AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs NVIDIA Rubin GPU Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB and the NVIDIA Rubin GPU serve entirely different segments of the graphics hardware landscape, and the benchmark data reflects this separation clearly. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores, delivering a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 1995 points. This places it at the 13th percentile among all GPUs in the database, a position that indicates entry-level to mid-range performance territory. The Rubin GPU, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores at all, with an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty benchmark array. Its percentile ranking of 50 is a default placeholder rather than a measured result, as the database contains no test data for this part.

The architectural purpose of each product dictates where each one wins. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is a client-side graphics card with a full display output suite, including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a connections. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it suitable for conventional gaming and desktop rendering workloads. The Rubin GPU, on the other hand, has no display outputs and lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan support as N/A. It is a server-class compute module in an SXM form factor, designed for data center acceleration rather than visual output. In terms of raw compute throughput, the Rubin GPU delivers 130.0 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus 11.29 TFLOPS for the RX 6750 GRE, a roughly 11.5x advantage. Texture rate follows a similar pattern, with the Rubin GPU achieving 2,031.2 GTexel/s compared to 352.8 GTexel/s for the AMD card.

The wins are therefore clear: the RX 6750 GRE wins in any scenario requiring a display, consumer API support, or a conventional graphics card footprint. The Rubin GPU wins decisively in raw computational throughput, memory bandwidth, and sheer scale, provided the workload does not require graphics output. The RX 6750 GRE maintains an active production status with a measured benchmark score, while the Rubin GPU also lists as active but with zero recorded performance data, so any comparison of measured wins must default to the AMD part.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB uses the Navi 22 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU uses the GR100 chip on the Rubin architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process, also at TSMC. The transistor counts differ by an order of magnitude: the RX 6750 GRE contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, while the Rubin GPU packs 336,000 million transistors onto a 1456 mm² die. Transistor density scales accordingly, with the Rubin GPU at 230.8M transistors per mm² versus 51.3M per mm² for the AMD part.

Memory architecture presents a stark contrast. The RX 6750 GRE has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, yielding 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Rubin GPU features 288 GB of HBM4 memory on a 16384-bit bus, delivering 22.1 TB/s of bandwidth, roughly 69x higher. The clock behavior differs as well: the AMD card runs at a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2189 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. The Rubin GPU has a much lower base clock of 700 MHz but boosts to 2267 MHz, nearly matching the AMD boost clock despite the massive difference in scale.

The compute unit configurations diverge sharply. The RX 6750 GRE has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 64 raster output pipelines, and 36 ray tracing cores. The Rubin GPU has 28672 shading units, 896 TMUs, but only 24 ROPs, along with 896 tensor cores. The ROP count is notably low for the Rubin GPU, which reflects its server-oriented design: pixel rate is 54.41 GPixel/s for the Rubin GPU versus 156.8 GPixel/s for the RX 6750 GRE, meaning the AMD card is nearly 3x faster at rasterization output. The texture rate reverses this, with the Rubin GPU at 2,031.2 GTexel/s versus 352.8 GTexel/s for the AMD part.

Power and physical specifications also vary. The RX 6750 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, a dual-slot design, and a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Rubin GPU draws 2300 W, uses an SXM module form factor, and suggests a 2700 W power supply. The AMD card measures 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Rubin GPU has no recorded dimensions. The bus interface differs as well: PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RX 6750 GRE versus PCIe 6.0 x16 for the Rubin GPU. The RX 6750 GRE has a release date of 2023-10-16, while the Rubin GPU is dated 2025-12-31. The AMD part lists its predecessor as Navi and successor as Navi III; the Rubin GPU lists its predecessor as Server Blackwell with no successor recorded.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a straightforward selection based on workload requirements. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has an actual benchmark score of 1995 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 13th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GRID K1 with an average score of 1976 (1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 at 1973 (1.1% delta), the Intel UHD Graphics 770 at 2027 (-1.6% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M at 2029 (-1.7% delta). This clustering shows the RX 6750 GRE sits in a narrow performance band, slightly ahead of the GRID K1 and GTX 470 but slightly behind the Intel integrated solution and the GTX 660M in this specific test.

The NVIDIA Rubin GPU has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and no measured performance data. It cannot be compared on equal footing in any benchmark sense. Its 50th percentile ranking is unsubstantiated by any recorded test. For anyone needing a graphics card with display outputs, consumer API support, and a measured performance profile, the RX 6750 GRE is the only viable choice between these two. For anyone needing massive compute throughput in a server context, the Rubin GPU's 130.0 TFLOPS FP32, 22.1 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 288 GB of HBM4 memory indicate extreme capability, but the lack of recorded benchmarks means the database cannot validate its real-world performance.

