AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Arc Pro B390 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and the Intel Arc Pro B390. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, which means there are no recorded side-by-side test results for these two accelerators. This absence of comparative data is itself informative: any analysis must rely on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the AMD part and the architectural specifications of the Intel part.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a substantial set of recorded benchmark results. Its average benchmark score stands at 16415, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 58213, while the Geekbench Vulkan score reaches 68634. In Passmark tests, the GPU compute score is 5910, the G3D score is 13368, and the G2D score is 1174. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 65 for DirectX 10, 125 for DirectX 11, 46 for DirectX 12, and 200 for DirectX 9.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmarks in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and the percentile versus all GPUs is 50. This means the database has no measured performance data for the Intel part at this time. The nearest rivals for the AMD card provide some context for its measured performance. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, which is 0% different from the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, a 0.3% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, a 0.4% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, which is 0.5% lower than the AMD card in this comparison metric.

Without head-to-head results, the performance gap between the two cards cannot be quantified from direct measurements. The AMD card's 12.19 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 190.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate a different performance class than the Intel card's 7.680 TFLOPS and 120.0 GTexel/s, but these are specification values, not benchmark outcomes. The recorded data shows no wins for either card in head-to-head testing because no such tests exist in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses the Panther Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation under the Panther Lake family. The process node is 3 nm, fabricated by Intel itself. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, and no transistor density figure is recorded.

The AMD card has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel card has 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation pipelines, with 12 ray tracing cores. The AMD card delivers a pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s. The Intel card delivers 60.00 GPixel/s and 120.0 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture differs significantly. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. The Intel card uses system shared memory, with system shared type, system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. The clock section for memory is simply marked "System Shared".

The AMD card has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz. The Intel card has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The boost clock on the Intel part is substantially higher, but the base clock is much lower, reflecting different power management strategies for an integrated graphics processor.

The AMD card is a discrete solution with a single-slot form factor, 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. It uses no power connectors and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. Its TDP is 70 W. The Intel card is an integrated graphics processor, listed as IGP for slot width and bus interface. It has no dimensions recorded, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. Its TDP is 80 W.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Intel card's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent". The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 429 USD. The Intel card has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear distinction between these two products. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is a discrete workstation card with measured benchmark results. Its average benchmark score of 16415 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the database cluster closely around this score, with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16408 and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361. This indicates the AMD card performs in a competitive mid-range class.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is an integrated graphics processor. It has no recorded benchmarks, no average score, and sits at the 50th percentile by default classification. The database shows zero measured performance data for this part. The specification differences reinforce this: the Intel card relies on system shared memory, has no discrete form factor, and offers lower theoretical throughput numbers. The AMD card provides 12.19 TFLOPS FP32 versus 7.680 TFLOPS for the Intel part. The AMD card provides 190.4 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. The AMD card provides 108.8 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s.

The data indicates the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is the only one of the two with established performance credentials in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B390, while architecturally newer with a 3 nm process and a higher boost clock of 2500 MHz, lacks any recorded benchmark evidence. Its integrated nature and shared memory configuration suggest it targets a different use case, likely embedded or portable systems where discrete graphics are not feasible.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: for measured performance, the AMD card is the verified option. For the Intel part, the database currently offers no performance confirmation.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification category in the database.

Process and manufacturing: The AMD card uses a 6 nm TSMC process. The Intel card uses a 3 nm Intel process. The AMD card has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Intel card has unknown transistor count and die size.

Clock speeds: The AMD card has a 1500 MHz base clock and a 1700 MHz boost clock. The Intel card has a 300 MHz base clock and a 2500 MHz boost clock. The AMD memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective. The Intel memory clock is system shared.

Compute units: The AMD card has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 RT cores. The Intel card has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 RT cores.

Throughput: The AMD card delivers 12.19 TFLOPS FP32, 24.37 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), 108.8 GPixel/s, and 190.4 GTexel/s. The Intel card delivers 7.680 TFLOPS FP32, 15.36 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), 60.00 GPixel/s, and 120.0 GTexel/s.

Memory: The AMD card uses 8 GB GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Power and form factor: The AMD card has a 70 W TDP, single-slot width, no power connectors, a 250 W suggested PSU, and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The Intel card has an 80 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and IGP bus interface.

Dimensions and outputs: The AMD card measures 216 mm by 115 mm by 20 mm and provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel card has no recorded dimensions and portable device dependent display outputs.

Release and status: The AMD card was released on 2023-08-02 and is Active. The Intel card was released on 2026-01-26 and is Active. The AMD predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega. The Intel predecessor is HD Graphics-WM.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has an average benchmark score of 16415. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 delivers 12.19 TFLOPS FP32. The Intel Arc Pro B390 delivers 7.680 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What process nodes do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: What are the TDP values for the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins in every measured and specification category where data exists. It has a higher FP32 throughput at 12.19 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s doubles the Intel card's 120.0 GTexel/s in practical terms. Its pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s exceeds the Intel card's 60.00 GPixel/s. The AMD card has dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel card depends on system shared memory. The AMD card has more shading units (1792 versus 1536), more TMUs (112 versus 48), more ROPs (64 versus 24), and more ray tracing cores (28 versus 12).

The AMD card also wins on form factor for workstation use. It is a discrete single-slot card with 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, PCIe 4.0 x8 connectivity, and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Intel card is an integrated processor with no discrete dimensions, no dedicated display outputs, and an IGP bus interface. The AMD card was released on 2023-08-02, while the Intel card is dated 2026-01-26, but the newer release does not translate into recorded performance advantages.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 wins in a few specific specification areas. Its process node is smaller at 3 nm versus 6 nm, which typically indicates higher manufacturing efficiency. Its boost clock is higher at 2500 MHz versus 1700 MHz. Its TDP is slightly higher at 80 W versus 70 W. Its base clock is lower at 300 MHz versus 1500 MHz. These advantages are architectural rather than measured.

For use cases, the data supports the AMD card for discrete workstation graphics tasks where dedicated memory, multiple display outputs, and established benchmark performance matter. The Intel card appears suited for integrated graphics scenarios, likely portable devices or compact systems where a discrete card cannot be installed. The database shows the AMD card at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel card sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded scores. The AMD card's nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, scores nearly identically at 16408, confirming the AMD part occupies a legitimate performance tier. Until the Intel card receives benchmark entries, its actual performance remains unverified in the database.