AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Arc Pro B70 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and the Intel Arc Pro B70. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the Intel Arc Pro B70 has no benchmark scores listed in the database. This makes a direct performance comparison impossible based on measured results. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500, however, has a full set of benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 16415, and a percentile ranking of 59 against all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50, which reflects the absence of recorded data rather than actual performance.

For the AMD Radeon PRO W7500, the benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58213 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 68634. The Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 13368, a G2D score of 1174, and a GPU compute score of 5910. Older DirectX tests show a DirectX 9 score of 200, a DirectX 11 score of 125, a DirectX 10 score of 65, and a DirectX 12 score of 46. These numbers indicate a strong compute-oriented workload performance, with the Vulkan score exceeding the OpenCL score by roughly 18%. The DirectX 9 score is significantly higher than the DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores, which suggests that the card handles legacy workloads efficiently relative to newer API paths.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 provide context for its average score of 16415. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell sits at an average score of 16408, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, 0.4% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, which is 0.5% higher than the W7500. These deltas place the W7500 in a tight performance cluster where the differences between rivals are within a single percentage point. The data shows that the W7500 effectively trades positions with these cards, landing in the same performance tier despite very different architectures and market positions.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The Intel Arc Pro B70 uses the BMG-G31 chip based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage Pro Series generation. The process nodes differ, with the AMD card built on a 6 nm process at TSMC and the Intel card built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The AMD chip has 13,300 million transistors on a die size of 204 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel chip has an unknown transistor count on a die size of 368 mm², with no transistor density recorded.

The memory systems are substantially different. The W7500 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The B70 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The B70 has four times the memory capacity and more than double the memory bandwidth. Clock speeds also differ: the W7500 runs at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz, while the B70 runs at a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The memory clock for the W7500 is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the B70 uses 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

The compute units scale accordingly. The W7500 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The B70 has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The B70 has more than double the shading units and texture mapping units, and exactly double the ROPs. The pixel rate for the W7500 is 108.8 GPixel/s, while the B70 reaches 358.4 GPixel/s. The texture rate for the W7500 is 190.4 GTexel/s, while the B70 reaches 716.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 12.19 TFLOPS for the W7500 and 22.94 TFLOPS for the B70, with FP16 rates of 24.37 TFLOPS and 45.88 TFLOPS respectively, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Power requirements differ significantly. The W7500 has a TDP of 70 W, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W power supply. The B70 has a TDP of 230 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The physical dimensions also differ: the W7500 is a single-slot card measuring 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The B70 is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 39 mm in width. The bus interface differs as well, with the W7500 using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the B70 using PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs show the W7500 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the B70 has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The B70 also has a higher memory bandwidth of 608.0 GB/s compared to 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the performance difference based on the database scores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has an average benchmark score of 16415 and a percentile ranking of 59. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has no benchmark scores recorded, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50, so no direct comparison can be made from measured data.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The W7500's average score of 16415 is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16408, 0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361, 0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16351, 0.4% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16504, -0.5% delta).

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W, uses no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W power supply. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has a TDP of 230 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: What is the maximum FP32 throughput for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 delivers 12.19 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Arc Pro B70 delivers 22.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 32 ray tracing cores. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 28 ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload requirements. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is a low-power, single-slot solution with a 70 W TDP, no power connectors, and a 250 W suggested power supply. It has recorded benchmark scores that place it at the 59th percentile, with an average score of 16415 that sits within 0.5% of several established rivals. The Intel Arc Pro B70 is a high-power, dual-slot solution with a 230 W TDP, a single 8-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply. It has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its measured performance undefined.

The W7500 is the only card of the two with measured performance data. It competes directly with cards like the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, all within a 0.5% performance band. The B70 offers a much larger memory pool, higher clock speeds, more compute units, and higher raw throughput specifications. The B70 also uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus the W7500's PCIe 4.0 x8, and it provides an HDMI 2.1a output in addition to three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

The choice between these two cards depends on whether the user prioritizes measured, verified performance in a compact and efficient package, or raw specifications and memory capacity in a larger, more power-hungry design. The W7500 launch MSRP is 429 USD, while the B70 launch MSRP is 949 USD. The B70 has a later release date of 2026-03-25, while the W7500 was released on 2023-08-02. The W7500 lists its predecessor as the Radeon Pro Vega, while the B70 has no predecessor recorded.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification category. The chip design uses Navi 33 for the W7500 and BMG-G31 for the B70. The architecture is RDNA 3.0 versus Xe2-HPG. The process node is 6 nm versus 5 nm, both from TSMC. The transistor count is 13,300 million versus unknown. The die size is 204 mm² versus 368 mm². The base clock is 1500 MHz versus 2280 MHz, and the boost clock is 1700 MHz versus 2800 MHz. Memory capacity is 8 GB versus 32 GB, both GDDR6, with bus widths of 128 bit versus 256 bit. Bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s versus 608.0 GB/s. Shading units are 1792 versus 4096, TMUs are 112 versus 256, ROPs are 64 versus 128, and ray tracing cores are 28 versus 32. Pixel rate is 108.8 GPixel/s versus 358.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 190.4 GTexel/s versus 716.8 GTexel/s. FP32 is 12.19 TFLOPS versus 22.94 TFLOPS. FP16 is 24.37 TFLOPS versus 45.88 TFLOPS. TDP is 70 W versus 230 W. Slot width is single-slot versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus one 8-pin. Suggested PSU is 250 W versus 550 W. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Dimensions are 216 mm by 115 mm by 20 mm versus 267 mm by 110 mm by 39 mm. The W7500 has a production status of Active, while the B70 has no production status recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins in efficiency and physical footprint. Its 70 W TDP requires no power connectors and only a 250 W suggested power supply. Its single-slot, 20 mm width design fits into compact chassis. It has recorded benchmark scores, including a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58213 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 68634, which provide verified performance data. Its average benchmark score of 16415 places it in a tight cluster with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, all within a 0.5% range. It also has a lower launch MSRP of 429 USD.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 wins in raw specifications and capacity. Its 32 GB memory pool is four times larger, and its 608.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than double. Its 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs represent significantly higher compute throughput. Its FP32 rate of 22.94 TFLOPS is nearly double the W7500's 12.19 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 358.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 716.8 GTexel/s are both substantially higher. Its base clock of 2280 MHz and boost clock of 2800 MHz exceed the W7500's clocks. It uses a newer PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, offers an HDMI 2.1a output, and has a later release date. Its launch MSRP is 949 USD. The B70 also has a higher TDP of 230 W, which indicates a larger power delivery requirement but also supports its higher performance targets. The W7500 remains the only card with measured benchmark data in the database, so its performance position is confirmed while the B70's is not.