AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the Intel Arc A570M target different segments, and the recorded data confirms this split. The Radeon PRO W7400 is a desktop workstation card with a 55 W TDP, while the Arc A570M is a mobile part with a 75 W TDP. Benchmark data for the Intel GPU places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with an average OpenCL score of 58239, while the AMD card has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Intel part sits within 0.7% of several high-end rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which shows a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which trails by 0.3%. The Radeon PRO W7400, by contrast, has a 50th percentile ranking, indicating a mid-pack position based on its recorded specifications rather than direct measurements.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A570M wins in raw compute throughput in the recorded OpenCL benchmark. Its score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, a strong result that puts it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM. This is a mobile GPU that outperforms a desktop flagship in the same database, which is a significant finding. The Radeon PRO W7400 has no benchmark entries, so its standing rests entirely on its architectural specifications and professional feature set.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins in power efficiency and workstation-oriented design. Its 55 W TDP is 20 W lower than the Intel part's 75 W TDP, and it requires only a 250 W suggested power supply. The card is a single-slot design with no power connectors, measuring 168 mm in length, which suits compact professional workstations. The Arc A570M is an IGP (integrated GPU) for portable devices, with no standalone dimensions or power connector data recorded.

The Radeon PRO W7400 also wins on raw FP32 throughput, delivering 7.885 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS for the Intel part. This is a 48% advantage in single-precision compute. However, the Intel GPU counters with FP16 performance of 10.65 TFLOPS, achieved through a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD card delivers 7.885 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part leads by 35% in half-precision workloads.

The AMD card wins on ray tracing core count with 28 RT cores versus 16 for Intel, a 75% advantage. It also leads in transistor density with 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter versus 42.8 million for Intel, despite the Intel chip having a larger die at 269 mm² versus 204 mm². The AMD GPU uses fewer transistors overall (13,300 million versus 11,500 million) but packs them more densely on a smaller die.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel Arc A570M uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip and belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) generation. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, which is a point of similarity.

The AMD chip has a die size of 204 mm² and contains 13,300 million transistors, resulting in a density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip is larger at 269 mm² but contains fewer transistors at 11,500 million, yielding a lower density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The Radeon PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The Arc A570M has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Intel GPU has 14% more shading units and TMUs, while both have the same ROP count.

Ray tracing cores differ significantly: the AMD card has 28 RT cores, while the Intel part has 16, a 75% advantage for AMD. Neither GPU has tensor cores recorded. The AMD card's clock behavior is notable: a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, whereas the Intel GPU runs at 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost. The Intel GPU's higher clocks contribute to its pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s, both exceeding the AMD card's 70.40 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s.

Memory subsystems are similar in capacity and bus width. Both GPUs have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The AMD card's memory runs at 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective speed, yielding 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card's memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, yielding 224.0 GB/s, a 30% bandwidth advantage. Both use a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Display outputs differ by design intent. The AMD card provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, making it suitable for multi-monitor professional setups. The Intel part's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its mobile IGP nature. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card is a single-slot desktop card measuring 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm, while the Intel GPU has no recorded dimensions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a recorded OpenCL score of 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A570M scores 0.3% below the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (which averages 58392), 0.3% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085), 0.5% below the NVIDIA P102-100 (58528), and 0.7% below the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657).

Q: Which GPU provides higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc A570M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS. The AMD card holds a 48% advantage in single-precision workloads.

Q: Which GPU provides higher FP16 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc A570M delivers 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance using a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part leads by 35% in half-precision workloads.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a 55 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 250 W, with no power connectors required. The Intel Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP, with no suggested PSU or power connector data recorded.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, compared to 172.8 GB/s for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the Intel card's memory runs at 14 Gbps effective speed versus 10.8 Gbps for the AMD card.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, while the Intel Arc A570M uses Xe-HPG with the DG2-256 chip. Transistor counts differ: AMD has 13,300 million transistors, Intel has 11,500 million. Die sizes differ substantially: AMD's is 204 mm², Intel's is 269 mm². Transistor density favors AMD at 65.2M per mm² versus 42.8M per mm² for Intel.

