AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Arc A310E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast between these two GPUs, though direct head-to-head benchmark scores are absent from the database. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a full set of nine benchmark results, while the Intel Arc A310E currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numeric comparison impossible, but the available data for the AMD part provides context for its performance tier.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 achieves an average benchmark score of 16415 across its recorded tests. Its strongest single result comes from Geekbench Vulkan at 68634, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 58213. In Passmark tests, the GPU delivers a G3D score of 13368, a G2D score of 1174, and a GPU compute score of 5910. Legacy DirectX tests show lower numbers: DirectX 9 scores 200, DirectX 11 scores 125, and DirectX 10 scores 65, with DirectX 12 at 46.

The AMD part sits at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals by average score are tightly clustered: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408 (a 0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351 (0.4% ahead). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, placing it 0.5% ahead of the W7500. This clustering indicates the W7500 performs within a very narrow band around these four competitors, with no meaningful performance gap in either direction.

For the Intel Arc A310E, the absence of benchmark data means the database cannot yet place it relative to any rivals. Its percentile rank of 50 is a default position, not a measured result. The head-to-head section remains empty, and neither GPU records a win count. Until benchmark results are populated for the A310E, any direct performance comparison relies solely on the architectural specifications listed below.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share a manufacturing process: both use a 6 nm node at TSMC. This is where the similarities end. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation (Navi III Series). The Intel Arc A310E uses the DG2-128 chip based on Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). Intel lists no codename for this part.

Transistor counts differ substantially. The AMD chip packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The Intel chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, for a density of 45.9 million per mm². The AMD die is larger and denser, reflecting a more complex compute layout.

Clock behavior also differs. The AMD part runs at a 1500 MHz base clock and 1700 MHz boost clock. The Intel part runs at a flat 2000 MHz for both base and boost, a higher sustained frequency. Memory clocks diverge: AMD uses 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective transfer, while Intel uses 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective. The AMD GPU has a 128-bit memory bus, while Intel uses a 64-bit bus. This directly impacts bandwidth: AMD delivers 256.0 GB/s against Intel's 124.0 GB/s, exactly double.

Compute resources show a wide gap. The AMD GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel GPU has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate for AMD is 108.8 GPixel/s versus 32.00 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 190.4 GTexel/s versus 64.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute reaches 12.19 TFLOPS on AMD versus 3.072 TFLOPS on Intel. FP16 rates are 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) and 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) respectively.

Memory capacity differs as well: 8 GB of GDDR6 on the AMD card versus 4 GB of GDDR6 on the Intel card. Display outputs are another distinction: AMD offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while Intel offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0. Both use PCIe 4.0 x8, both are single-slot designs, both require no power connectors, and both list a suggested PSU of 250 W. Power draw is close: 70 W for AMD, 75 W for Intel. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Production status differs: the AMD card is Active, while the Intel card is End-of-life. AMD released on 2023-08-02, Intel on 2024-03-31. AMD's predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega, Intel's is Xe Graphics. Intel's successor is Battlemage; AMD has no successor listed. Physical dimensions favor Intel: 168 mm length, 69 mm height, 20 mm width versus AMD's 216 mm length, 115 mm height, 20 mm width.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins decisively on raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rating of 12.19 TFLOPS is roughly four times the Intel part's 3.072 TFLOPS. Texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s triples Intel's 64.00 GTexel/s. Pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s more than triples Intel's 32.00 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s doubles Intel's 124.0 GB/s. The AMD card also holds a 2x advantage in memory capacity (8 GB versus 4 GB), which matters for larger datasets and higher resolution textures.

The AMD card's 28 ray tracing cores versus 6 on Intel suggests stronger ray tracing workloads, though no specific ray tracing benchmarks are recorded. The shading unit count of 1792 versus 768 implies better general shader performance. The wider 128-bit memory bus versus 64-bit also favors AMD for memory-intensive operations.

The Intel Arc A310E wins on physical footprint. At 168 mm length and 69 mm height, it is substantially smaller than AMD's 216 mm by 115 mm card. Both share the same 20 mm width and single-slot design. Intel also runs a higher base clock (2000 MHz versus 1500 MHz), though the boost clock is also 2000 MHz against AMD's 1700 MHz. This higher clock rate does not compensate for the large gap in compute resources.

Intel's production status as End-of-life means it has a defined successor (Battlemage), while AMD's Active status suggests ongoing availability. The Intel card also has a later release date, but the database records no benchmark scores for it, so its practical performance cannot be confirmed.

The database shows no wins recorded for either GPU in head-to-head tests. The measured advantage for AMD comes from its specification sheet and benchmark results. The Intel card's higher clock speed and smaller size are its distinguishing strengths, but without benchmark data, these do not translate into verified performance wins.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO W7500?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has an average benchmark score of 16415 across nine recorded tests, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists an empty benchmark array for the Intel Arc A310E, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 runs at 1500 MHz base and 1700 MHz boost. The Intel Arc A310E runs at 2000 MHz for both base and boost, giving it a higher sustained frequency.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 delivers 256.0 GB/s over a 128-bit bus, while the Intel Arc A310E delivers 124.0 GB/s over a 64-bit bus. AMD has exactly double the bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc A310E has 6 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is listed as Active. The Intel Arc A310E is listed as End-of-life, with Battlemage noted as its successor.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 | Intel Arc A310E |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | DG2-128 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Codename | Hotpink Bonefish | null |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | Alchemist (Arc 3) |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 7,200 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 157 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 45.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 124.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 768 |

| TMUs | 112 | 32 |

| ROPs | 64 | 16 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 6 |

| Pixel Rate | 108.8 GPixel/s | 32.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 190.4 GTexel/s | 64.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) | 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 70 W | 75 W |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |

| Dimensions | 216 mm x 115 mm x 20 mm | 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-08-02 | 2024-03-31 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | Xe Graphics |

| Successor | null | Battlemage |

| Launch MSRP | 429 USD | null |

Shared specifications include 6 nm TSMC process, GDDR6 memory type, single-slot width, no power connectors, 250 W suggested PSU, PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 delivers roughly four times the FP32 compute of the Intel Arc A310E (12.19 TFLOPS versus 3.072 TFLOPS), double the memory bandwidth (256.0 GB/s versus 124.0 GB/s), and double the memory capacity (8 GB versus 4 GB). Its pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s dwarf the Intel part's 32.00 GPixel/s and 64.00 GTexel/s. The AMD card also has more than double the shading units (1792 versus 768) and over four times the ray tracing cores (28 versus 6).

The AMD card's average benchmark score of 16415 places it at the 59th percentile, with nearest rivals within a 0.5% band. This confirms it performs at a level comparable to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M. The Intel Arc A310E has no benchmark data to establish its performance tier.

The Intel Arc A310E offers a smaller physical footprint (168 mm versus 216 mm length, 69 mm versus 115 mm height) and a higher flat clock of 2000 MHz. These advantages do not overcome the compute resource gap. The Intel card's End-of-life status and successor (Battlemage) also suggest it is a transitional product.

For workloads requiring high compute throughput, memory bandwidth, or ray tracing, the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is the clear choice based on recorded specifications. For compact installations where size is the primary constraint and compute demands are minimal, the Intel Arc A310E fits a smaller space. The database currently contains no benchmark results for the Intel card, so its real-world performance remains unverified. The AMD card's measured scores, however, confirm it operates at a competitive level within its peer group.