The data shows no head-to-head benchmark results and zero wins for either part in direct competition. The verdict must rest on the available measurements: the RX 6750 GRE is a functional, tested graphics card for client systems, while the Rubin GPU is a compute-oriented server module with no display support and no test data. The choice depends entirely on whether the use case requires graphics output or pure computational scale.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA Rubin GPU delivers 130.0 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB provides 11.29 TFLOPS. The Rubin GPU is approximately 11.5x higher in this metric.

Q: Does the NVIDIA Rubin GPU support DirectX or Vulkan?

A: No. The database lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan support as N/A for the Rubin GPU. The AMD RX 6750 GRE 10 GB supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The AMD RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU has 22.1 TB/s of bandwidth from 288 GB of HBM4 on a 16384-bit bus, which is roughly 69x higher.

Q: Which GPU has display outputs?

A: Only the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has display outputs, with 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU lists no outputs.

Q: What is the measured benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The AMD RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1995. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How do the transistor counts compare?

A: The AMD RX 6750 GRE 10 GB contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die using a 7 nm process. The NVIDIA Rubin GPU contains 336,000 million transistors on a 1456 mm² die using a 3 nm process.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no recorded head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB and the NVIDIA Rubin GPU in the database. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and both winsA and winsB are zero. This means no direct comparison can be made from measured data. However, the individual specifications and the single benchmark score for the AMD part allow for an indirect analysis of where each GPU would dominate.

The largest advantage for the AMD card is in pixel rate. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB achieves 156.8 GPixel/s, while the Rubin GPU manages 54.41 GPixel/s. This represents a 2.9x advantage for the AMD part, a notable margin given the Rubin GPU's far larger transistor count and die size. The explanation lies in the ROP counts: the AMD card has 64 ROPs versus just 24 for the Rubin GPU. For any workload that requires rasterization output, such as traditional game rendering to a display, the RX 6750 GRE is substantially faster despite its lower overall compute capability.

The Rubin GPU's largest advantages appear in memory bandwidth and texture throughput. The 22.1 TB/s bandwidth of the Rubin GPU versus 320.0 GB/s for the AMD part is a 69x difference, the largest single gap in the specifications. Texture rate favors the Rubin GPU at 2,031.2 GTexel/s versus 352.8 GTexel/s, a 5.8x advantage. The FP32 compute gap of 130.0 TFLOPS versus 11.29 TFLOPS is an 11.5x difference, and FP16 performance follows the same ratio at 260.0 TFLOPS versus 22.58 TFLOPS. The Rubin GPU also has 28672 shading units versus 2304 for the AMD card, an 12.4x difference, and 896 tensor cores that the AMD part lacks entirely.

Clock speeds tell a nuanced story. The AMD card has a higher base clock at 1941 MHz versus 700 MHz for the Rubin GPU, a 2.8x difference. The boost clocks are closer: 2450 MHz for the AMD card versus 2267 MHz for the Rubin GPU, a 1.08x advantage for the AMD part. The game clock of 2189 MHz for the RX 6750 GRE has no equivalent on the Rubin GPU, as that field is null. The memory clocks also differ, with the AMD card at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and the Rubin GPU at 2695 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective), though the vastly different memory types and bus widths make direct comparison less meaningful.

The nearest rival data for the RX 6750 GRE provides context for its performance tier. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 scores 2027, which is 1.6% higher than the AMD card, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M scores 2029, or 1.7% higher. The AMD card sits ahead of the NVIDIA GRID K1 by 1% (1976 points) and the GeForce GTX 470 by 1.1% (1973 points). This places the RX 6750 GRE in a tight competitive cluster where a few percent separates all four rivals. The Rubin GPU has no such rival data, reinforcing its status as an untested, compute-focused part outside the conventional graphics comparison framework.

The power requirements reflect the performance disparity. The RX 6750 GRE draws 170 W with a suggested 450 W PSU, while the Rubin GPU draws 2300 W with a suggested 2700 W PSU. The form factors are incompatible: the AMD card is a dual-slot PCIe card measuring 267 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm, while the Rubin GPU is an SXM module with no recorded dimensions. The bus interfaces differ as well, with PCIe 4.0 x16 for the AMD part and PCIe 6.0 x16 for the NVIDIA part. These physical differences reinforce that the two products are not substitutes for each other in any practical system configuration.