AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data splits this comparison into two very different products. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER share a 5 nm TSMC process, but almost every other measurable specification points to different intended workloads.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the dominant performer in the single available head-to-head benchmark. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 6269.5, which is 86.4% ahead of the AMD card. The NVIDIA card also carries a much higher average benchmark score of 6270 compared to 58657 for the AMD card. However, the percentile data tells a conflicting story: the AMD card sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card sits at only the 36th percentile. This discrepancy reflects the different benchmark pools each card is measured against.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 positions itself as a compute-oriented card with no display outputs. It uses a 158 W TDP and a single-slot design. The NVIDIA card, by contrast, is a dual-slot consumer GPU with a 350 W TDP, multiple display outputs, and an active production status. Users needing display connectivity should select the NVIDIA card. Users needing a low-profile compute accelerator with 28 GB of memory should select the AMD card.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the only direct comparison in the database. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 versus 853 for the AMD card represents a decisive victory in gaming and DXR workloads. The NVIDIA card also has a significant advantage in raw compute throughput: 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 versus 27.65 TFLOPS for the AMD card. Its memory bandwidth is 896.0 GB/s, nearly double the 504.0 GB/s of the AMD card.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in memory capacity. It offers 28 GB of GDDR6 memory versus 16 GB of GDDR7 on the NVIDIA card. For workloads where memory capacity matters more than bandwidth, such as large model inference or rendering scenes that exceed 16 GB, the AMD card has a clear structural advantage. The AMD card also consumes less power: 158 W versus 350 W. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and a single-slot cooler, whereas the NVIDIA card requires a 16-pin connector and a dual-slot cooler.

The AMD card wins in transistor density: 81.2M per mm² versus 120.6M per mm² for NVIDIA. This is a peculiar metric, as the NVIDIA card packs more transistors (45,600 million versus 28,100 million) into a larger die (378 mm² versus 346 mm²). The AMD card benefits from a smaller die with fewer transistors, which likely contributes to its lower power draw.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA card uses Blackwell 2.0 with the GB203 chip and belongs to the GeForce 50-series generation.

The AMD card has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 54 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The shading unit count difference is substantial: the NVIDIA card has more than 2.5 times the shader count of the AMD card.

Clock speeds differ notably. The AMD card runs at a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The NVIDIA card runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD card uses 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) GDDR6, while the NVIDIA card uses 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) GDDR7.

The memory bus widths differ: 224 bit for AMD versus 256 bit for NVIDIA. This combination of a wider bus and faster memory gives the NVIDIA card its 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card's narrower bus and slower memory result in 504.0 GB/s.

The bus interfaces differ as well. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The AMD card has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for direct display connection. The NVIDIA card has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. Its physical dimensions are 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

The AMD card was released on 2024-10-02. The NVIDIA card has a release date of 2025-12-31. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega. The NVIDIA card's launch MSRP is 749 USD.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA card has 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card has 504.0 GB/s.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA card has 70 ray tracing cores. The AMD card has 54.

Q: Which card has tensor cores?

A: Only the NVIDIA card has tensor cores, with 280 of them. The AMD card has none.

Q: Which card can connect to displays?

A: The NVIDIA card has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The AMD card has no display outputs.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD card sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA card sits at the 36th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison in the database is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 853. The delta is -86.4%, meaning the AMD card trails by 86.4%. This is not a close contest. The NVIDIA card delivers roughly 7.4 times the score of the AMD card in this specific test.

The nearest rivals data places each card in a different competitive context. The AMD card's closest rival is the NVIDIA P102-100, with an average score of 58528 and a delta of 0.2%. The AMD card's average benchmark score is 58657, which is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M. These deltas are small, indicating that the AMD card sits in a tightly clustered performance band.

The NVIDIA card's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, with an average score of 6270 and a delta of 0%. The NVIDIA card's average score is 6270, placing it exactly level with that rival. The Quadro K620 trails by 0.2%, the AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8%, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9%. These small deltas again indicate a tight performance cluster, but the cluster itself is very different from the AMD card's cluster.

The FP32 compute figures reinforce the benchmark gap. The NVIDIA card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS, while the AMD card delivers 27.65 TFLOPS. The texture rate also favors NVIDIA: 686.6 GTexel/s versus 432.0 GTexel/s. The pixel rates are 235.4 GPixel/s for NVIDIA and 192.0 GPixel/s for AMD. In every throughput metric, the NVIDIA card is ahead.

The power efficiency story is more nuanced. The AMD card delivers 27.65 TFLOPS at 158 W, which is 175 W per TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS at 350 W, which is 7.96 W per TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card is more efficient per unit of compute, but it consumes more than double the absolute power. The AMD card's lower power draw and single-slot design make it suitable for dense compute installations where power density is a constraint.

The memory capacity difference is the AMD card's primary advantage. At 28 GB, it offers 75% more memory than the 16 GB NVIDIA card. For workloads that require loading large datasets into GPU memory without spilling to system memory, the AMD card has a structural edge. The NVIDIA card's advantage in bandwidth (896.0 GB/s versus 504.0 GB/s) does not compensate for the capacity gap in memory-bound scenarios.

The release dates indicate different product lifecycles. The AMD card launched on 2024-10-02, while the NVIDIA card has a release date of 2025-12-31. The NVIDIA card is marked as Active in production status, while the AMD card's production status is not specified. The NVIDIA card also carries a launch MSRP of 749 USD, which is the only price information in the database.

The benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA card dominates in the only direct test and in every compute throughput metric. The AMD card offers more memory, lower power draw, and a smaller physical footprint. The choice between them depends entirely on whether the workload prioritizes raw performance or memory capacity with modest power requirements.