AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA Rubin GPU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no shared benchmark submissions for the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and NVIDIA Rubin GPU. The Radeon PRO V710 has recorded scores in two tests: 853 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 116,460 points in Geekbench OpenCL. The Rubin GPU has no benchmark entries, so direct numerical comparison is impossible at this time.

However, the Radeon PRO V710's average benchmark score of 58,657 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 (average score 58,528, delta 0.2%), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (average score 58,392, delta 0.5%), the Intel Arc A570M (average score 58,239, delta 0.7%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (average score 58,085, delta 1.0%). These small deltas indicate the V710 sits in a tightly clustered performance band, with no rival more than 1% away in either direction.

The Rubin GPU's percentile ranking of 50 with an average score of 0 reflects the absence of recorded measurements, not an indication of real-world capability. The data shows that until benchmark submissions populate for the Rubin part, head-to-head analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than empirical scores.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The NVIDIA Rubin GPU delivers 130.0 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS. The Rubin part is approximately 4.7 times higher in this metric.

Q: What are the memory capacities of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU has 288 GB of HBM4 memory on a 16,384-bit bus with 22.1 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12?

A: No. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan as N/A, indicating no consumer graphics API support in the recorded data.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count?

A: The NVIDIA Rubin GPU contains 336,000 million transistors, versus 28,100 million for the AMD Radeon PRO V710. The Rubin GPU also uses a larger die at 1456 mm² compared to 346 mm² for the V710.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a single 8-pin connector. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU has a TDP of 2300 W with a suggested PSU of 2700 W and uses an SXM module form factor.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the NVIDIA Rubin GPU?

A: The database lists no benchmarks for the Rubin GPU. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in the category of measured, verified performance. Its two benchmark scores provide concrete reference points: 853 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 116,460 in Geekbench OpenCL. The 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database confirms it outperforms the majority of recorded parts. Its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score, meaning the V710 holds a slight edge over the NVIDIA P102-100, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, Intel Arc A570M, and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, though the margins are narrow enough to be considered statistically insignificant.

The NVIDIA Rubin GPU wins in raw specification superiority across nearly every computed metric. Its FP32 throughput of 130.0 TFLOPS dwarfs the V710's 27.65 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth of 22.1 TB/s versus 504.0 GB/s represents a 44-fold advantage. The 288 GB memory capacity is over ten times the V710's 28 GB. The Rubin GPU also uses a newer 3 nm process node versus the V710's 5 nm node, and it supports PCIe 6.0 x16 compared to the V710's PCIe 4.0 x16.

For practical deployment, the V710 wins on power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 158 W TDP with a 450 W suggested PSU and single-slot design contrasts sharply with the Rubin GPU's 2300 W TDP, 2700 W suggested PSU, and SXM module form factor. The V710 is a self-contained card requiring one 8-pin connector, while the Rubin GPU is designed for server integration with no standard power connector listed.

The V710 also wins on software compatibility for conventional graphics workloads. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, enabling standard rendering pipelines. The Rubin GPU lists all three APIs as N/A, suggesting it is not intended for traditional graphics applications.

Neither part has display outputs, so both are compute or server oriented. The V710's release date of 2024-10-02 makes it an available product, while the Rubin GPU's release date of 2025-12-31 places it in a future timeframe. The Rubin GPU's production status is listed as Active, whereas the V710's production status is not specified.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every specification category. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Wheat Nas. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU uses the GR100 chip with Rubin architecture and no codename listed. The V710 belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation, while the Rubin GPU belongs to the Server Rubin (Rxx) generation.

Process nodes differ: the V710 is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm node, while the Rubin GPU uses TSMC's 3 nm node. Transistor counts are 28,100 million for the V710 and 336,000 million for the Rubin GPU. Die sizes are 346 mm² versus 1456 mm², resulting in transistor densities of 81.2M per mm² for the V710 and 230.8M per mm² for the Rubin GPU.

Clock speeds show a split. The V710 has a higher base clock of 1900 MHz versus 700 MHz for the Rubin GPU. Boost clocks are closer: 2000 MHz for the V710 and 2267 MHz for the Rubin GPU. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the V710 and 2695 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) for the Rubin GPU, though the effective rates do not directly compare due to different memory types.

Memory configurations are vastly different. The V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Rubin GPU uses 288 GB of HBM4 on a 16,384-bit bus with 22.1 TB/s bandwidth.

Compute unit counts differ: the V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The Rubin GPU has 28,672 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, and only 24 raster output units. The V710 has 54 ray tracing cores, while the Rubin GPU lists no dedicated RT cores. The Rubin GPU has 896 tensor cores, while the V710 has none listed.

Pixel rates are 192.0 GPixel/s for the V710 and 54.41 GPixel/s for the Rubin GPU. Texture rates are 432.0 GTexel/s for the V710 and 2,031.2 GTexel/s for the Rubin GPU. FP32 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS versus 130.0 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) for the V710 and 260.0 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Rubin GPU.

Power and physical specifications diverge completely. The V710 has a 158 W TDP, single-slot width, 1x 8-pin power connector, and 450 W suggested PSU. The Rubin GPU has a 2300 W TDP, SXM Module slot width, no power connector listed, and 2700 W suggested PSU. Bus interfaces are PCIe 4.0 x16 for the V710 and PCIe 6.0 x16 for the Rubin GPU. Both have no display outputs.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 implements RDNA 3.0 architecture, AMD's third-generation Radeon DNA design. This architecture uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The RDNA 3.0 design employs a unified shader architecture with 3,456 shading units organized into compute units that handle both vertex and pixel processing. The V710 includes 54 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported workloads. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

The NVIDIA Rubin GPU uses the Rubin architecture, which represents NVIDIA's next-generation server compute platform. Fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm node, the GR100 chip contains 336,000 million transistors across a massive 1456 mm² die. The architecture is built around 28,672 shading units and 896 tensor cores, emphasizing parallel compute throughput over traditional graphics capabilities. The Rubin architecture does not list dedicated ray tracing cores in the recorded data, and it declares N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan support, indicating a compute-first design rather than a graphics-oriented one.

The transistor density difference is notable: the Rubin GPU achieves 230.8M transistors per mm² versus 81.2M for the V710. This reflects both the smaller 3 nm process node and the architectural density of the GR100 design. The Rubin GPU's FP16 performance of 260.0 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32 indicates optimized tensor operations, whereas the V710's FP16 runs at 1:1 with FP32, showing no specialized half-precision acceleration.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The V710 uses conventional GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, a configuration typical of mid-range graphics cards. The Rubin GPU uses HBM4 on a 16,384-bit bus, a high-bandwidth memory stack designed for data-intensive server workloads. This explains the 22.1 TB/s bandwidth figure, which is orders of magnitude higher than the V710's 504.0 GB/s.

The Rubin GPU's 24 raster output units are extremely low for its shading unit count, reinforcing that it is not designed for pixel-heavy rendering. Its 896 texture mapping units provide substantial texture throughput of 2,031.2 GTexel/s, more than four times the V710's 432.0 GTexel/s. The V710's higher pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 54.41 GPixel/s for the Rubin GPU shows the V710 retains traditional graphics pipeline capabilities.

Power architecture reflects the different deployment targets. The V710's 158 W TDP and single-slot design suit standard PCIe slots in workstations. The Rubin GPU's 2300 W TDP and SXM module form factor require dedicated server infrastructure with liquid cooling or specialized power delivery. The PCIe 6.0 x16 interface on the Rubin GPU provides double the bandwidth of the V710's PCIe 4.0 x16, though no benchmark data currently exists to quantify the practical impact.