AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a single shared benchmark between the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile and the AMD Radeon PRO V710: Geekbench OpenCL. This test measures raw compute throughput across a wide range of workloads, and the AMD part takes a clear lead. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116,460, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile scores 105,307. That is a 9.6% advantage for the AMD card, a meaningful margin in compute-oriented tasks. The NVIDIA part does not win any head-to-head test in the database; the AMD part wins the only available comparison.

The average benchmark score tells a different story, but it must be interpreted carefully. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has an average score of 91,134, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average of 58,657. This discrepancy is due to the fact that the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has one additional benchmark result in the database, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 853. That DX12 result, while not directly comparable to the NVIDIA part, drags down the AMD average. The NVIDIA part has only the two Geekbench results, both of which are relatively strong, so its average stays high. The database shows that when only the shared OpenCL test is considered, the AMD part is the faster compute device.

The percentile rankings reinforce the mixed picture. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile sits at the 93rd percentile against all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile. The NVIDIA part is rated higher overall in the database's ranking system, despite losing the direct OpenCL comparison. This is because the NVIDIA part's two benchmark scores are both strong, while the AMD part's DX12 result is comparatively weak, pulling its percentile down.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card provides additional context. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile's average score of 91,134 places it 0.6% below the NVIDIA RTX A4500 (91,671), 1.4% below the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 (92,466), 4.2% above the NVIDIA Quadro GP100 (87,445), and 4.6% above the AMD Radeon PRO W7600 (87,108). The AMD Radeon PRO V710's average of 58,657 places it 0.2% above the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528), 0.5% above the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392), 0.7% above the Intel Arc A570M (58,239), and 1% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085). The delta percentages on the AMD side are small, indicating a tightly clustered set of rivals, whereas the NVIDIA side shows a wider spread.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile uses the GA104 chip with the Ampere architecture, manufactured on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference is significant: 8 nm versus 5 nm. This directly impacts transistor density. The NVIDIA chip packs 17,400 million transistors into a 392 mm² die, yielding a density of 44.4 million transistors per square millimeter. The AMD chip packs 28,100 million transistors into a smaller 346 mm² die, yielding a density of 81.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The AMD part has roughly 61% more transistors in a die that is about 12% smaller, a direct result of the more advanced process node.

The compute resources are organized differently. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It also has 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It has 54 ray tracing cores but no tensor cores listed in the database. The AMD part has fewer shading units but more texture units and more ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part relies on tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads, a feature the AMD part does not list.

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile runs at a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1500 MHz. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 runs at a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The AMD part's clocks are over twice the base clock of the NVIDIA part, and its boost clock is 33% higher. This clock advantage helps explain the AMD part's higher raw throughput figures despite having fewer shading units.

The memory subsystems are similar in bandwidth but different in configuration. Both use GDDR6 memory. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB on a 224-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has a wider bus, but the AMD part has faster memory clocks and more than double the capacity. The bandwidth figures are nearly identical, with the NVIDIA part ahead by only 8 GB/s.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins the only direct benchmark comparison, the Geekbench OpenCL test, by 9.6%. This indicates that for general-purpose compute workloads that scale well with raw floating-point throughput, the AMD part is the stronger choice. Its FP32 performance is listed at 27.65 TFLOPS, compared to 17.66 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile. That is a 56.6% advantage in theoretical FP32 compute. The AMD part also has a higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 144.0 GPixel/s) and a higher texture rate (432.0 GTexel/s versus 276.0 GTexel/s). For workloads that are heavily parallel and not dependent on tensor cores, the AMD part should be expected to win.

The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile wins in the overall percentile ranking, sitting at the 93rd percentile versus the AMD part's 88th percentile. This suggests that the NVIDIA part's two benchmark scores are more consistent and place it higher in the global distribution. The NVIDIA part also has tensor cores, which the AMD part lacks. For AI inference, deep learning, or any workload that leverages tensor core acceleration, the NVIDIA part has a hardware feature that the AMD part simply does not offer. The database does not include a direct tensor core benchmark, but the architecture data shows this capability is exclusive to the NVIDIA part.

The memory capacity difference is substantial. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB. For large datasets that need to fit in GPU memory, such as certain scientific simulations, massive 3D scenes, or large language model inference, the AMD part can hold significantly more data. The NVIDIA part has a slightly higher memory bandwidth (512.0 GB/s versus 504.0 GB/s), but the capacity advantage of the AMD part is far more significant.

