AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 and Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 are both active, 6 nm workstation graphics cards from TSMC, but they occupy very different positions in the database. The Radeon PRO W7600 holds a 93rd percentile ranking across all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 87,108, while the LX 7G100 sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of zero. The data confirms that the two cards are not direct competitors in measured performance, yet their architectural and specification differences create distinct use-case profiles.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon PRO W7600 wins in any scenario where measured software performance matters today. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 81,528 and Vulkan score of 92,688 place it firmly in the upper tier of the database, above 93 percent of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark results, meaning its actual application performance cannot be verified from the database. Any workload that relies on established compute frameworks, driver maturity, or known performance characteristics belongs to the Radeon PRO W7600 by default.

The LX 7G100 wins on memory capacity and memory bandwidth. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon PRO W7600 offers 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s. For datasets that exceed 8 GB, the LX 7G100 has a structural advantage that no benchmark score can override. The card also has a wider PCIe interface, using PCIe 4.0 x16 versus the Radeon's PCIe 4.0 x8, which could matter for data transfers in bandwidth-sensitive workflows.

The LX 7G100 also wins on raw compute resources. Its 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units exceed the Radeon's 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS both surpass the Radeon's 19.99 TFLOPS and 39.98 TFLOPS. These figures suggest the LX 7G100 has higher theoretical compute capacity, though the absence of measured results leaves that potential unverified.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon PRO W7600 uses the Navi 33 chip under AMD's RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation and lists the Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip under an architecture labeled TrueGPU, from the 7G100 generation, with no listed predecessor. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the Radeon's transistor count is documented at 13,300 million across a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are marked unknown.

Memory architecture differs substantially. The Radeon PRO W7600 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 at 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective, across a 128 bit bus. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 at the same 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective speed, but across a 192 bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s. The Radeon includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores at all. Neither card lists tensor cores.

The Radeon PRO W7600 is a single-slot card, 241 mm long, 115 mm tall, with a 130 W TDP and a single 6 pin power connector, plus a 300 W suggested PSU. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card, 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide, with a 225 W TDP, a single 8 pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Radeon supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the Radeon provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1, the LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is nearly identical, with both reaching DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Radeon supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX 7G100 lists Vulkan 1.3.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database, and the LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries at all. The only measured data available comes from the Radeon PRO W7600's own scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 81,528 and Vulkan result of 92,688 produce an average benchmark score of 87,108. That places it 0.4 percent behind the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, which averages 87,445. The Radeon also trails the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile by 4.4 percent (91,134) and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 by 5 percent (91,671). Against the NVIDIA CMP 40HX, the Radeon leads by 1.7 percent, as that card averages 85,637.

These nearest rival deltas show that the Radeon PRO W7600 sits within a tight cluster of professional GPUs, roughly 5 percent below the top of its measured group and about 1.7 percent above the lower end. The LX 7G100 cannot be placed in this cluster because the database contains no scores for it. Its theoretical FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS is 23 percent higher than the Radeon's 19.99 TFLOPS, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 23 percent higher than the Radeon's 312.3 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 23 percent higher than the Radeon's 156.2 GPixel/s. These deltas are consistent across all three rate metrics, suggesting a uniform compute scaling advantage on paper.

The Radeon PRO W7600's 8 GB memory capacity and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are its limiting factors in large-data workloads. The LX 7G100's 12 GB capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide 50 percent more capacity and 50 percent more bandwidth. For any workload that fits within 8 GB, the Radeon's measured performance wins. For any workload that exceeds 8 GB, the LX 7G100 is the only card in this comparison that can hold the data at all.

The Verdict

The Radeon PRO W7600 is the only card in this comparison with verified performance data. Its 93rd percentile ranking, average score of 87,108, and measured OpenCL and Vulkan results make it a known quantity for professional applications. The data shows it sits within 5 percent of the NVIDIA RTX A4500 family and within 0.4 percent of the NVIDIA Quadro GP100, which means it competes directly with established workstation GPUs. Its 130 W TDP, single-slot design, and 6 pin power requirement also indicate a lower power footprint than the LX 7G100's 225 W TDP, dual-slot design, and 8 pin requirement.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a speculative purchase. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average benchmark score reflect the absence of any recorded measurements. The hardware specifications suggest a high-throughput compute card: 6,144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, 12 GB memory, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The lack of ray tracing cores and the absence of measured results mean its real-world behavior is not established. The card's higher TDP and larger physical footprint also require more system resources.

For users who need verified performance today, the Radeon PRO W7600 is the defensible choice. Its launch MSRP is 599 USD. For users who need more than 8 GB of memory or who are willing to accept unverified performance based on theoretical specifications, the LX 7G100 offers a larger memory pool and higher raw compute rates. The database cannot confirm whether the LX 7G100's specifications translate into actual application performance, so the selection depends on whether verified results or hardware capacity takes priority.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has an average benchmark score of 87,108. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmarks.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO W7600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon PRO W7600 is 0.4 percent behind the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 (87,445), 1.7 percent ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 40HX (85,637), 4.4 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile (91,134), and 5 percent behind the NVIDIA RTX A4500 (91,671).

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Radeon PRO W7600 has a 130 W TDP, uses a single 6 pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, uses a single 8 pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU.

Q: Do both cards support the same display outputs?

A: No. The Radeon PRO W7600 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: Which card has ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7600 includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no ray tracing cores listed.