 versus the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The head-to-head table is empty, and neither card has a win recorded in the comparison. This lack of direct testing means the only quantitative comparison available comes from the individual benchmark scores and the performance percentiles listed for each product.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has two recorded benchmark scores. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 154,366 points. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 175,422 points. These results combine to produce an average benchmark score of 164,894. That average places the card in the 97th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores at all, no average score, and its percentile sits at 50. The database lists zero benchmarks for the LX 7G100, so its performance cannot be compared directly through measured results.

The W7800 also has nearest rival data that provides context for its standing. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 shows an average score of 165,217, which is 0.2% above the W7800. The NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation averages 166,094, a 0.7% advantage. The AMD Radeon Pro W6900X averages 168,574, putting it 2.2% ahead. The NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB averages 162,504, which is 1.5% lower than the W7800. These deltas are small, indicating the W7800 sits in a tightly clustered performance band among its nearest rivals. The LX 7G100 has no nearest rivals listed, so no similar positioning data exists for it.

Since the LX 7G100 has no scores, no wins can be awarded to either side based on measured performance. The W7800 clearly has the only recorded results, but without a head-to-head test, the data cannot show which card wins in any specific workload. The comparison therefore rests on architectural and specification differences, which are detailed below.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different chip designs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 uses the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Plum Bonito. Its generation is listed as Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series). The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with an architecture labeled TrueGPU, and its generation is simply 7G100. No codename is recorded for the LX 7G100.

The manufacturing process differs slightly. The W7800 is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The W7800 packs 57,700 million transistors on a die size of 529 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 109.1 million per mm². The LX 7G100 has unknown transistor count, unknown die size, and no recorded density figure. This makes a direct comparison of transistor integration impossible.

Clock behavior also diverges. The W7800 has a base clock of 1895 MHz and a boost clock of 2525 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base clock and no boost clock listed. Both cards run memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, so memory clock parity exists. The memory configuration, however, differs significantly. The W7800 has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources are arranged differently. The W7800 has 4480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 128 raster operation units, and 70 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, but no ray tracing core count is listed. The higher shading unit count for the LX 7G100 does not translate to higher output rates, as the recorded pixel and texture rates show. The W7800 delivers 323.2 GPixel/s and 707.0 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. Floating point performance follows the same pattern. The W7800 achieves 45.25 TFLOPS FP32 and 90.50 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX 7G100 achieves 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

API support shows a partial overlap. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The W7800 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ, with the W7800 offering 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX 7G100 offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Power and physical specifications also differ, and these are covered in the specification section below.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has an average benchmark score of 164,894. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of zero.

Q: How does the W7800 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The W7800 sits within a narrow band. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 is 0.2% higher, the NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation is 0.7% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X is 2.2% higher. The NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB is 1.5% lower.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The W7800 has 32 GB of GDDR6, while the LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6. The W7800 uses a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and the LX 7G100 uses a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, while the W7800 has 4480 shading units. However, the W7800 has higher pixel rate, texture rate, and FP32 throughput.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both also support OpenGL 4.6. The W7800 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What process node does each card use?

A: The W7800 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards:

