AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split between these two cards, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti dominating the majority of tests while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 claims a significant victory in one key API. Across the nine head-to-head benchmarks, NVIDIA wins seven, AMD wins two, but the margin of victory in AMD’s wins is substantial enough to make the comparison more nuanced than a simple tally.

The most striking result is in the Geekbench Vulkan test, where the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 68,634 against the NVIDIA card’s 47,784. That is a 43.6% advantage for AMD, the largest swing in either direction across all tested workloads. This suggests the RDNA 3.0 architecture has a particular strength in Vulkan-based applications, a factor that could be decisive for users running modern cross-platform titles or compute workloads that leverage this API.

NVIDIA’s wins are spread across both legacy and modern DirectX tests. In PassMark DirectX 10, the RTX 3060 Ti scores 132 versus 65 for AMD, a 50.8% lead that represents the second-largest margin in the comparison. The DirectX 12 test shows a 41% gap (78 vs 46) in NVIDIA’s favor, while DirectX 11 narrows to 23.3% (163 vs 125). Even the aging DirectX 9 test shows NVIDIA ahead by 14.5% (234 vs 200). These results indicate that NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture maintains a consistent edge across the DirectX API family, regardless of generation.

The general 3D performance gap is equally pronounced. In PassMark G3D, the RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,349 against 13,368 for the W7500, a 34.3% deficit for AMD. The GPU compute test tells a similar story: NVIDIA leads 10,006 to 5,910, a 40.9% margin. These are not marginal differences; they represent a substantial performance tier separation in rasterization and general compute.

The one bright spot for AMD outside Vulkan is the PassMark G2D test, where the W7500 scores 1,174 versus 989 for NVIDIA, an 18.7% advantage. While 2D performance is rarely a bottleneck in modern workloads, it does indicate that AMD’s card handles desktop compositing and 2D acceleration tasks with greater efficiency.

The Geekbench OpenCL result rounds out the picture with NVIDIA ahead at 78,927 versus 58,213, a 26.2% gap. This is particularly relevant for users running OpenCL-based compute applications, as the RTX 3060 Ti demonstrates significantly higher throughput in this cross-vendor API.

Looking at the average benchmark scores, the NVIDIA card posts 16,129 versus AMD’s 16,415. The difference is less than 2%, and both cards sit at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. This near-parity in the aggregate score, despite NVIDIA’s dominance in individual tests, reflects the outsized impact of AMD’s Vulkan win on the overall average. The W7500’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (average score 16,408, delta 0%) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, delta 0.3%), placing it in solid mid-range company. The RTX 3060 Ti’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014, delta 0.7%) and the Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351, delta -1.4%).

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the stronger performer in the majority of tested workloads, particularly where DirectX and OpenCL are involved. Its wins in DirectX 10, 11, and 12, along with OpenCL and GPU compute, cover the most common gaming and general-purpose compute scenarios. For users whose primary applications rely on these APIs, the RTX 3060 Ti is the clear choice.

However, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is not without its merits. The 43.6% Vulkan advantage is substantial and suggests that in Vulkan-centric environments—which include many modern game engines, emulators, and professional visualization tools—the W7500 could actually outperform its rival despite the overall score gap. The G2D win, while less impactful, further indicates that AMD’s card has specific strengths that might align with certain professional workflows.

The aggregate scores are so close (16,415 vs 16,129) that the average user would be hard-pressed to notice a difference in general responsiveness. The decision ultimately hinges on which APIs and workloads matter most to the user. If the software stack leans heavily on Vulkan, the W7500 deserves serious consideration. If the stack is DirectX-centric or involves OpenCL compute, the RTX 3060 Ti is the safer bet.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti wins in every DirectX benchmark tier, from DirectX 9 through DirectX 12 Ultimate. This makes it the superior choice for legacy DirectX applications, current DirectX 11 and 12 games, and any software that has not yet transitioned to Vulkan. The OpenCL win (26.2% ahead) extends this advantage to compute workloads that use OpenCL rather than vendor-specific APIs. The GPU compute test result (40.9% ahead) reinforces this pattern, suggesting that general-purpose GPU computing is firmly in NVIDIA’s territory.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins decisively in Vulkan, posting a 43.6% advantage. This is not a marginal edge; it is a commanding lead that could translate into real-world performance gains in Vulkan-based game titles, Vulkan compute applications, and any software built on modern cross-platform graphics APIs. The G2D win (18.7%) is secondary but indicates that the W7500 handles 2D workloads with greater efficiency.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has an average benchmark score of 16,415, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 16,129. The difference is approximately 1.8% in AMD’s favor.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two cards?

A: The biggest margin is in PassMark DirectX 10, where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 50.8% (132 vs 65). The second-largest is the Geekbench Vulkan test, where the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 leads by 43.6% (68,634 vs 47,784).

Q: How do the two cards compare in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has a recorded score for this test, posting 2,626 points. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 does not have a listed result for this benchmark.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: Both cards are ranked at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. They hold identical percentile rankings despite their differing benchmark profiles.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each card based on average score?

A: For the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, 0.3% delta). For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014, 0.7% delta) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351, -1.4% delta).

Q: How many benchmarks does each card win?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti wins 7 of the 9 head-to-head benchmarks. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins 2: Geekbench Vulkan and PassMark G2D.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures from different foundries. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses the GA104 chip based on Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. These process differences have a notable impact on transistor density: the AMD chip packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, yielding a density of 65.2 million transistors per mm². The NVIDIA chip contains 17,400 million transistors across a 392 mm² die, resulting in a density of 44.4 million per mm².

The compute configurations diverge significantly. The AMD card features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 28 ray tracing cores but no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card offers considerably more execution resources: 4,864 shading units, 152 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. It also includes 38 ray tracing cores and 152 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput reflects this difference: the RTX 3060 Ti delivers 16.20 TFLOPS versus 12.19 TFLOPS for the W7500. The FP16 figures are notable for their asymmetry: the AMD card achieves 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the NVIDIA card delivers 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory architectures also differ in fundamental ways. Both cards have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, but the NVIDIA card uses a 256-bit bus to achieve 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD card uses a 128-bit bus for 256.0 GB/s. The AMD card runs memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the NVIDIA card runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The narrower bus on the AMD card is partially offset by faster memory, but the NVIDIA card still achieves 75% more bandwidth.

Specification Differences

The most striking specification difference is in power consumption. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of just 70 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti consumes 200 W. This translates into a suggested power supply rating of 250 W for the AMD card versus 550 W for the NVIDIA card. The physical implications are immediate: the AMD card is single-slot with no power connectors, while the NVIDIA card is dual-slot and requires one 12-pin connector.

Dimensions differ accordingly. The AMD card measures 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The NVIDIA card is longer at 242 mm and slightly shorter at 112 mm in height, with no width specification listed. The AMD card is 8.5 inches long versus 9.5 inches for the NVIDIA card.

Display outputs are a differentiator. The AMD card offers four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the NVIDIA card provides one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. This means the AMD card supports the newer DisplayPort standard, which could be relevant for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution displays.

The bus interface also differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The wider bus on the NVIDIA card could provide additional bandwidth in certain scenarios, though the practical impact depends on the workload.

Clock speeds and production status round out the differences. The AMD card has a base clock of 1500 MHz and boost of 1700 MHz, while the NVIDIA card has a base of 1410 MHz and boost of 1665 MHz. The AMD card is listed as "Active" in production, while the NVIDIA card is marked "End-of-life." The AMD card was released on 2023-08-02, while the NVIDIA card launched on 2020-11-30. The launch MSRP for the AMD card is 429 USD, and for the NVIDIA card it is 399 USD.