AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA occupy very different positions in the recorded database. The Radeon PRO W7700 has substantial benchmark data, while the LX ULTRA currently has no recorded scores, making direct performance comparisons impossible. The analysis below relies entirely on the available specifications and the measured results for the Radeon PRO W7700.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two graphics cards. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has two recorded test results: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 108245 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 129706. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 118976. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores recorded, resulting in an average score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs.

Without direct comparison data, the nearest rivals for the Radeon PRO W7700 provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA GB10 averages 117393, which is 1.3 percent below the Radeon PRO W7700. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation averages 117088, trailing by 1.6 percent. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB averages 114395, a 4 percent gap. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile averages 113944, sitting 4.4 percent behind. These margins are narrow, indicating that the Radeon PRO W7700 clusters tightly with several competing accelerators in the mid-to-high performance tier.

The Radeon PRO W7700 holds a 95th percentile position among all GPUs in the database. That percentile reflects its average score relative to the entire recorded population. The LX ULTRA, by contrast, has no measured performance data, so its percentile of 50 is a placeholder rather than a meaningful performance indicator. The recorded data shows that the Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms its nearest rivals by small single-digit percentages, while the LX ULTRA cannot be ranked against any competitor until benchmark results are entered.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, the wins are measurable. Its OpenCL score of 108245 and Vulkan score of 129706 both contribute to an average that places it ahead of four named NVIDIA products by margins ranging from 1.3 to 4.4 percent. The Vulkan result is notably higher than the OpenCL result, suggesting that the card performs particularly well in Vulkan workloads. The gap between Vulkan and OpenCL scores, roughly 21461 points, indicates a strong driver or hardware optimization for Vulkan APIs.

For the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, there are no recorded wins in the database. Without benchmark scores, the card cannot be said to win in any tested workload. The specifications do suggest areas where it might compete, but the absence of measurements means those remain hypothetical. The LX ULTRA has a higher shading unit count (6144 versus 3072) and more memory capacity (24 GB versus 16 GB), but those specifications have not been validated by any benchmark result.

The use-case split therefore favors the Radeon PRO W7700 in every measurable category. For OpenCL compute tasks, the Radeon PRO W7700 delivers a score of 108245. For Vulkan-based rendering, it delivers 129706. The LX ULTRA has no comparable data points, so any claim about its workload-specific strengths cannot be supported by the database.

Architecture Differences

The two cards stem from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 uses the Navi 32 chip, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip, built on the TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The Radeon PRO W7700 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256 bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. Both cards run their memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Radeon PRO W7700 has the narrower capacity but the wider bus, resulting in higher bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has more capacity but less bandwidth.

Compute resources also diverge. The Radeon PRO W7700 has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, but no recorded ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA doubles the shading unit count, which could benefit certain parallel workloads, but the Radeon PRO W7700 includes dedicated ray tracing hardware that the LX ULTRA lacks.

Pixel and texture rates reflect these differences. The Radeon PRO W7700 achieves 249.6 GPixel/s and 499.2 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. Despite having more shading units, the LX ULTRA has lower pixel and texture throughput. Floating point performance follows a similar pattern: the Radeon PRO W7700 reaches 31.95 TFLOPS FP32 and 63.90 TFLOPS FP16, while the LX ULTRA reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16.

Power delivery and connectivity also differ. The Radeon PRO W7700 has a TDP of 190 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. Both are dual-slot cards with PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces. Display outputs differ: the Radeon PRO W7700 provides four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the LX ULTRA provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

API support shows minor differences. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon PRO W7700 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Physical dimensions also vary: the Radeon PRO W7700 measures 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height, while the LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly favors the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 for any user requiring verified performance. Its average benchmark score of 118976 places it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, ahead of the NVIDIA GB10 by 1.3 percent, the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation by 1.6 percent, the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB by 4 percent, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile by 4.4 percent. Those margins are modest, but they are measured and reproducible.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA presents a specification sheet with some advantages, namely 24 GB of memory and 6144 shading units, but no benchmark results exist to confirm whether those specifications translate into real-world performance. The LX ULTRA also has lower FP32 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS versus 31.95 TFLOPS), lower memory bandwidth (432.0 GB/s versus 576.0 GB/s), and no ray tracing cores. Its 6 nm process node is larger than the Radeon PRO W7700's 5 nm node, and its TDP is higher at 225 W versus 190 W.

For users who need proven OpenCL or Vulkan performance, the database points exclusively to the Radeon PRO W7700. For users who require maximum memory capacity, the LX ULTRA offers 24 GB, but without any measured scores, its suitability for compute or rendering workloads remains unverified. The Radeon PRO W7700 also launched with an MSRP of 999 USD, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded launch price. The data indicates that the Radeon PRO W7700 is the only one of the two with a demonstrated performance footprint, and it sits comfortably among established NVIDIA competitors.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO W7700?

A: The average benchmark score is 118976, based on its Geekbench OpenCL score of 108245 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 129706.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No, the LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores, giving it an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO W7700 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 1.3 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GB10, 1.6 percent ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, 4 percent ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, and 4.4 percent ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile.

Q: Which card has more memory capacity?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 has higher memory bandwidth at 576.0 GB/s, compared to 432.0 GB/s for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA.

Q: What are the display output differences?

A: The Radeon PRO W7700 has four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the LX ULTRA has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in the following recorded specifications:

• Chip: Navi 32 for the Radeon PRO W7700, 7G105 for the LX ULTRA
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 versus TrueGPU
• Generation: Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) versus 7G100
• Process node: 5 nm versus 6 nm
• Transistors: 28,100 million versus unknown
• Die size: 346 mm² versus unknown
• Memory size: 16 GB versus 24 GB
• Memory bus width: 256 bit versus 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 576.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 3072 versus 6144
• Ray tracing cores: 48 versus none recorded
• Pixel rate: 249.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 499.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32 performance: 31.95 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16 performance: 63.90 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS
• TDP: 190 W versus 225 W
• Power connector: 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: 450 W versus 550 W
• Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan version: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Length: 241 mm versus 268 mm
• Height: 111 mm versus 112 mm
• Width: not recorded versus 40 mm
• Release date: 2023-11-12 versus 2026-03-16
• Production status: not recorded versus Active
• Launch MSRP: 999 USD versus none recorded
• Predecessor: Radeon Pro Vega versus none recorded
• Benchmark scores: two recorded tests versus none recorded
• Percentile: 95 versus 50
• Average benchmark score: 118976 versus 0