AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER occupy distinctly different tiers within the database, evidenced by their core specifications and performance metrics. The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers significantly higher raw computational throughput, while the Radeon PRO W7400 is defined by its low power envelope and professional form factor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains direct benchmark results for the RTX 5070 SUPER, while the Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores. This lack of comparable data means a direct head-to-head comparison cannot be made from measurements. The RTX 5070 SUPER records a score of 2690 on the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs tracked. Its average benchmark score is also 2690.

The nearest rivals in the database for the RTX 5070 SUPER provide context for this score. The NVIDIA Quadro K1100M averages 2664, a 1% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 averages 2662, also 1.1% behind. The Intel Arc Pro B50 averages 2660, a 1.1% gap, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 averages 2645, 1.7% lower. These deltas show the RTX 5070 SUPER leads these comparable entries by a narrow margin, between 1% and 1.7% depending on the rival.

The Radeon PRO W7400 sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs but has no benchmark entries or nearest rivals in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. This absence of performance data means the recorded database cannot quantify its standing relative to the RTX 5070 SUPER, nor can it establish any wins for either card in a measured comparison. The RTX 5070 SUPER has one recorded win (its own benchmark entry), while the Radeon PRO W7400 has none.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on different architectures from different generations. The Radeon PRO W7400 uses AMD’s RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 33 chip, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip and belongs to the GeForce 50 generation.

The manufacturing process differs. The Radeon PRO W7400 is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 5070 SUPER uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The transistor counts reflect the process and design differences. The Radeon PRO W7400 contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, a density of 65.2M per mm². The RTX 5070 SUPER contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, a density of 118.3M per mm². The NVIDIA chip packs more than double the transistors into a die that is only about 29% larger in area.

The Radeon PRO W7400 uses 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 28 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. It includes 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card has roughly 3.6 times the shading units, 1.8 times the TMUs, and 1.25 times the ROPs of the AMD card.

Clock behavior also diverges sharply. The Radeon PRO W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The NVIDIA card’s boost clock is more than double the AMD card’s boost figure. These clock differences, combined with the shading unit counts, explain the large gap in computed throughput.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two cards aimed at different priorities. The RTX 5070 SUPER is the higher-performance part by every measurable compute metric in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS is substantially higher than the Radeon PRO W7400’s 7.885 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s compares to 123.2 GTexel/s for the AMD card, and its pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s compares to 70.40 GPixel/s.

The RTX 5070 SUPER also carries more memory: 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon PRO W7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has more memory, a wider bus, faster memory type, and nearly four times the bandwidth.

The Radeon PRO W7400’s advantage lies in its power and physical profile. Its TDP is 55 W, compared to 275 W for the RTX 5070 SUPER. It requires no power connectors, while the NVIDIA card needs a single 16-pin connector. The AMD card is a single-slot design measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The RTX 5070 SUPER is dual-slot, measuring 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm. The AMD card also lists a suggested PSU of 250 W, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has no suggested PSU recorded.

Users who require maximum compute performance, larger memory capacity, and higher bandwidth should select the RTX 5070 SUPER based on the recorded specifications. Users who need a compact, low-power card that fits in tight chassis constraints should select the Radeon PRO W7400. The data does not support a performance-based choice for the AMD card, as it has no recorded benchmarks, but its power and size metrics are clearly favorable.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 for the Radeon PRO W7400, Blackwell 2.0 for the RTX 5070 SUPER.
• Process node: 6 nm for the AMD card, 5 nm for the NVIDIA card.
• Transistors: 13,300 million vs 31,100 million.
• Die size: 204 mm² vs 263 mm².
• Base clock: 330 MHz vs 2325 MHz.
• Boost clock: 1100 MHz vs 2512 MHz.
• Memory clock: 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).
• Memory size: 8 GB GDDR6 vs 18 GB GDDR7.
• Memory bus: 128 bit vs 192 bit.
• Memory bandwidth: 172.8 GB/s vs 672.0 GB/s.
• Shading units: 1792 vs 6400.
• TMUs: 112 vs 200.
• ROPs: 64 vs 80.
• RT cores: 28 vs 50.
• Tensor cores: none vs 200.
• Pixel rate: 70.40 GPixel/s vs 201.0 GPixel/s.
• Texture rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 502.4 GTexel/s.
• FP32: 7.885 TFLOPS vs 32.15 TFLOPS.
• FP16: 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1).
• TDP: 55 W vs 275 W.
• Slot width: Single-slot vs Dual-slot.
• Power connectors: None vs 1x 16-pin.
• Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 vs PCIe 5.0 x16.
• Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.
• Dimensions: 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm vs 245 mm x 115 mm x 40 mm.
• Release date: 2025-08-02 for the AMD card, 2025-12-31 for the NVIDIA card.

Shared specifications include DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither card has a recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 7.885 TFLOPS for the Radeon PRO W7400.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The Radeon PRO W7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the power draw of each card?

A: The Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W and requires no power connectors. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the Radeon PRO W7400 have tensor cores?

A: No, the Radeon PRO W7400 has no tensor cores. The RTX 5070 SUPER includes 200 tensor cores.

Q: What benchmark score does the RTX 5070 SUPER achieve?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 on the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: How do the physical sizes compare?

A: The Radeon PRO W7400 is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm. The RTX 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm.