AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE Comparison
AMD Radeon PRO V710
GeForce RTX 5090 SE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE
The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE occupy different corners of the hardware landscape, and the recorded data makes that split explicit. The Radeon PRO V710 delivers a measured average benchmark score of 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with two direct benchmark results available. The GeForce RTX 5090 SE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, an average score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile. The data confirms that the Radeon PRO V710 is a shipping, tested product with verifiable performance figures, while the RTX 5090 SE is defined primarily by its specifications and its active production status. For any workload where measured performance matters, the Radeon PRO V710 is the only one of the two with concrete evidence, and its results show it competing closely with other established cards. The RTX 5090 SE offers a much larger specification sheet, but without benchmark data, its real-world behavior remains unquantified in the database.
The Verdict
The recorded data leads to a firm verdict: the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the only one of these two GPUs with any measured performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 58,657, combined with an 88th percentile ranking across all GPUs, shows a product that has been through testing and landed in the upper tier of the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE has no benchmark entries, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, meaning the database contains no evidence of its actual performance. For anyone relying on measured results, the Radeon PRO V710 is the clear choice, not because it necessarily outperforms the RTX 5090 SE, but because it is the only one with data to support a decision.
The Radeon PRO V710’s two recorded benchmarks provide additional detail. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 853, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 116,460. These are standalone numbers, but the nearest rivals in the database put them in context. The Radeon PRO V710’s average score of 58,657 is 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100’s 58,528, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT’s 58,392, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M’s 58,239, and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM’s 58,085. Those are narrow margins, all under one percentage point for three of the four rivals, and exactly one percent for the fourth. The data shows a GPU that clusters tightly with a group of established cards, none of which are runaway leaders or laggards relative to it.
For the RTX 5090 SE, the verdict is simpler: the database shows a product with no test results, and therefore no basis for a performance verdict. Its specifications are substantial, but the absence of benchmarks means it cannot be compared on the same footing. The Radeon PRO V710 wins this comparison by default, because it has evidence where the other has none.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE uses the GB202 chip, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and belongs to the GeForce 50-series generation. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process node, which is a point of similarity, but the similarities largely end there.
The transistor counts differ substantially. The Radeon PRO V710 has 28,100 million transistors on a die size of 346 mm², giving it a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The RTX 5090 SE has 92,200 million transistors on a die size of 750 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². The RTX 5090 SE packs about 3.3 times the transistor count of the Radeon PRO V710, and its density is roughly 51% higher, indicating a more tightly packed design.
The memory architectures are also distinct. The Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s. The RTX 5090 SE uses 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s. The RTX 5090 SE has a larger memory bus and higher bandwidth, but the Radeon PRO V710 has a larger memory capacity. Clock speeds differ as well: the Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, while the RTX 5090 SE has a base clock of 1740 MHz and a boost clock of 2377 MHz. The memory clocks also differ, with the Radeon PRO V710 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and the RTX 5090 SE at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).
The API support is identical for both: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the hardware features diverge. The Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 RT cores, with no tensor cores listed. The RTX 5090 SE has 14,080 shading units, 440 TMUs, 160 ROPs, 110 RT cores, and 440 tensor cores. These numbers show a much larger compute configuration on the RTX 5090 SE, but again, without benchmarks, the architectural advantage is theoretical.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs, and the RTX 5090 SE has no benchmarks at all. The only measurable data comes from the Radeon PRO V710, and it can be compared to its nearest rivals rather than to the RTX 5090 SE directly.
The Radeon PRO V710’s average benchmark score of 58,657 places it 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100’s 58,528. That is a margin of 129 points, a negligible difference that suggests the two cards perform nearly identically on average. Against the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, the Radeon PRO V710 is 0.5% ahead, with a 265-point gap between 58,657 and 58,392. The Intel Arc A570M trails by 0.7%, with the Radeon PRO V710’s score 418 points higher than 58,239. The largest gap is against the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which sits 1% behind, a 572-point difference.
The two individual benchmarks for the Radeon PRO V710 show its range. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 853, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 116,460. The Steel Nomad result is a low absolute number, typical of a demanding DX12 test, while the OpenCL score is high, reflecting a compute-oriented workload. The average of these two disparate scores, 58,657, is heavily influenced by the OpenCL figure, which is more than 136 times larger than the Steel Nomad score. This means the average is not a simple midpoint but a reflection of the OpenCL test’s dominance in the calculation.
The RTX 5090 SE cannot be placed in this comparison. With no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average score of 0, the data provides no basis for a head-to-head analysis. The Radeon PRO V710’s performance relative to its four nearest rivals is the only head-to-head information the database offers, and it shows a GPU that is marginally faster than all four, with deltas ranging from 0.2% to 1%.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher measured performance in the database?
