AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. Each product was tested individually under different conditions, so a direct score-for-score comparison is not possible. Instead, the available benchmark results must be read through their respective positions in the database.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 posts an average benchmark score of 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs tracked. Its strongest recorded result is a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460, alongside a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0, with a 50th percentile ranking. This absence of recorded performance data means the Intel part cannot be numerically compared to the AMD card on any specific test.

Looking at the AMD card's nearest rivals provides context for its standing. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, which is 0.2% behind the Radeon PRO V710. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT sits 0.5% lower at 58,392. The Intel Arc A570M trails by 0.7% with 58,239, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 1% behind at 58,085. These deltas show the Radeon PRO V710 holding a narrow but consistent lead over a cluster of very closely matched competitors. The margins are small, but the data indicates the V710 edges out each of these four cards in aggregate scoring.

For the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, the lack of benchmark data means there is no measured performance to weigh against the Radeon PRO V710 or any other product. The database records it as having zero average score, which reflects missing entries rather than a literal performance of zero. Its 50th percentile position is derived from hardware specifications and release status, not from observed test results.

Architecture Differences

The two products sit at opposite ends of the GPU design spectrum. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 28,100 million transistors packed into a 346 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip based on Xe3-LPG architecture, built on Intel's own 3 nm process. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no density figure can be calculated.

The compute resources differ dramatically. The Radeon PRO V710 carries 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and a single ray tracing core. These numbers reflect fundamentally different market positions: the AMD card is a full-size discrete accelerator, while the Intel chip is an integrated graphics solution with the slot width listed as IGP.

Memory configurations reinforce that gap. The Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 across a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system. Its memory speed is likewise system dependent.

Clock behavior also differs. The AMD card has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Intel part starts at 300 MHz base and boosts to 2300 MHz, a wider range typical of power-constrained integrated parts that scale up under light load. The Radeon PRO V710's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s. The Intel chip manages 9.200 GPixel/s and 18.40 GTexel/s respectively. Floating point throughput shows the scale of the difference: the AMD card delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 27.65 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel part produces 588.8 GFLOPS FP32 and 1,177.6 GFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical requirements diverge sharply. The Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and requires a suggested 450 W power supply. It is a single-slot card with PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and no display outputs. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile draws 25 W, needs no power connectors, and uses an IGP bus interface. Its display outputs are portable device dependent.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel chip is listed as Active in production status, with a release date of 2026-04-15. The AMD card was released on 2024-10-02 and has no production status listed. The AMD part's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel chip's predecessor is HD Graphics-M.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every measurable performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS is roughly 47 times higher than the Intel part's 588.8 GFLOPS. Pixel rate is about 21 times higher, texture rate about 23 times higher. The AMD card has 27 times more shading units, 27 times more TMUs, 24 times more ROPs, and 54 times more ray tracing cores. Memory bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s versus system dependent shared memory gives the AMD part a decisive advantage in any bandwidth-sensitive workload.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 25 W TDP is far lower than the 158 W requirement of the Radeon PRO V710. It also requires no external power connector and produces no additional cooling burden beyond what the host device already provides. The Intel chip's 3 nm process node is smaller than AMD's 5 nm node, although transistor counts are unknown, so density cannot be compared. Its boost clock of 2300 MHz exceeds the AMD card's 2000 MHz boost, though the base clocks are far apart.

For use cases, the data points to a clear split. The Radeon PRO V710, with no display outputs, is built for compute tasks in servers or workstations where rendering or processing happens headlessly. Its large 28 GB frame buffer and high bandwidth suit workloads that need to hold substantial datasets on the GPU. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, with portable device dependent outputs, is designed for laptops and small form factor systems where integrated graphics provide display output and basic acceleration. Its system shared memory means it scales with whatever RAM the host provides.

Benchmark presence matters here. The Radeon PRO V710 has two recorded benchmark scores and a strong 88th percentile ranking. The Intel part has none. Any workload that relies on measured GPU performance, such as 3D rendering, OpenCL compute, or DirectX 12 gaming, would favor the AMD card based on available data. The Intel chip's advantages are limited to integration benefits: lower power draw, no add-in card footprint, and no external power requirements.

The Verdict

The database shows two products that are not direct competitors. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a high-end discrete accelerator aimed at professional compute environments. Its 88th percentile ranking, 58,657 average benchmark score, and 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance place it firmly in the upper tier of all GPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals, the NVIDIA P102-100, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, Intel Arc A570M, and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, all sit within 1% of its average score, indicating a tightly contested performance class where the V710 holds a slight edge.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics solution for portable devices. Its 50th percentile ranking reflects a mid-tier position among all GPUs, but with no benchmark scores recorded, its actual performance is unverified. The 128 shading units, 588.8 GFLOPS FP32, and 25 W TDP indicate a part designed for basic graphics output and light acceleration, not heavy compute.

Anyone selecting between these two should rely on the measured data. If the workload requires discrete GPU compute with high memory bandwidth and substantial shading resources, the Radeon PRO V710 is the only option with recorded performance to support that choice. If the requirement is for a low-power integrated GPU inside a portable device, the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile fits that role, but its performance claims cannot be validated from the database. The data does not support using the Intel part for tasks that demand the throughput levels the AMD card provides. The choice is dictated by form factor and power envelope, not by performance parity.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 have any display outputs?

A: No, the database lists its display outputs as "No outputs." It is designed for compute workloads without direct display connectivity.

Q: What memory configuration does the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile use?

A: It uses System Shared memory, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as System Dependent.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO V710 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 6950 XT's 58,392.

Q: What is the FP32 performance of each product?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS FP32. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile delivers 588.8 GFLOPS FP32.

Q: Which product has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a boost clock of 2300 MHz, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 boosts to 2000 MHz.

Q: What power connectors does each product require?

A: The Radeon PRO V710 requires one 8-pin power connector and has a TDP of 158 W. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile requires no power connectors and has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmarks for the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for it, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.