AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE Comparison

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE are two very different GPUs from the same manufacturer, separated by six years of architecture evolution. The Pro Vega 64X is an end-of-life, integrated graphics solution built for Apple Mac systems, while the RX 9070 GRE is an active, dual-slot add-in card from the Radeon RX 9000 series. The database contains benchmark results that show a significant performance gap, but the story is more nuanced than a simple win-loss record. The Pro Vega 64X holds a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs, yet the RX 9070 GRE delivers a far higher raw score in the shared compute test. This raises questions about how architectural changes, memory design, and feature sets influence real-world outcomes.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X has an average benchmark score of 80,959, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has an average score of 57,367. The Pro Vega 64X also sits at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, compared to the 87th percentile for the RX 9070 GRE.

Q: What is the only head-to-head benchmark result listed?

A: The only direct comparison is Geekbench OpenCL. The RX 9070 GRE scores 109,309, and the Pro Vega 64X scores 78,467. The RX 9070 GRE wins this test, with the Pro Vega 64X trailing by 28.2 percent.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare for each card?

A: For the Pro Vega 64X, the AMD Radeon PRO W6600 is its closest rival, with an average score of 81,995, which is 1.3 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 scores 79,842, 1.4 percent lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants are 1.7 and 2.0 percent lower. For the RX 9070 GRE, the Intel Arc A580 has an average score of 57,756, which is 0.7 percent higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 1.2 percent higher, and the Intel Arc A570M is 1.5 percent higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 1.8 percent higher.

Q: What are the memory capacities and types for these two cards?

A: The Pro Vega 64X has 16 GB of HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which card supports hardware ray tracing?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has 48 ray tracing cores. The Pro Vega 64X has no ray tracing cores listed in the database.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the RX 9070 GRE?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The Pro Vega 64X has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent separate eras of AMD design. The Pro Vega 64X uses the Vega 10 chip built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 495 mm² and 12,500 million transistors. The RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 357 mm² and 53,900 million transistors. The transistor density tells a compelling story: the older chip packs 25.3 million transistors per square millimeter, while the newer one achieves 151.0 million, a dramatic increase in integration efficiency.

The architecture itself changed fundamentally. The Pro Vega 64X relies on GCN 5.0, while the RX 9070 GRE uses RDNA 4.0. This shift affects how the GPU executes work. GCN was designed for compute-heavy tasks, with a large number of shading units arranged in a wide configuration. The RX 9070 GRE uses a more streamlined design focused on gaming efficiency and modern features. The shading unit counts reflect this: the Pro Vega 64X has 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The RX 9070 GRE has fewer shading units at 3,072, fewer texture units at 192, but more ROPs at 96.

Clock speeds also diverge significantly. The Pro Vega 64X has a base clock of 1250 MHz and a boost clock of 1468 MHz. The RX 9070 GRE starts at 1420 MHz base, boosts to 2790 MHz, and has a game clock of 2220 MHz. The higher clocks on the RX 9070 GRE, combined with the RDNA architecture, produce a much higher peak throughput. The floating-point performance numbers show this clearly: the Pro Vega 64X delivers 12.03 TFLOPS for FP32, while the RX 9070 GRE reaches 34.28 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance also differs, with the Pro Vega 64X offering 24.05 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 9070 GRE provides 34.28 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Memory technology is another major divider. The Pro Vega 64X uses HBM2 on a 2048-bit interface, which gives it a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The RX 9070 GRE uses GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 432.0 GB/s. Despite the narrower bus, the newer card still provides substantial bandwidth, though slightly less than the older HBM2 solution. The memory clock also differs: the Pro Vega 64X runs at 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective), while the RX 9070 GRE runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Feature support shows a generational gap. The RX 9070 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Pro Vega 64X supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9070 GRE also includes 48 ray tracing cores, which the Pro Vega 64X lacks entirely. The bus interface differs as well: the Pro Vega 64X uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the RX 9070 GRE uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records one direct comparison between these two cards: Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the RX 9070 GRE scores 109,309, while the Pro Vega 64X scores 78,467. The difference is 28.2 percent in favor of the RX 9070 GRE. This is a decisive margin, indicating that the newer architecture and higher clocks translate into substantial compute performance gains. The OpenCL test exercises general-purpose compute workloads, which is relevant for both cards given their respective target markets.

The Pro Vega 64X does have its own benchmark results outside the head-to-head. Its Geekbench Metal score is 83,450, which is higher than its OpenCL score. This suggests the card performs well in Apple-centric graphics workloads, consistent with its role as an integrated GPU in Mac systems. The RX 9070 GRE also has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,424, which reflects its gaming-oriented capabilities.

Looking at the average benchmark scores provides additional context. The Pro Vega 64X averages 80,959 across all recorded tests, which places it at the 92nd percentile. The RX 9070 GRE averages 57,367, placing it at the 87th percentile. This is an interesting inversion: the RX 9070 GRE wins the OpenCL test by a wide margin, yet its overall average is lower. The reason lies in the benchmark mix. The RX 9070 GRE has a 3DMark result that likely drags its average down, while the Pro Vega 64X has two strong compute scores. The percentile ranking accounts for all GPUs in the database, and the Pro Vega 64X's compute-heavy profile gives it a higher standing.