A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657 and two recorded benchmark results. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE has no recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0, so the Radeon PRO V710 is the only one with measured performance.
Q: What is the Radeon PRO V710’s percentile ranking?
A: The Radeon PRO V710 sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The RTX 5090 SE sits in the 50th percentile, but this is based on no benchmark data.
Q: How does the Radeon PRO V710 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: It is 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA P102-100, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M, and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, based on average scores.
Q: What are the memory capacities of the two GPUs?
A: The Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory. The RTX 5090 SE has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory.
Q: Do both GPUs use the same process node?
A: Yes, both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process node, according to the database.
Q: What is the RTX 5090 SE’s launch MSRP?
A: The RTX 5090 SE has a launch MSRP of 1,499 USD. The Radeon PRO V710 has no launch MSRP listed.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data shows that the AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every category where there is evidence. It has measurable performance, with an average benchmark score of 58,657, and it wins in memory capacity with 28 GB versus the RTX 5090 SE’s 24 GB. It also has a lower power draw, with a TDP of 158 W compared to the RTX 5090 SE’s 500 W, and a smaller PSU requirement, with a suggested PSU of 450 W versus 900 W. It uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the RTX 5090 SE uses a 16-pin connector. The Radeon PRO V710 is single-slot, whereas the RTX 5090 SE is dual-slot, which matters for space-constrained systems. The Radeon PRO V710 also has a higher base clock at 1900 MHz versus 1740 MHz, and it was released on 2024-10-02, earlier than the RTX 5090 SE’s release date of 2025-12-31.
The RTX 5090 SE wins on raw specification counts. It has more shading units at 14,080 versus 3,456, more TMUs at 440 versus 216, more ROPs at 160 versus 96, more RT cores at 110 versus 54, and it has 440 tensor cores where the Radeon PRO V710 has none listed. Its boost clock is higher at 2377 MHz versus 2000 MHz. Its memory bandwidth is significantly higher at 1.34 TB/s versus 504.0 GB/s, and it uses a wider 384-bit bus versus 224-bit. Its pixel rate is 380.3 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 1,045.9 GTexel/s versus 432.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 66.94 TFLOPS versus 27.65 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is also 66.94 TFLOPS versus 27.65 TFLOPS. It has more transistors at 92,200 million versus 28,100 million, a larger die at 750 mm² versus 346 mm², and a higher transistor density at 122.9 million per mm² versus 81.2 million per mm². It also has display outputs, with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Radeon PRO V710 has no outputs. It uses PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16, and it has physical dimensions listed at 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.
The RTX 5090 SE also has a launch MSRP of 1,499 USD, while the Radeon PRO V710 has none. Its production status is Active, while the Radeon PRO V710 has no production status listed. The RTX 5090 SE has a predecessor of GeForce 40 and a successor of GeForce 60, while the Radeon PRO V710 has a predecessor of Radeon Pro Vega and no successor.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The process node and foundry are the same, with both using a 5 nm TSMC process, but the chips differ: Navi 32 for the Radeon PRO V710 and GB202 for the RTX 5090 SE. The Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the RTX 5090 SE uses Blackwell 2.0. The Radeon PRO V710 has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the RTX 5090 SE has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. Transistor density is 81.2 million per mm² versus 122.9 million per mm².
Clock speeds differ, with the Radeon PRO V710 at 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, and the RTX 5090 SE at 1740 MHz base and 2377 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the Radeon PRO V710 and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the RTX 5090 SE. Memory size is 28 GB GDDR6 versus 24 GB GDDR7. Bus width is 224-bit versus 384-bit, and bandwidth is 504.0 GB/s versus 1.34 TB/s.
Compute units differ, with the Radeon PRO V710 having 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 RT cores, versus the RTX 5090 SE’s 14,080 shading units, 440 TMUs, 160 ROPs, and 110 RT cores. The RTX 5090 SE has 440 tensor cores, while the Radeon PRO V710 has none listed. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 380.3 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s versus 1,045.9 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 are both 27.65 TFLOPS for the Radeon PRO V710, and both 66.94 TFLOPS for the RTX 5090 SE.
Power and physical specs also differ. TDP is 158 W versus 500 W. The Radeon PRO V710 is single-slot with a 1x 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5090 SE is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin connector and a 900 W suggested PSU. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are none for the Radeon PRO V710, versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX 5090 SE. The RTX 5090 SE has dimensions of 267 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width, while the Radeon PRO V710 has no dimensions listed. Release dates are 2024-10-02 for the Radeon PRO V710 and 2025-12-31 for the RTX 5090 SE. The RTX 5090 SE has a launch MSRP of 1,499 USD, while the Radeon PRO V710 has none. The RTX 5090 SE has an Active production status, while the Radeon PRO V710 has none listed.