AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA target different segments of the workstation GPU market, with the data showing a clear split between a validated, professional compute card and a high-memory, high-throughput contender. The Radeon PRO W7600, based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, delivers a measured average benchmark score of 87,108 and sits in the 93rd percentile of all GPUs, while the LX ULTRA, using the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, an average score of 0, and sits in the 50th percentile. The LX ULTRA leads in raw specifications such as memory capacity, bandwidth, shading units, and FP32 throughput, but the W7600 holds the only actual performance measurements available, making the comparison one of confirmed results versus theoretical capability.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 wins in the only directly measured performance categories available in the database. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 81,528 and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 92,688, both of which are recorded data points. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has an empty benchmark array, meaning there are no Geekbench OpenCL or Vulkan results for it in the database, so it cannot claim any measured victory in compute or graphics workloads. The W7600 also wins in terms of established market position, as its 93rd percentile ranking versus all GPUs indicates it outperforms the vast majority of recorded graphics hardware, while the LX ULTRA's 50th percentile reflects the absence of any recorded performance data.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins on paper in nearly every raw hardware specification that does not require a benchmark result. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to the W7600's 8 GB, 128-bit bus, and 288.0 GB/s. The LX ULTRA also has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, versus the W7600's 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) both exceed the W7600's 19.99 TFLOPS and 39.98 TFLOPS (2:1), respectively. The LX ULTRA further leads in pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 156.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 312.3 GTexel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip and the codename Hotpink Bonefish, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip and the generation designation 7G100. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the W7600 has a known transistor count of 13,300 million and a die size of 204 mm², yielding a transistor density of 65.2M / mm², while the LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The W7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA lists its ray tracing core count as null. Neither card has tensor cores recorded. The W7600 supports the Vulkan 1.4 API, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3, and both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The W7600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, whereas the LX ULTRA uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, giving the latter double the bus lanes for data transfer. The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, while the W7600 is a single-slot card measuring 241 mm in length and 115 mm in height with no width recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher recorded benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has recorded scores of 81,528 in Geekbench OpenCL and 92,688 in Geekbench Vulkan, giving it an average benchmark score of 87,108. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking versus all GPUs.

Q: How do the memory capacities compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6,144 shading units, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 2,048 shading units, a threefold difference in this specification.

Q: Do both cards use the same process node?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the W7600 has a documented transistor count of 13,300 million and die size of 204 mm², while the LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Q: What is the difference in API support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W with a 1x 6-pin power connector. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W with a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Specification Differences

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA leads in memory size (24 GB versus 8 GB), memory bus width (192 bit versus 128 bit), memory bandwidth (432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s), shading units (6,144 versus 2,048), TMUs (192 versus 128), ROPs (96 versus 64), pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 156.2 GPixel/s), texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 312.3 GTexel/s), FP32 throughput (24.58 TFLOPS versus 19.99 TFLOPS), and FP16 throughput (49.15 TFLOPS versus 39.98 TFLOPS). The LX ULTRA also has a wider PCIe interface (PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8), a higher TDP (225 W versus 130 W), a higher suggested PSU (550 W versus 300 W), a dual-slot form factor versus single-slot, and a 1x 16-pin power connector versus a 1x 6-pin connector.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 leads in ray tracing cores (32 versus null), Vulkan API version (1.4 versus 1.3), and display outputs (4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a). The W7600 has a release date of 2023-08-02 and a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16 and no launch MSRP recorded. The W7600 has a known transistor count of 13,300 million and die size of 204 mm², while the LX ULTRA has unknown values for both. The W7600's base clock is 1720 MHz with a boost clock of 2440 MHz, while the LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock recorded. Both cards have a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs, so the comparison relies on the W7600's recorded results and the LX ULTRA's specification sheet. The W7600's Geekbench OpenCL score of 81,528 places it within a narrow range of its nearest rivals in the database. The NVIDIA Quadro GP100 has an average score of 87,445, which is 0.4% higher than the W7600's average. The NVIDIA CMP 40HX averages 85,637, which is 1.7% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile averages 91,134, which is 4.4% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 averages 91,671, which is 5.0% higher. These deltas show the W7600 performing within 5% of several established professional GPUs, with only the CMP 40HX trailing it among the listed rivals.

The LX ULTRA, by contrast, has no nearest rivals listed and no average benchmark score, so it cannot be placed against the same performance field. Its specification advantages are substantial in raw numbers, but without measured results, the data cannot confirm how those specifications translate into actual workload performance. The W7600's measured Geekbench Vulkan score of 92,688 is higher than its OpenCL score, indicating strong graphics API performance, but no equivalent data exists for the LX ULTRA to compare against either score.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 is the only one of these two cards with recorded performance data. Its average benchmark score of 87,108 and 93rd percentile ranking confirm it as a functional, competitive workstation GPU, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 81,528 and 92,688 respectively. Its nearest rivals in the database, including the NVIDIA RTX A4500 at 5.0% higher average score and the NVIDIA CMP 40HX at 1.7% lower, show it operating in a familiar performance band for professional hardware.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers a larger memory pool of 24 GB, higher bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, more shading units at 6,144, and greater FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS, all of which are meaningful advantages for memory-intensive or compute-heavy tasks if the card performs to its specifications. However, the absence of any benchmark results in the database, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking mean its real-world performance is entirely unverified. The W7600 also adds ray tracing cores, a newer Vulkan version, and DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while consuming less power at 130 W versus 225 W and requiring a smaller suggested PSU of 300 W versus 550 W. From the recorded data, the W7600 is the proven choice, while the LX ULTRA remains a high-specification option awaiting performance validation.