AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010. The database contains no shared test results where both cards ran the same workload, so a direct score comparison is not possible from the available measurements.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, the database includes a single benchmark entry: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 2893. This places the card in the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no benchmark scores recorded, and its percentile rank is listed at 50, though this value appears without associated test data.

The RTX 4010's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance level. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2907, which is 0.5% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910, 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2913, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2923, 1% higher. These deltas are all within one percent, indicating that the RTX 4010 sits in a very tight performance cluster around the 2893 to 2923 range.

Since the AMD card has no benchmark entries, the recorded data offers no quantitative basis for declaring either card a winner in any specific test. The absence of shared workloads means any direct performance comparison would rely on specification analysis rather than measured results.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What is the only benchmark score available for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010?

A: The RTX 4010 has one recorded result: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2893.

Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to its closest rival in the database?

A: The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, which scores 2907, a 0.5% advantage over the RTX 4010's 2893.

Q: What percentile does the RTX 4010 achieve among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4010 sits in the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: What percentile does the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 achieve among all GPUs?

A: The database lists the AMD card at the 50th percentile, though no benchmark scores are recorded to substantiate this rank.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The chip is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, which yields a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip built on Ampere architecture. It belongs to the GeForce 40-series. The chip is fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung, containing 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter.

The AMD card integrates 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It carries 28 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card integrates 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. It carries 6 ray tracing cores and 24 tensor cores, while the AMD card lists no tensor core count.

The AMD card uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, both rated at 7.885 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card also uses a 1:1 ratio, with both FP16 and FP32 rated at 2.706 TFLOPS. The AMD card's pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card's pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s.

Both cards list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support. The display outputs differ: the AMD card uses 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the NVIDIA card uses 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a.

Specification Differences

The process node differs: the AMD card uses 6 nm at TSMC, while the NVIDIA card uses 8 nm at Samsung. Transistor counts differ at 13,300 million for AMD versus 8,700 million for NVIDIA. Die sizes are close at 204 mm² for AMD and 200 mm² for NVIDIA. Transistor density stands at 65.2M per mm² for AMD versus 43.5M per mm² for NVIDIA.

Clock speeds show significant differences. The AMD base clock is 330 MHz with a boost of 1100 MHz. The NVIDIA base clock is 1417 MHz with a boost of 1762 MHz. Memory clocks are 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) for AMD versus 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA.

Memory capacity differs: 8 GB GDDR6 for AMD versus 4 GB GDDR6 for NVIDIA. Bus width is 128 bit for AMD versus 64 bit for NVIDIA. Memory bandwidth is 172.8 GB/s for AMD versus 96.00 GB/s for NVIDIA.

Compute resources differ substantially: 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs for AMD versus 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs for NVIDIA. Ray tracing cores are 28 for AMD versus 6 for NVIDIA. Tensor cores exist only on the NVIDIA card at 24.

Pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s for AMD versus 28.19 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s for AMD versus 42.29 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 and FP16 are 7.885 TFLOPS for AMD versus 2.706 TFLOPS for NVIDIA.

Power draw is rated at 55 W for AMD versus 50 W for NVIDIA. Both are single-slot cards with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. Both use PCIe 4.0 x8.

Physical dimensions: the AMD card is 168 mm long, 69 mm high, and 20 mm wide. The NVIDIA card is 163 mm long and 69 mm high, with no width listed.

Release dates differ: the AMD card was released on 2025-08-02, while the NVIDIA card was released on 2024-04-15. The AMD predecessor is Radeon Pro Vega with no successor listed. The NVIDIA predecessor is GeForce 30 with successor GeForce 50.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 shows advantages in raw compute specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 7.885 TFLOPS is nearly three times the NVIDIA card's 2.706 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth of 172.8 GB/s is 80% higher than the NVIDIA card's 96.00 GB/s. The 8 GB memory capacity doubles the NVIDIA card's 4 GB, and the 128 bit bus doubles the 64 bit bus. Pixel rate and texture rate are both more than double the NVIDIA card's figures. The 28 ray tracing cores versus 6 suggest a stronger ray tracing workload capability on paper.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 wins on clock speeds. Its base clock of 1417 MHz is over four times the AMD card's 330 MHz, and its boost clock of 1762 MHz exceeds the AMD boost of 1100 MHz. The NVIDIA card includes 24 tensor cores, a feature absent from the AMD specification. The NVIDIA card has a measurable benchmark result, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, placing it in the 18th percentile. The AMD card has no recorded benchmark data.

The AMD card uses DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which support newer display standards than the mini-DisplayPort 1.4a on the NVIDIA card. The AMD card also draws 5 W more power at 55 W versus 50 W, though both remain low-power single-slot designs without external power connectors.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear specification gap in favor of the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 on nearly every compute and memory metric. The AMD card delivers 7.885 TFLOPS FP32 against 2.706 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card, has 8 GB memory against 4 GB, and offers 172.8 GB/s bandwidth against 96.00 GB/s. The AMD card also has more shading units (1792 versus 768), more texture mapping units (112 versus 24), more raster operation pipelines (64 versus 16), and more ray tracing cores (28 versus 6).

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 counters with substantially higher clock speeds: 1417 MHz base and 1762 MHz boost versus 330 MHz base and 1100 MHz boost. It also includes 24 tensor cores, which the AMD card does not list. The NVIDIA card has an actual benchmark score of 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while the AMD card has no recorded benchmark data at all.

The database shows the RTX 4010 performing within 1% of several nearby rivals, including the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, and Quadro P600. This places it in the 18th percentile overall. The AMD card's 50th percentile rank suggests a mid-pack position, but without benchmark scores, this rank cannot be verified against measured performance.

For users prioritizing compute throughput, memory capacity, bandwidth, and newer display outputs, the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 holds the specification advantage. For users prioritizing a measured benchmark result, tensor core availability, and higher clock speeds, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has the documented performance data. The absence of shared benchmark tests means the database cannot confirm whether the AMD card's specification advantages translate into real-world wins over the NVIDIA card in any specific workload.