The power situation also differs. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has a TDP of 140 W, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W. The NVIDIA part consumes less power but also delivers less compute. The NVIDIA part is listed as using no power connectors, while the AMD part requires a single 8-pin connector and has a suggested PSU of 450 W. This makes the NVIDIA part easier to integrate into a mobile chassis, which aligns with its "Mobile" designation.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards, based on the recorded data:

• Process node: 8 nm (NVIDIA) versus 5 nm (AMD)
• Foundry: Samsung (NVIDIA) versus TSMC (AMD)
• Transistors: 17,400 million (NVIDIA) versus 28,100 million (AMD)
• Die size: 392 mm² (NVIDIA) versus 346 mm² (AMD)
• Transistor density: 44.4M / mm² (NVIDIA) versus 81.2M / mm² (AMD)
• Base clock: 930 MHz (NVIDIA) versus 1900 MHz (AMD)
• Boost clock: 1500 MHz (NVIDIA) versus 2000 MHz (AMD)
• Memory clock: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective (NVIDIA) versus 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective (AMD)
• Memory size: 16 GB (NVIDIA) versus 28 GB (AMD)
• Memory bus width: 256 bit (NVIDIA) versus 224 bit (AMD)
• Memory bandwidth: 512.0 GB/s (NVIDIA) versus 504.0 GB/s (AMD)
• Shading units: 5,888 (NVIDIA) versus 3,456 (AMD)
• TMUs: 184 (NVIDIA) versus 216 (AMD)
• RT cores: 46 (NVIDIA) versus 54 (AMD)
• Tensor cores: 184 (NVIDIA) versus not listed (AMD)
• Pixel rate: 144.0 GPixel/s (NVIDIA) versus 192.0 GPixel/s (AMD)
• Texture rate: 276.0 GTexel/s (NVIDIA) versus 432.0 GTexel/s (AMD)
• FP32: 17.66 TFLOPS (NVIDIA) versus 27.65 TFLOPS (AMD)
• FP16: 17.66 TFLOPS (NVIDIA) versus 27.65 TFLOPS (AMD)
• TDP: 140 W (NVIDIA) versus 158 W (AMD)
• Power connectors: None (NVIDIA) versus 1x 8-pin (AMD)
• Suggested PSU: not listed (NVIDIA) versus 450 W (AMD)
• Slot width: not listed (NVIDIA) versus Single-slot (AMD)
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent (NVIDIA) versus No outputs (AMD)
• Release date: 2022-03-21 (NVIDIA) versus 2024-10-02 (AMD)
• Production status: End-of-life (NVIDIA) versus not listed (AMD)
• Predecessor: Quadro Turing-M (NVIDIA) versus Radeon Pro Vega (AMD)
• Successor: Ada-MW (NVIDIA) versus not listed (AMD)
• Codename: not listed (NVIDIA) versus Wheat Nas (AMD)
• Generation: Ampere-MW (Ax000) (NVIDIA) versus Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) (AMD)

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is listed at 27.65 TFLOPS FP32, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile is listed at 17.66 TFLOPS. That is a 56.6% advantage for the AMD part.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB. The AMD part has 12 GB more capacity.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has a slight edge at 512.0 GB/s, compared to 504.0 GB/s for the AMD Radeon PRO V710. The difference is only 8 GB/s.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 have tensor cores?

A: No. The database lists 184 tensor cores for the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 does not list any tensor cores.

Q: Which card has a higher global percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile sits at the 93rd percentile against all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile.

Q: Which card is newer?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a release date of 2024-10-02, while the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile has a release date of 2022-03-21. The AMD part is newer by over two years.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split based on workload type. For raw compute performance, specifically OpenCL workloads, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the winner. Its 9.6% lead in the direct Geekbench OpenCL comparison, combined with a 56.6% advantage in theoretical FP32 throughput, makes it the stronger choice for general-purpose GPU compute. Its 28 GB of memory is also a decisive advantage for large datasets. The AMD part also has a higher pixel rate and texture rate, meaning it should handle fill-rate-bound tasks better.

The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile wins in the overall ranking system, holding the 93rd percentile versus the AMD part's 88th. Its two benchmark scores are both strong, and it has a higher average score of 91,134 versus 58,657. The NVIDIA part also has 184 tensor cores, which the AMD part lacks entirely. For AI acceleration, deep learning inference, or any workload that uses tensor core instructions, the NVIDIA part has a hardware capability that the AMD part cannot match.

The power and form factor differences also matter. The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile part with a 140 W TDP and no power connectors, designed for portable workstations. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a single-slot card with a 158 W TDP, requiring a single 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, and it has no display outputs. The AMD part is clearly a compute-oriented accelerator rather than a general-purpose graphics card.

Users who need maximum compute throughput, large memory capacity, and are working in a desktop or server environment should pick the AMD Radeon PRO V710. Users who need tensor core acceleration, a mobile form factor, and a better overall percentile ranking should pick the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile. The AMD part wins the compute benchmark, but the NVIDIA part wins on architectural features and overall ranking.