AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 7600 represent two distinct approaches to the mainstream graphics card market, separated by roughly two and a half years of architectural evolution. The RTX 3060 Ti, built on Ampere and released at the end of 2020, relies on a large die and a wide memory bus, while the RX 7600, based on RDNA 3.0 and launched in mid-2023, uses a smaller, denser chip with higher clocks. Benchmark data shows the older NVIDIA card winning eight of ten head-to-head tests, including a commanding 38.9% lead in Vulkan performance, yet the AMD card counters with a 10.4% win in OpenCL compute and a lower power draw. The average benchmark scores tell a similar story: the RTX 3060 Ti posts 16,129 against the RX 7600’s 15,171, a gap of roughly 6.3%, placing the NVIDIA card at the 59th percentile of all GPUs compared to the AMD card’s 57th.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads with an average benchmark score of 16,129, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 7600’s 15,171. This places the RTX 3060 Ti at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7600 sits at the 57th percentile.

Q: In which benchmark does the AMD Radeon RX 7600 achieve its largest victory?

A: The RX 7600 wins the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 88,051 against the RTX 3060 Ti’s 78,927, a margin of 10.4%. This is the only benchmark where the AMD card wins by double digits.

Q: How does the RTX 3060 Ti perform in DirectX 12 ray tracing tests?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 3060 Ti scores 2,626, which is 13.7% higher than the RX 7600’s 2,310. The NVIDIA card also wins the Passmark DirectX 12 test by 34.5% (78 vs 58).

Q: What is the difference in TDP between the two cards?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has a TDP of 200 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W, while the RX 7600 has a lower TDP of 165 W and requires a 450 W PSU. The AMD card also uses a single 8-pin power connector compared to the NVIDIA card’s 1x 12-pin.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 boosts to 2655 MHz, significantly higher than the RTX 3060 Ti’s 1665 MHz boost. The RX 7600 also has a base clock of 1720 MHz versus the RTX 3060 Ti’s 1410 MHz.

Q: How do the two cards compare in compute performance (FP32)?

A: The RX 7600 delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is 34.3% higher than the RTX 3060 Ti’s 16.20 TFLOPS. This compute advantage is reflected in the OpenCL benchmark where the AMD card leads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs embody fundamentally different design philosophies. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses the GA104 chip built on Samsung’s 8 nm process, packing 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 44.4 million transistors per square millimeter. In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm node, with 13,300 million transistors on a much smaller 204 mm² die, achieving a density of 65.2 million per mm². The smaller, denser process node is a key reason the RX 7600 can operate at significantly higher clock speeds while consuming less power.

The compute architecture differs markedly as well. The RTX 3060 Ti features 4,864 shading units, 152 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 38 ray tracing cores, and 152 tensor cores. The RX 7600 has fewer execution resources: 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. However, the RX 7600’s higher clocks (boost of 2655 MHz vs 1665 MHz) allow it to achieve superior fill rates — 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate and 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate versus the RTX 3060 Ti’s 133.2 GPixel/s and 253.1 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card compensates with its tensor cores, which the AMD card lacks entirely.

Memory architecture is another major differentiator. The RTX 3060 Ti uses a 256-bit memory bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 running at 14 Gbps effective, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600 has a narrower 128-bit bus with the same 8 GB GDDR6 capacity but at 18 Gbps effective, resulting in 288.0 GB/s — 35.7% less bandwidth. This bandwidth deficit is likely a factor in the AMD card’s lower performance in memory-sensitive workloads.

Other differences include the PCIe interface: the RTX 3060 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 7600 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The display outputs also differ, with the NVIDIA card offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, whereas the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 3060 Ti is end-of-life, while the RX 7600 remains in active production. Physically, the RTX 3060 Ti is longer at 242 mm (9.5 inches) versus the RX 7600’s 204 mm (8 inches), though the AMD card is slightly taller (115 mm vs 112 mm).