Clock speeds show the Intel GPU running faster. Intel's base clock is 900 MHz and boost is 1300 MHz, while AMD's base is 330 MHz and boost is 1100 MHz. Memory clocks also favor Intel: 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective versus AMD's 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective. Memory bandwidth follows, with Intel at 224.0 GB/s and AMD at 172.8 GB/s.

Compute unit counts favor Intel in shading units (2048 versus 1792) and TMUs (128 versus 112), while both have 64 ROPs. Ray tracing cores favor AMD with 28 versus 16. Pixel rate favors Intel at 83.20 GPixel/s versus 70.40 GPixel/s, and texture rate favors Intel at 166.4 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance favors AMD at 7.885 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance favors Intel at 10.65 TFLOPS versus 7.885 TFLOPS, with the ratio differing (2:1 for Intel, 1:1 for AMD).

Power and physical design differ by platform. AMD has a 55 W TDP, single-slot width, no power connectors, a 250 W suggested PSU, and dimensions of 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm. Intel has a 75 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connector data, no suggested PSU, and no recorded dimensions. Display outputs differ: AMD provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while Intel's outputs are portable device dependent. Release dates also differ: AMD launched on 2025-08-02, Intel on 2023-07-31.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs, and the AMD card has no individual benchmark scores. The only recorded performance measurement is the Intel Arc A570M's OpenCL score of 58239. This score places the Intel GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, a high ranking that suggests strong general compute performance. The nearest rivals confirm this positioning: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.3% lower), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.7% higher). The Intel part is essentially level with these four GPUs, all within a 1% band.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400's 50th percentile ranking, based on its specifications, places it in the middle of the database's GPU distribution. Without recorded benchmark scores, direct comparison relies on theoretical specifications. The AMD card leads in FP32 compute with 7.885 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS, a 48% gap. This advantage is partially offset by the Intel card's FP16 performance, which reaches 10.65 TFLOPS versus 7.885 TFLOPS, a 35% lead. The Intel GPU also leads in memory bandwidth (224.0 GB/s versus 172.8 GB/s, a 30% advantage) and texture rate (166.4 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s, a 35% advantage).

The AMD GPU counters with a 75% advantage in ray tracing cores (28 versus 16) and a lower power draw (55 W versus 75 W). Its pixel rate is lower at 70.40 GPixel/s versus 83.20 GPixel/s, a 15% deficit. The Intel GPU's higher shading unit count (2048 versus 1792, a 14% advantage) and higher boost clock (1300 MHz versus 1100 MHz, an 18% advantage) contribute to its throughput advantages. The AMD GPU's higher transistor density (65.2M per mm² versus 42.8M per mm²) indicates a more compact design, but the Intel GPU uses its larger die to achieve higher absolute throughput in several categories.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of roles. The Intel Arc A570M is the stronger choice for general compute and raw throughput, based on its recorded OpenCL score of 58239 and its 88th percentile ranking. It sits within 0.7% of four high-end rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which demonstrates that this mobile GPU delivers desktop-class compute performance. Its advantages in FP16 throughput (10.65 TFLOPS), memory bandwidth (224.0 GB/s), and texture rate (166.4 GTexel/s) make it suitable for workloads that leverage these capabilities.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is the stronger choice for professional desktop workstations that prioritize power efficiency and display connectivity. Its 55 W TDP, single-slot design, and lack of power connectors make it easy to integrate into compact systems, and its 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support multi-monitor setups. Its FP32 performance of 7.885 TFLOPS exceeds the Intel part's 5.325 TFLOPS, which matters for single-precision compute tasks. The 28 ray tracing cores versus 16 for Intel also give it an advantage in ray-traced workloads.

The AMD card's 50th percentile ranking, absent benchmark scores, indicates a mid-pack position in the database. The Intel card's 88th percentile ranking and measured score provide concrete evidence of high performance. Users seeking a mobile GPU with proven compute performance should select the Intel Arc A570M. Users seeking a low-power desktop workstation card with extensive display outputs and stronger FP32 and ray tracing specifications should select the AMD Radeon PRO W7400. The two GPUs do not directly compete in form factor or intended platform, and the data reflects these different design goals.