• Chip: W7800 uses Navi 31; LX 7G100 uses 7G106.
• Architecture: W7800 uses RDNA 3.0; LX 7G100 uses TrueGPU.
• Codename: W7800 is Plum Bonito; LX 7G100 has none listed.
• Generation: W7800 is Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series); LX 7G100 is 7G100.
• Process node: W7800 is 5 nm; LX 7G100 is 6 nm.
• Transistors: W7800 has 57,700 million; LX 7G100 is unknown.
• Die size: W7800 is 529 mm²; LX 7G100 is unknown.
• Transistor density: W7800 is 109.1M / mm²; LX 7G100 has none listed.
• Base clock: W7800 is 1895 MHz; LX 7G100 has none listed.
• Boost clock: W7800 is 2525 MHz; LX 7G100 has none listed.
• Memory size: W7800 is 32 GB; LX 7G100 is 12 GB.
• Memory bus width: W7800 is 256-bit; LX 7G100 is 192-bit.
• Memory bandwidth: W7800 is 576.0 GB/s; LX 7G100 is 432.0 GB/s.
• Shading units: W7800 has 4480; LX 7G100 has 6144.
• TMUs: W7800 has 280; LX 7G100 has 192.
• ROPs: W7800 has 128; LX 7G100 has 96.
• Ray tracing cores: W7800 has 70; LX 7G100 has none listed.
• Pixel rate: W7800 is 323.2 GPixel/s; LX 7G100 is 192.0 GPixel/s.
• Texture rate: W7800 is 707.0 GTexel/s; LX 7G100 is 384.0 GTexel/s.
• FP32: W7800 is 45.25 TFLOPS; LX 7G100 is 24.58 TFLOPS.
• FP16: W7800 is 90.50 TFLOPS (2:1); LX 7G100 is 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: W7800 is 260 W; LX 7G100 is 225 W.
• Power connectors: W7800 uses 2x 8-pin; LX 7G100 uses 1x 8-pin.
• Suggested PSU: W7800 is 600 W; LX 7G100 is 550 W.
• Display outputs: W7800 has 3x DisplayPort 2.1 and 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1; LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.
• Vulkan version: W7800 supports 1.4; LX 7G100 supports 1.3.
• Dimensions: W7800 is 280 mm (11 inches) long, 110 mm (4.3 inches) high, 40 mm (1.6 inches) wide; LX 7G100 is 294 mm (11.6 inches) long, 120 mm (4.7 inches) high, 49 mm (1.9 inches) wide.
• Release date: W7800 is 2023-04-12; LX 7G100 is 2026-06-17.
• Predecessor: W7800 has Radeon Pro Vega; LX 7G100 has none.
• Launch MSRP: W7800 is 2,499 USD; LX 7G100 has none listed.
• Percentile vs all GPUs: W7800 is 97; LX 7G100 is 50.
• Average benchmark score: W7800 is 164,894; LX 7G100 is zero.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on recorded data, the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 wins in every measurable performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 45.25 TFLOPS is nearly double the LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 323.2 GPixel/s far exceeds the 192.0 GPixel/s of the LX 7G100. The texture rate of 707.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s likewise shows a clear advantage for the W7800. Memory bandwidth favors the W7800 at 576.0 GB/s compared to 432.0 GB/s, and memory capacity is 32 GB versus 12 GB.

The W7800 also holds the only recorded benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 154,366 and Vulkan result of 175,422 give it a measurable performance profile, while the LX 7G100 has none. The percentile ranking reinforces this, with the W7800 at the 97th percentile among all GPUs and the LX 7G100 at the 50th percentile.

The LX 7G100 does have some advantages in the specification sheet. It has more shading units at 6144 versus 4480. It has a lower TDP at 225 W versus 260 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector instead of two, and has a lower suggested PSU of 550 W versus 600 W. It also offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, one more physical display connector than the W7800's three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs plus one mini-DisplayPort 2.1. The LX 7G100 is newer, with a release date of 2026-06-17 compared to the W7800's 2023-04-12.

These advantages are structural rather than performance-based. The higher shading unit count does not translate into higher output rates in the recorded data. The lower power draw and simpler power connector requirement make the LX 7G100 a more modest installation from a power perspective, but the W7800 still leads in all measured throughput metrics.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a one-sided comparison. The AMD Radeon PRO W7800 has benchmark results, an average score, a high percentile, and a full set of performance specifications. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark results, no average score, and a mid-tier percentile of 50. Every throughput metric in the database favors the W7800: FP32, FP16, pixel rate, texture rate, memory bandwidth, and memory capacity.

The W7800 also has a clear positioning among its nearest rivals. Its average score of 164,894 sits within 2.2% of the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and within 0.7% of the NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation. The LX 7G100 has no rival data, so its competitive standing cannot be assessed from the database.

The LX 7G100 offers a lower TDP, a single 8-pin connector, and a lower suggested PSU, which may suit systems with tighter power budgets. It also has more shading units and four display outputs. These factors do not compensate for the absence of any recorded benchmark performance.

For workloads where measured compute throughput matters, the W7800 is the only card with data supporting its capability. The LX 7G100 cannot be selected based on benchmark evidence because none exists. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the W7800 is the proven performer, while the LX 7G100 remains unverified in every measured category.