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear picture for different use cases. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the stronger overall performer, winning 8 of 10 head-to-head benchmarks and posting a higher average score (16,129 vs 15,171). It is particularly dominant in Vulkan workloads, where it leads by 38.9%, and in DirectX 12, where it wins by 34.5%. Gamers prioritizing raw rasterization and modern API performance should favor the RTX 3060 Ti, as its Passmark G3D score of 20,349 is 22.3% higher than the RX 7600’s 16,634.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the better choice for compute-oriented tasks and efficiency-conscious builds. It wins the OpenCL benchmark by 10.4% (88,051 vs 78,927) and matches the NVIDIA card in DirectX 11 within 5.2%. Its lower TDP of 165 W versus 200 W, combined with a smaller physical footprint, makes it more suitable for compact or power-constrained systems. Users who prioritize raw FP32 compute (21.75 TFLOPS vs 16.20 TFLOPS) and higher clock speeds will find the RX 7600 appealing.

For legacy DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 workloads, the RTX 3060 Ti holds decisive advantages of 3.5% and 57.1% respectively. The data shows that if the workload involves Vulkan, ray tracing via DX12, or older DirectX versions, the RTX 3060 Ti is superior. If the workload is compute-heavy OpenCL or if power consumption is a primary concern, the RX 7600 is the better pick. The RTX 3060 Ti’s 59th percentile ranking versus the RX 7600’s 57th percentile reinforces its overall performance edge.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 7600 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GA104 | Navi 33 |

| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 8 nm (Samsung) | 6 nm (TSMC) |

| Transistors | 17,400 million | 13,300 million |

| Die Size | 392 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 44.4M / mm² | 65.2M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1410 MHz | 1720 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2655 MHz |

| Game Clock | N/A | 2250 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4864 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 152 | 128 |

| ROPs | 80 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 38 | 32 |

| Tensor Cores | 152 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 16.20 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 200 W | 165 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) |

| Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 115 mm (4.5 inches) |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2020-11-30 | 2023-05-24 |

| Launch MSRP | 399 USD | 269 USD |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single margin in the entire comparison belongs to the RTX 3060 Ti in Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 47,784 against the RX 7600’s 34,401 — a 38.9% advantage. This suggests NVIDIA’s driver and architecture handle Vulkan workloads with notably greater efficiency. The gap is so substantial that it alone accounts for a significant portion of the RTX 3060 Ti’s overall average score superiority.

The RTX 3060 Ti also dominates in legacy DirectX tests. In Passmark DirectX 10, it scores 132 versus 84, a 57.1% lead, the largest percentage difference in any test. DirectX 12 shows a 34.5% margin (78 vs 58), and DirectX 9 a narrower 3.5% edge (234 vs 226). These results indicate that the NVIDIA card retains strong performance across a wide range of API generations, while the RX 7600’s newer architecture does not translate into better legacy support.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, a modern ray tracing workload, goes to the RTX 3060 Ti with a score of 2,626 against 2,310, a 13.7% margin. This is notable because the RX 7600 has higher clock speeds and more TFLOPS, yet still falls behind in this DX12 test. The Passmark G3D test reinforces this trend, with the RTX 3060 Ti scoring 20,349 versus 16,634, a 22.3% advantage. Similarly, Passmark GPU Compute shows the NVIDIA card winning 10,006 to 8,790, a 13.8% lead, despite the RX 7600’s higher theoretical FP32 output.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600’s strongest showing is in Geekbench OpenCL, where its 88,051 score beats the RTX 3060 Ti’s 78,927 by 10.4%. This aligns with the RX 7600’s higher FP32 throughput (21.75 TFLOPS vs 16.20 TFLOPS) and suggests the RDNA 3.0 architecture excels in general-purpose compute tasks. The RX 7600 also edges out the RTX 3060 Ti in Passmark DirectX 11, scoring 172 versus 163, a 5.2% margin. The two cards are nearly identical in Passmark G2D, with the RTX 3060 Ti winning by a hair at 989 versus 984 (0.5%).

Overall, the RTX 3060 Ti wins 8 of 10 tests, with its victories spanning 0.5% to 57.1%. The RX 7600’s two wins are in compute-oriented and DX11 workloads. The data suggests that for gaming and most graphics applications, the RTX 3060 Ti is the stronger card, while the RX 7600 holds its own in compute and efficiency metrics.