The nearest rival data reinforces this picture. The Pro Vega 64X sits very close to the AMD Radeon PRO W6600, which scores 81,995, a 1.3 percent difference. It also edges out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, which scores 79,842, a 1.4 percent difference. These are tight margins, showing that the Pro Vega 64X remains competitive with much newer professional cards in compute tasks. The RX 9070 GRE, by contrast, is clustered with mid-range cards like the Intel Arc A580 and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, with all deltas under 2 percent. Its average score is not far from the RX 6950 XT, which is 1.8 percent higher.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every specification category. The process node is a major gap: 14 nm for the Pro Vega 64X versus 4 nm for the RX 9070 GRE. The foundry also changed from GlobalFoundries to TSMC. Transistor counts are vastly different, with the RX 9070 GRE having 53,900 million compared to 12,500 million, despite a smaller die size of 357 mm² versus 495 mm².

Memory configuration differs in capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The Pro Vega 64X has 16 GB of HBM2 with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The bus width is 2048 bits versus 192 bits. Memory clocks are 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Compute resources differ: shading units are 4,096 versus 3,072, TMUs are 256 versus 192, and ROPs are 64 versus 96. The RX 9070 GRE adds 48 ray tracing cores, which the Pro Vega 64X does not have. Pixel and texture rates reflect the architectural differences. The Pro Vega 64X has a pixel rate of 93.95 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 375.8 GTexel/s. The RX 9070 GRE has a pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s.

Power and physical design also differ. The Pro Vega 64X has a TDP of 250 W, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP), has no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W, is dual-slot, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The display outputs are dependent on the portable device for the Pro Vega 64X, while the RX 9070 GRE offers one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs.

The API support differs in DirectX and Vulkan versions. The Pro Vega 64X supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3. The RX 9070 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4. Production status and release dates differ: the Pro Vega 64X was released on March 18, 2019, and is end-of-life, while the RX 9070 GRE was released on May 7, 2025, and is active. The RX 9070 GRE has a predecessor listed as Navi III, and its launch MSRP is 549 USD.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9070 GRE wins decisively in raw compute performance. Its OpenCL score of 109,309 is 28.2 percent higher than the Pro Vega 64X's 78,467. This makes it the better choice for any workload that relies on OpenCL compute, such as scientific simulations, video encoding, or machine learning inference. The higher FP32 throughput of 34.28 TFLOPS versus 12.03 TFLOPS indicates a substantial advantage in general-purpose compute tasks. The RX 9070 GRE also wins in gaming features, thanks to its ray tracing cores, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and higher pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s versus 93.95 GPixel/s.

The Pro Vega 64X wins in specific areas that matter for its intended market. Its 16 GB of HBM2 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is superior to the RX 9070 GRE's 12 GB GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s. For workloads that require large memory capacity, such as rendering high-resolution scenes or training large neural networks, the Pro Vega 64X has an advantage. Its support for Metal, evidenced by a Geekbench Metal score of 83,450, makes it a stronger option for Apple ecosystem applications. The higher percentile ranking of 92 versus 87 also indicates that, across a broad range of GPU benchmarks, the Pro Vega 64X performs better relative to the entire GPU landscape.

The Pro Vega 64X also has a lower power draw in terms of TDP, at 250 W versus 220 W for the RX 9070 GRE. While the difference is modest, the Pro Vega 64X requires no external power connectors, as it is an integrated solution. This makes it suitable for compact, portable systems where power delivery is limited. The RX 9070 GRE requires a 550 W PSU and dual 8-pin connectors, which limits its use to desktop builds with adequate power delivery.

The Verdict

The data suggests two distinct use cases. For a user building a modern desktop PC focused on gaming or general compute, the RX 9070 GRE is the clear choice. Its OpenCL performance is 28.2 percent higher than the Pro Vega 64X, and it brings modern features like ray tracing, DirectX 12 Ultimate, and a PCIe 5.0 interface. The higher boost clock of 2790 MHz and the game clock of 2220 MHz indicate strong real-world performance in graphics-intensive tasks. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient for most gaming scenarios, and the dual-slot design with standard connectors makes installation straightforward.

For a user working within the Apple Mac ecosystem, particularly on a portable device, the Pro Vega 64X is the only option. It is an integrated GPU with no separate power connectors, and its display outputs are dependent on the host device. The 16 GB of HBM2 memory is a notable advantage for memory-hungry professional applications, and its Metal benchmark score of 83,450 shows that it is optimized for Apple's graphics API. The 92nd percentile ranking also indicates that it holds up well against the broader GPU market, despite being end-of-life.

The benchmark averages tell a nuanced story. The Pro Vega 64X has a higher average score of 80,959 and a higher percentile ranking, yet it loses the direct OpenCL comparison by a large margin. This suggests that the Pro Vega 64X's strength lies in its consistency across diverse workloads, while the RX 9070 GRE excels in specific compute tasks but may lag in others, as shown by its lower average score of 57,367. Users should weigh the specific applications they intend to run. If OpenCL performance is the priority, the RX 9070 GRE is superior. If broad compute capability and memory capacity matter more, the Pro Vega 64X remains competitive, especially in its native ecosystem.